Author of https://teapawt.org/t.co/pjyK6Tt4x3 GitHub: https://teapawt.org/t.co/GfDjTRhD9V Buy me a coffee: https://teapawt.org/t.co/QiGAAJyTty
Joined January 2012
- Tweets1.9K
- Following795
- Followers505
- Likes6.1K
Pinned Tweet
Epstein records, through 4 Oct 2026. Three inventories. Each stands alone. A file mention is not an allegation. A visit is not participation. A resignation is not a finding. No death in these records has been ruled a murder.
Chronicle: teapawt.org/The_Witten/status/2106…
Resignations, removals, deaths, investigations: teapawt.org/The_Witten/status/2106…
People, records, places: teapawt.org/The_Witten/status/2106…
Science and subject reports, separate branch: teapawt.org/The_Witten/status/2025…
Conflicts are left open.
Witten retweeted
When we return next week, we’ll get 218 signatures for Epstein Files Transparency Act II, which guarantees a vote.
Survivors will be able to get their own records, State Attorneys General can prosecute crimes, and we can take the DOJ to court for keeping critical files hidden.⚖️
Witten retweeted
Tonight was a total referendum on Trump.
He told people to vote like he was on the ballot and they did.
Trump covered up the Epstein files protecting rapists and pedophiles, started a foreign war no one wanted and killed a school full of kids, put his rich elite donors before the struggling Americans who put him in office, made life unaffordable with his tariffs, and caused gas and diesel prices to skyrocket while he played the market and sold crypto.
And Republicans stood behind him silently clapping like trained baby seals.
And Trump ran me and Thomas Massie out of the Congress and our Republican colleagues stayed silent.
But really it’s what Trump did to the American people.
And tonight they sent him a clear message.
But it’s the rest of Republicans that need to learn the lesson and drastically change course.
And I’m not sure if they’re capable of that.
This dude... was so great... RIP
teapawt.org/SirPatStew/status/2115…
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to:
Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund
alzresearch.org/giving/
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources
alzfdn.org/donate/
Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
Witten retweeted
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to:
Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund
alzresearch.org/giving/
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources
alzfdn.org/donate/
Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
Witten retweeted
They are STILL withholding pages from the Epstein files, and the document numbering proves it.
EFTA01510708 and EFTA01510709 are consecutive releases, but the original JPMorgan and SDNY Bates numbers skip a page. The bank statement jumps from page 6 of 8 to page 8 of 8. The consolidated statement jumps from page 10 to page 12.
Where is page 7? Where is consolidated page 11?
And then there are the roughly 4,500 check images reportedly reviewed from Epstein's accounts, with 66 identified as missing. These are financial records that could help establish who received payments and where money went.
If these pages were lawfully withheld, identify the legal basis. If they weren't, release them.
The American people shouldn't have to play detective to determine WTH is going on.
Witten retweeted
Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! teapawt.org/i/spaces/1lKQRWOBjlzGE
The Tale of Two Swedish Ladies
Two young Swedish women leave home in the late 1970s and settle in the United States. One goes to New York. The other goes to Palm Beach. On paper they look almost interchangeable. Both later carry the name Anderson in opposite directions. One starts as “Andersson” and becomes Dubin. The other arrives without the name Anderson and later takes the name “Anderson.”
Their public records never show them meeting. Yet both end up in the area of Jeffrey Epstein’s world through completely separate paths.
Eva Andersson arrives in New York and signs with Ford Models. She models while putting herself through medical school, dates Epstein through most of the 1980s, earns her M.D. She breaks up with Epstein around 1989-90 (while he dates / gets involved with Ghislaine in 1991). And in 1994, she married hedge-fund manager Glenn Dubin. Epstein remains close to the family afterward. Their daughter Celina was named in earlier Epstein trusts (including Zorro Ranch, Little St. James, and the residual); the family has said they were unaware of this and later renounced any potential inheritance.
Inger Kenth arrives in Palm Beach and marries banker Harry Loy Anderson Jr. They raise six children, including Bettina (born 1986). Harry’s bank holds Epstein’s accounts starting around 1991. In 1998 he writes a letter calling Epstein a valued client of high integrity. Their children later start the Paradise Fund. Story Cowles, who dated Epstein’s longtime assistant Sarah Kellen and visited Epstein nearly every day during his 2008–2009 jail sentence, moves in the same Palm Beach circles. Bettina eventually marries Donald Trump Jr. Harry Loy Anderson Jr. died in 2013. Inger Anderson continues her work in Palm Beach family business and philanthropy.
One woman dated Epstein. The other was married to his Palm Beach banker. They lived in the same small town for years. The documented records show overlapping Epstein ties through different people and different decades. They show no evidence the two women ever met.
