Pinned Tweet
"Forgiveness" (ridding oneself of hatred) is not, and was never meant to be understood as, "clemency" (letting evil run rampant).
Go read your Bible again.
"Meek," praus in Greek, is better translated as "disciplined restraint."
Repentance is the condition of Salvation.
Nate retweeted
In 2018 the economy was doing extremely well. Gas was cheap, inflation was low, wages were up and unemployment was near an all-time low.
Black unemployment hit the lowest level ever recorded.
For the first time in eleven years, the poverty rate was significantly lower than before the Great Recession.
And yet...
Democrats got 25 million more votes during the 2018 midterms than during the 2014 midterms.
25 million more Democrat votes, even though Republicans had the highest midterm turnout in history.
The results were a blue wave, with Democrats turning the same number of House seats as they just did in 2026. Democrats even flipped more Governorships in 2018 than in 2026. Republicans were able to win back some red state Senate seats in 2018, but those midterms were considered a blue wave.
Perhaps there is more at play than the price of gas.
For that matter I'm friends with a good number of accomplished female authors too, and they see the problem just as clearly.
They also have significant male audiences. 🤔
Listen to yourself. Women "have" to follow male protagonists, when an article in the Atlantic - hardly a right-wing polemic - just established that female protagonists are *at least* twice as common in MG/YA fiction? And then you cite Percy Jackson and Harry Potter, two series that debuted literal decades ago? I can read a good novel in a single day; if you can't name a single well-known male-centered series from *this decade* then do you really think there's an ample supply of fiction for men of any age? And then you turn to *Japanese* media to make your argument, because they still recruit male talent and publish for male audiences while Western publishing has completely exiled them if they're not "of color" or LGBTQ or preferably both and making those topics a significant chunk of the content.
Take it from a male author who's friends with a great many male authors - it's actually a problem, and it's not just in your imagination.
Listen to yourself. Women "have" to follow male protagonists, when an article in the Atlantic - hardly a right-wing polemic - just established that female protagonists are *at least* twice as common in MG/YA fiction? And then you cite Percy Jackson and Harry Potter, two series that debuted literal decades ago? I can read a good novel in a single day; if you can't name a single well-known male-centered series from *this decade* then do you really think there's an ample supply of fiction for men of any age? And then you turn to *Japanese* media to make your argument, because they still recruit male talent and publish for male audiences while Western publishing has completely exiled them if they're not "of color" or LGBTQ or preferably both and making those topics a significant chunk of the content.
Take it from a male author who's friends with a great many male authors - it's actually a problem, and it's not just in your imagination.
I always thought this was a fallacy: women have to follow male protagonists, so why is it so difficult for a man to follow a female protagonist? No, I’m not asking you to read a romance novel or follow in the steps of Bella from Twilight or Feyre from ACOTAR—but surely there were men who could see themselves in hardened heroines like Katniss from The Hunger Games and Tris from Divergent. And young male readers always have Harry Potter and Percy Jackson too. There ARE books out there: you just have to be willing to look (or branch out to comics/graphic novels/manga too—I know many boys grew up with Goku, Luffy, Naruto, and Ichigo to name a few from manga!).
What's most striking about the authors' wife's comment is something nobody has said in as many words yet: it's blatant, naked misandry. The most raw example of pure bigoted hatred you'll ever see. "Boys finding self-actualization through a tool" is as essential to our DNA as women playing with dolls, but only a male's innate nature is seen as innately wrong. Women are so immensely privileged in our society, and misandry so normalized, that they think absolutely nothing of sneering at little boys for being *normal.*
We're going to have to build our own institutions, and we're going to have to start ideologically policing them to the same extreme degree that leftists do, to prevent them from infiltrating them and excluding us from the things we built ourselves. There is no other way.
Nate retweeted
So this guy cherry picks a couple of family rules pretends thats the whole of sharia and the nothing to worry about crowd eats it up?
Unbelievable.
This is how u eventually get christians on the chopping block and act shocked when it happens.
Sharia doesnt give christians or anyone else equal citizenship. It hands them dhimmi status to pay the jizya and be subdued.
Freedom of speech and religion gets restricted as ur not allowed to share the gospel especially with muslims and leaving islam for Christ gets u executed under the traditional schools.
Every place that has applied sharia for any length of time has watched the persecution of other faiths take root especially christianity.
Funny how that keeps happening but we promise it will be different in the United States. Lets just allowing the usurping of the constitution.
Seriously…..wake the hell up people.
This clown highlighting inheritance and user fee instead of interest talking points while ignoring the rest is a special kind of ignorance.
Nothing says theres nothing to worry about like a system that legally subordinates non muslims and punishes conversion to Christ.
Countries that have protected freedom of speech and religion havent executed christians and other faiths….sharia has!
Reading the historical record and taking sharia at its word for the past 1400 years isnt ignorance.
Ignoring it is.
Nate retweeted
Only 4% of people listed foreign policy as their top priority. (The GOP won most of them)
33% (almost all democrats) thought the top issue was “the state of democracy”
The left voted against Trump for dismantling their institutional control.
Not because they are anti-war.
Replying to @CynicalPublius
I actually disagree.
The numbers show that...bizarrely...GOP won the VERY SMALL number of people most concerned about "foreign policy" by 3.
The indirect economic effects weren't great, but the GOP ONLY lost "the economy" by 6.
Nate retweeted
The critical thing here is... Trump has been scorched earth Trump for 2 years now. And libs knew it.
But the problem Rs ran into is...
Only Libs knew it.
Replying to @SuitablePolitic
We've been waiting many years to see Scorched Earth Trump.
I hope he has the will to reach his final form.
Amazing how they continue telling on themselves. They're REALLY angry because Tomoe doesn't hate her country and isn't a vile jew-hating jackbooted goose-stepping bigot like they are.
Fuck these scumbags. Earning their ire is a badge of honor.





































