A nation will still live in backwardness despite being a democracy, if it is overtly centralised and decision makers have zero skin in the game. Unless the institutions are antifragile, democracy is demo-crazy.
China is building a 60,000 MW dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo at Medog. India’s answer, the 11,200 MW Siang Upper Multipurpose Project, was first proposed in 1983 and declared a national project in 2008.
Last year or so, India finally made moves to get the project rolling.
On Friday night, a mob that called itself “Gen Z” set fire to the NHPC office and a police station in Pasighat, looted the homes of two MLAs and injured more than 40 police personnel. Arunachal holds about 40% of India’s hydropower potential. Its installed capacity is 2,115 MW.
Every project of national scale now has to get past veto points, most of it is just stalled out of motivated malice. From survey consent, social impact assessments, environmental clearances, litigation, local politics, and finally the violent street veto.
Really need to think if Democrazy as it is practised in India today has anything remotely useful to offer especially considering economic aspirations via @timesofindia
Institute for Civilisational OS retweeted
India’s economic progress is being held back by more than politics. The deeper problem lies in our collective subconscious-divided by caste, religion, ethnicity, language, and economic status.
We think in tribes, not as one nation.
Until we overcome this tribal mindset, India will struggle to realize its true potential.
How should a society be designed so as to prevent the ills of lobbies?
Skin in the game, radical poly-centred decentralisation, clear rules, optionality.
The lack of public transit robustness could have been avoided if it had incentives for private players. Chennai could have been an incredibly functional city.
Major reason for air pollution in India is farm fires. Singapore witnessed the same these days not because it has no sound internal policy but because of Indonesian activity.
Who is ready to break the bad union of farms in India and tarnish people of the same protectionist mindset!
As India braces for Delhi - Mumbai "pollution season" and accompanied protests (we can all predict this), do read my post below.
Attached is a photo of Singapore in media some days ago. It seems their pollution level had gone to hazardous levels.
Not because the well managed and clean city-state did any mistake, but because of Indonesia burning their forests.
The fires of Indonesia themselves seem a little suspicious. They didn't happen naturally but were lit widely by humans - specifically companies. Right at a time when the wind will turn towards Singapore.
So the Singapore govt is now taking some extreme steps like going after these culprit companies even if they are based outside Singapore. Good work by their govt.
But here's what Indians need to understand. Delhi or Mumbai pollution getting worse at this time of the year is not because of automobile, not because of road dust, not because of construction activity as they are all always blamed.
They do contribute their bit, but never as much as farm fires. Just like Singapore facing Indonesian farm and forest fires, Indian cities face farm fires lit by our Anna Datas in many provinces.
The govt and local authorities are afraid of them. They have already been encouraged to use machines and compactors but they wont. If authorities go to tell them to use it, they may get violent and force the authorities to burn the farms themselves.
Now what I feel is going on is some kind of deliberate burning at the right time, using wind direction, to cause pollution in Delhi and Mumbai. Just like Singapore is being hit with pollution from Indonesia by some companies.
So people can protest all they want against Delhi and Mumbai govt in the coming months. They can imagine if they do a "regime change" this pollution issue will go away. But this pollution isn't going away until farm burning stops.
⚡ Share of electricity from nuclear – Top 20 cultural/geographic clusters (2025)
🇫🇷 France (Western Romance)
68%
🇸🇰🇭🇺🇨🇿 Central Europe (Slovakia–Hungary–Czechia)
up to 64% (Slovakia)
🇺🇦🇧🇾 East Slavic (Ukraine–Belarus)
up to 55% (Ukraine)
🇫🇮🇸🇪 Nordic (Finland–Sweden)
up to 40% (Finland)
🇧🇬🇸🇮 Southeast / Balkan-adjacent (Bulgaria–Slovenia)
up to 41% (Bulgaria)
🇧🇪 Benelux-adjacent (Belgium)
~33–41%
🇰🇷 East Asia (South Korea)
~31%
🇦🇲 Caucasus (Armenia)
~30–31%
🇨🇭 Alpine (Switzerland)
~27%
🇦🇪 Gulf (United Arab Emirates)
~20–22%
🇷🇴 Eastern Europe (Romania)
~20%
🇪🇸 Iberian / Southern Europe (Spain)
~19%
🇺🇸🇨🇦 North America (United States–Canada)
up to 18% (US)
🇷🇺 Eurasian (Russia)
~18%
🇵🇰 South Asia (Pakistan)
~16%
🇬🇧 British Isles (United Kingdom)
~11–14%
🇯🇵 Japanese (Japan)
~9%
🇦🇷 Southern Cone (Argentina)
~7%
🇨🇳 East Asian mainland (China)
~5%
🇿🇦 Southern Africa (South Africa)
~5%
Source: Eurostat / Ember / IAEA PRIS / Energy Institute aggregates.
⚡ Share of electricity from renewable sources (2025)
✅ Highest in the EU
🇦🇹 Austria: 90.8%
🇸🇪 Sweden: 89.2%
🇩🇰 Denmark: 77.7%
❌ Lowest in the EU
🇱🇺 Luxembourg: 23.3%
🇨🇿 Czechia: 19.2%
🇲🇹 Malta: 11.2%
🇪🇺 EU: 49.9%
Covers electricity only, not all energy use. 2025 figures are provisional.
Source: Eurostat
Institute for Civilisational OS retweeted
“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”
— Jesus Christ, Mark 8:36 (KJV)
Nearly 2,000 years ago, Jesus asked a question that remains one of the most unsettling in human history.
Consider where the conversation took place.