ALT Eva Andersson-Dubin, Glenn Dubin, and their daughter Celina Dubin
ALT Harry Loy Anderson Jr. and Inger Anderson
ALT Bettina Anderson and Donald Trump Jr.
ALT Sarah Kellen
Witten retweeted
@Subscriptions @XCreators @Support
My Creator Subscriptions application was rejected about a year ago. Creator Studio still shows “Rejected” with no option to reapply and no appeal path.
I meet the current requirements (Premium, 2k+ Premium followers, 5M+ organic impressions in the last 3 months, active posting, complete profile, 2FA, etc.).
Can you manually review or reset the status so I can reapply? Please and Thank you!
Witten retweeted
One thing that stands out about Paolo Zampolli’s dismissal as Trump’s Special Envoy is the Newsweek article that ran right before it.
In April, Newsweek gave Zampolli an exclusive to answer his ex-partner Amanda Ungaro’s accusations. He denied everything, spoke of his son and reputation, and called her account a false narrative. The exclusive omitted a second woman, Victoria Drake, who went to the NYPD in 2023 and said he drugged and raped her in his New York townhouse. That allegation was public while Newsweek ran his side of the story. It was one of many stories about Zampolli that no U.S. outlets covered, though global outlets like RAI Report in Italy reported on it.
When Newsweek finally ran the Victoria Drake story in early October, with the rape allegation in a headline next to his government title, nothing about her account had changed since spring. It was as old and unproven as when they chose to protect him from it. The only likely change was that someone gave Newsweek the go-ahead to run it.
Who signaled it was safe? Who decided Paolo Zampolli was finally expendable and passed that word to Newsweek? Why was it safe to run on October 5th but not on April 25th?
Witten retweeted
A fitting time to reshare this clip of Paolo Zampolli…
Paolo Zampolli told Italian national television that he knew Epstein had very “young girls, minors, masseuses.”
Asked on RAI Report if he knew about Epstein’s “giri,” the Italian word for rings or rackets, not girlfriends, here is what he said:
“I knew he had the girls. I knew. But they weren’t mine, because they weren’t even models. They were young girls, minors, masseuses. The models were a cover-up for this Epstein.”
“Erano ragazzine, minorenni, massaggiatrici.” There are four admissions in one statement. He knew Epstein had girls. Not suspected. Not heard rumors. “Sapevo.” I knew.
He knew they were minors. He did not use “donne” or “ragazze.” He chose “ragazzine,” the Italian diminutive for very young girls, then clarified with “minorenni,” the legal term for under 18. He knew what they were there for.
“Massaggiatrici.” Masseuses. That is the exact euphemism in Palm Beach police reports, in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, in the Maxwell trial. Anyone near Epstein’s operation knew what “massage” meant. By using the word, Zampolli confirms he did too.
He described the structure. “Le modelle erano un cover-up.” The models were a cover-up. You do not describe something as a cover-up unless you understand what was being covered.
“They weren’t mine” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. He wants the listener to hear: I ran a real agency, Epstein ran a trafficking operation, those are two separate things. But he just said the models were a cover-up for the minors. A cover-up requires something on top and something underneath. He is telling you he understood both layers.
One of his models, Adriana Mucinska, was named in Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement as one of the four women granted immunity as potential co-conspirators in the trafficking of minors.
Zampolli’s models were not a cover-up in the abstract. One of them was sitting inside the operation. He knew about the girls who were minors.
Witten retweeted
Make sure to give it your social security number, blood type, astrological sign, mother's maiden name, favorite pizza topping, and exact time and location of your birth as well 😂
To buy stuff, you can just take a picture of your credit card, drop it in the chat and Grok @Bot will scour the Internet for the best deal on the item you want and order it
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
xAI explicitly warns users not to include personal information in prompts, yet credit card photos may contain such information.
Grok Bot's terms state that user data and credentials may be stored in its cloud environment and require human review for financial transactions.
x.ai/legal/privacy-…
x.ai/legal/grok-bot…
Witten retweeted
If I correctly understand our system of government, when a president or leader in the Congress gets into office, someone in the CIA pulls them aside for "the talk" and completely changes their priorities.
The public is then told the leaders now have secret knowledge the public can never know.
But the leader has no way of knowing the "secret" information is true and in context.
That puts the secret-keepers in firm control of the government's big decisions. If the secret-keepers agree with a government policy, they stay out of it. If they disagree with a policy, they say the UFOs will attack -- or some other unverifiable thing -- and by the way, we have recordings of every phone call you ever made, and scare the leaders into compliance.
Right in front of us. None of this is secret.
To use zoomer vernacular "We Space here... Space time... It's over, gg..."
teapawt.org/KnoxieLuv/status/21086…
Witten retweeted
Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! teapawt.org/i/spaces/1jxXgBqbRNOJZ