Nagi 🦝

🚨UPDATE:HeeHaw wasn’t just a farm animalhe was family. Raised indoors as a baby, he even slept in Hannah Israel’s bed, and she proudly called him her son. Sweet-natured and friendly to everyone he met, HeeHaw brought joy to local nursing homes and petting zoos. ​Tragedy struck around 12:45 a.m. on August 30, 2026, when police officers entered the pasture at Elsberry Riding and Farm without notifying the landowner. True to his friendly nature, HeeHaw trotted over braying to greet them, acting just like the household pet he was. Instead of a warm welcome, a handler deployed a Taser against him, and Officer Garner fired a single shot from his department-issued Glock 17. Mortally wounded, HeeHaw turned, walked up the hill, and passed away in his home pasture. The officers left. The family searched with flashlights to find his body. There was no reasonable threat. None. HeeHaw was a miniature donkey. He was bottle-fed from birth. He was trained to walk up to people. He brayed at strangers because that is how a donkey talks. He did not have a weapon. He did not bite anyone. He did not trample anyone. After the shot he turned away and went up the hill. That is the opposite of an attack. A reasonable person would not have believed that donkey was about to cause harm. A reasonable person seeing a petting-zoo animal come toward him in its own pasture at night would have seen a curious pet, not a deadly threat. Chief Jamie Newsome watched the bodycam. Asked if Garner said he feared for his life, Newsome said no. The video has not been released. The officers departed immediately, leaving the grieving family to search the dark pasture with flashlights until they found his body. ​HeeHaw posed no reasonable threat whatsoever. As a miniature donkey bottle-fed from birth, he was specifically trained to approach people, braying simply to communicate. He was unarmed, showed no aggression, and neither bit nor trampled anyone. In fact, after being shot, he turned and walked up the hill a clear act of retreat, not an attack. ​No reasonable person would have perceived a gentle petting-zoo animal approaching in its own familiar pasture as a danger. Even Chief Jamie Newsome, after reviewing the bodycam footage, confirmed that Officer Garner never claimed he feared for his life. Despite this, the police department has yet to release the video to the public. That record is enough to say Trenton Garner is not fit to be a police officer. A man who treats a greeting from a baby donkey as a reason to fire a Glock 17 should be barred from wearing a badge again. Now look at the law that would have applied if he were not a cop. Georgia Code § 16-12-4 is the animal cruelty statute. A donkey counts. Under § 16-12-4(b), a person commits cruelty to animals when he causes death to an animal by any unjustifiable act. Under § 16-12-4(d)(1), a person commits aggravated cruelty to animals when he maliciously causes the death of an animal. That is a felony. First offense: 1 to 5 years in prison, a fine up to $15,000, or both. The only off-ramp is justification. § 16-12-4(h) says you may kill an animal only when you reasonably believe it is necessary to stop an imminent threat of injury to a person, another animal, or property. That defense requires a reasonable belief. Not panic. Not “it came toward me.” A reasonable person, looking at a house-raised miniature donkey running up and braying on its owner’s land, would not have believed lethal force was necessary. There was no imminent threat. There was no harm. There was a pet. But for the fact that Trenton Garner is a police officer, he would be facing felony charges under § 16-12-4. Prosecutors would not need a new statute. They would have misdemeanor cruelty on the unjustifiable killing. They would have felony aggravated cruelty on a malicious killing with no lawful reason. On these facts, that felony charge is the charge a civilian would be looking at. A felony conviction of that kind is also the kind of record that bars a person from possessing firearms. So the issue that has to be asked in public is this: if the same conduct would have put a civilian in range of a § 16-12-4 felony and taken his guns, why is there no serious process to decide whether this officer should keep a firearm after he used one on a bottle-fed baby donkey that posed no reasonable threat? The badge is what is keeping this in an administrative file. The cruelty statute does not say “except police.” It says the killing has to be justified. On this record, the justification is a claim that a bottle-fed mini donkey charged a grown man. A reasonable person would not have believed that. That is the entire defense, and it does not hold. Demand the bodycam. Demand he never wear a badge again. And put the firearms question on the table, because Georgia already wrote the answer for everyone who is not wearing a uniform. Cedartown PD Case 26-7475. O.C.G.A. § 16-12-4. Georgia Department of Agriculture Law Enforcement Division is investigating. 📸 Credit / Source Jim Feury