Jesus and his disciples were in the region of Caesarea Philippi, a city named in honor of the Roman emperor. Rome commanded vast territories, controlled enormous wealth, and possessed military power on a scale few civilizations had achieved.
In that setting, Jesus challenged his followers to consider what a person truly gains by acquiring everything the world offers at the cost of his own soul.
History gives us reasons to take that question seriously.
Around 110 BC, the Numidian king Jugurtha discovered how easily powerful men in Rome could be bribed. According to the historian Sallust, he departed the city with a devastating observation:
“A city for sale and doomed to speedy destruction if it finds a purchaser!”
Rome continued to expand. Its wealth grew, its armies conquered, and its monuments became grander. Yet Sallust, writing in the first century BCE, argued that the destruction of Carthage in 146 BC had removed a common enemy and allowed greed, ambition, and corruption to flourish.
Rome was gaining power while its own historians questioned what that power was doing to its character.
Centuries later, Florence faced a different moral crisis.
On February 7, 1497, followers of the Dominican preacher Girolamo Savonarola gathered in the Piazza della Signoria for the famous Bonfire of the Vanities. Mirrors, luxury goods, books, and works of art were thrown into the flames.
Florence had become one of Europe’s great centers of banking, commerce, and artistic achievement. Its wealthy patrons had commissioned some of the Renaissance’s greatest masterpieces.
Yet Savonarola believed that the city’s pursuit of wealth and pleasure had corrupted its Christian foundations.
His methods were extreme, and his movement eventually collapsed. In May 1498, he was executed in the same square.
How does a society preserve its moral character while enjoying the prosperity its achievements have produced? And how far should it go in trying?
The words of Jesus also changed individual lives.
In sixteenth-century Paris, Ignatius of Loyola reportedly repeated Mark 8:36 to Francis Xavier, a young man with considerable academic and worldly ambitions.
Xavier eventually joined Ignatius and became one of the founding members of the Society of Jesus. He would spend much of his remaining life as a missionary in Asia.
For Xavier, the question became deeply personal. What was he willing to surrender for something he considered greater than worldly success?
Perhaps that explains why this verse has endured for nearly two millennia.
Christianity itself has inspired some of history’s greatest works of architecture, music, literature, and art.
Jesus understood the temptation to measure success by what we acquire. His question asks us to consider what we might sacrifice along the way.
If a man can gain the whole world and lose his soul, can a civilization do the same?
Institute for Civilisational OS retweeted
If same family couples happen to carry the exact same hidden, inactive "broken" gene, their child has a 25% (1-in-4) chance of inheriting that broken gene from both parents. Causing autosomal recessive genetic disorders.
40% to 50% of the children who actually end up sick enough to be treated for them at Indian specialized hospitals come from parents who are blood relatives.
There is also enhanced risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and development pauses.
In less than 10 years the Rupee, Pound, Dollar and Euro fell by around 30%. Moral of the story is to never store money.
Think about deploying in hard currencies and things people would value otherwise (forget money in its traditional sense)
If same family couples happen to carry the exact same hidden, inactive "broken" gene, their child has a 25% (1-in-4) chance of inheriting that broken gene from both parents. Causing autosomal recessive genetic disorders.
40% to 50% of the children who actually end up sick enough to be treated for them at Indian specialized hospitals come from parents who are blood relatives.
There is also enhanced risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and development pauses.
Political will for infra saw a good rise in all NDA governments. Just needs to build up and percolate.
Why do India's infrastructure projects get delayed?
The Centre has shared the numbers with states:
• 75% of delays happen before work even starts
• Land acquisition is the biggest reason, at 35% of all issues
• These delays have added ₹3 lakh crore to project costs
• Forest clearances take 500+ days, not the 150 they should
• Moving pipes and power lines takes 500–600 days
• A highway needs 22 approvals from 16 state agencies
The road transport ministry also ranked states on how well they acquire land for highways using an efficiency score
Best:
Haryana 75.8
Madhya Pradesh 66.2
Rajasthan 65.9
Worst:
Tamil Nadu 45.4
Maharashtra 43.6
Gujarat 30.5
Gujarat is last. Delhi–Mumbai Expressway kind of validates. Its first stretch opened in 2023 in Haryana and Rajasthan, the #1 and #3 states. MP build it fast . The stretches are still stuck in Gujarat with some Gujarat packages weren't even awarded until November 2023,
The road was due in January 2023. About 90 km in Gujarat is now expected only by December 2029.
The Centre wants one time-bound portal for land, faster parallel clearances, and one person in charge of approvals in every state. via @EconomicTimes
C. Rajagopalachari introduced The Single-Point System: Instead of multi-point taxes that required tax collectors to inspect businesses at every stage of production, Rajaji designed a flat, single-point turnover tax. This was in 1939, as Premier of Madras Presidency (aka Tamil Nadu now).
Defying his own bureaucrats and national planners, Rajaji used his executive office to completely abolish food rationing and statutory price controls in Madras overnight. Grain flowed naturally across district borders, prices stabilized, and artificial shortages vanished. His state-level success was so undeniable that it forced the central government in New Delhi to rethink and ease food controls nationwide.
Have you asked your AI to analyse your music playlist? What does it tell about your taste, not just for music but of your inner self?
Institute for Civilisational OS retweeted
Green extremists often speak as though abundance is the disease, when in fact abundance is usually what makes environmental improvement possible.
A poor society burns what it can find and dumps what it cannot manage. A rich society can afford scrubbers, pipelines, wastewater treatment, research labs, and better rules.
humanprogress.org/earth-days…


























