Living Life Outside Pandora’s ‘Deep State’ Box, Defending Our Inalienable Rights. Nurturing Seeds of a New Future. 🌱 Divergent. Abhor Autocratic Power Mongers.

On a little blue dot aka Earth
Joined April 2012
Be the path you want to see and see that future come to be. Yet, march of fascism on an alarming rise — tightly wrapped in suffocating flags of demise — with unfurled sword & battering shield — full of repressive authority & rank autocracy.
34
44
4
151
Thomas Drake retweeted
Same thing has always been true. You can't buy a tool that solves cybersecurity problems for you. Instead, you solve the cybersecurity problem yourself -- tools are just things you buy to make your job easier. Now replace "tool" with "AI". The chronic problem in cybersecurity has always been that organizations have abdicated responsibility for defense, relying upon vendors (and their tools) to solve cybersecurity for them. Now people want to outsource responsibility to the AI and it's going to work just as well -- which is to say, not at all. But the way, it's the same problem we have everywhere with AI doing work for people. Using AI is great -- but humans cannot abdicate responsibility to machines. In other words, if a lawyer uses AI to draft a pleading, they are responsible if the AI makes a mistake. We hear numerous stories of AIs hallucinating false references. It's not the AI's fault, it's the lawyer's fault who used AI. Now, lawyers should be using AI to draft such things, AIs will generally do a better job. But it's still the lawyer who is responsible for everything that document says, who needs to fact check every claim put there by the AI. The same with AI. You, the human, are responsible for understanding cybersecurity. Once you understand it, you can use AI to make it cheaper and easier to do it. But you cannot outsource responsibility to the AI. But, since it's been the industry norm to outsource responsibility to vendor products for over 30 years, people are going to attempt to apply the same strategy to AI. It'll become the next big things that vendors claim is the "silver bullet" or "magic pill" that'll solve your problems, and you (or your manager) is going to buy it, and it still won't be the thing that was promised.
There's a *ton* of cybersecurity advice going around right now. Organizations should choose which advice they follow wisely because the next 1-2 years will demonstrate what advice was good vs. not. My rubric for what I think is a good strategy vs. bad strategy boils down to whether I think the strategy is still solid *without any use of AI*. If so, then use AI to amplify the strategy. If the strategy being successful wholly depends upon using AI (and lots of it), then all defenders must outspend the most token-richest attackers. That tells me there's a critical bottleneck outside of your organization's control in it being successful. That's a huge risk to take.
4
5
19
2,044
Thomas Drake retweeted
Top Secret US memo sent from Brazil on 27 March 1964 outlining programme to undermine democratically-elected social democratic president João Goulart: "We are meanwhile undertaking complementary measures with our available resources to strengthen resistance forces. These include covert support for pro-democracy street rallies....and encouragement [of] democracy and anti-communist sentiment in Congress, armed forces, friendly labor and student groups, church, and business. We may be requesting modest supplementary funds for other covert action programs in near future." The typical CIA playbook. In this case, the operation was successful. President Goulart was overthrown in a military coup which began 4 days later. A brutal US-backed military dictatorship was installed and ruled for the next 21 years. Trump's CIA just failed against Lula though. Hope for the world. The US empire is eminently beatable in Latin America - and everywhere. Washington puppets Milei, Paz, Noboa et al are next.
6
139
3
238
3,599
Thomas Drake retweeted
In January 2016, the US Air Force decommissioned a single GPS satellite (SVN 23) and accidentally uploaded a 13.7-microsecond timing error into the broadcast navigation data. That 0.000013-second offset knocked BBC digital radio transmitters off the air for two days and broke police and fire dispatch networks across North America. Today, an attacker with a software-defined radio can force that exact timing failure on a target building from across the street. 1. Why critical infrastructure relies on a 1970s radio signal Cell towers, power substations, and stock exchanges all need their servers to tick in lockstep. Installing a commercial cesium atomic clock at every site costs roughly $65,000 per unit, so operators bolt a $200 GPS timing receiver to the roof instead. That rooftop antenna listens to atomic clocks aboard 31 GPS satellites orbiting 20,200 kilometers above the Earth. Civilian GPS L1 C/A was designed in the 1970s with no cryptographic authentication. Worse, by the time a satellite's radio signal travels 20,200 kilometers through space, it hits the Earth's surface at roughly -130 dBm (a tenth of a femtowatt). A 10-milliwatt transmitter plugged into a laptop in a parking lot is tens of millions of times stronger at the rooftop antenna than the real satellites in orbit. 2. Jam-and-spoof vs. synchronous time-walking If an attacker uses an open-source tool like gps-sdr-sim on a $300 SDR to broadcast a fake timestamp that is an hour off, a modern timing receiver spots the sudden jump and switches to its internal backup oscillator. To bypass that check, attackers use clock slewing, also known as time walking: * Hard takeover (gps-sdr-sim): A basic attacker generates a pre-computed baseband file that starts at the current UTC second, transmits strongly enough to force the rooftop receiver to lose lock on the real sky and re-acquire the louder fake signal, and then plays back a programmed clock drift. * Seamless carry-off (Synchronous spoofer): Against hardened receivers that alert on any signal drop, a more advanced spoofer uses a receiving antenna to track the live satellites in real time. It transmits a counterfeit signal matched to the exact code phase and Doppler shift of the real sky at the victim's antenna, ramps up its power by a few decibels to capture the receiver's Delay-Locked Loop (DLL), and pulls the timing pulse forward by 100 to 200 nanoseconds per second. Because the drift stays inside the receiver's tracking threshold, the local clock slides smoothly away from UTC without raising a loss-of-lock alarm. 3. What breaks when a clock drifts by microseconds Once a site's local clock drifts past a few microseconds, automated protection hardware starts shutting equipment down: * 5G TDD cell tower mute (±1.5 microseconds): Most mid-band 5G networks use Time Division Duplexing (TDD), where towers transmit and receive on the exact same frequency by alternating time slots every few milliseconds. The 3GPP specification requires neighboring towers to stay synchronized within ±1.5 microseconds (a 3-microsecond maximum window between adjacent base stations). If a spoofed tower drifts past 1.5 microseconds, its 100-watt downlink burst transmits directly into the neighboring tower's uplink listening window, deafening the cell. To prevent cross-link interference, the baseband's synchronization watchdog automatically mutes the radio transmitter and drops every phone on the tower. * 500 kV substation breaker trips (100 microseconds): High-voltage transmission lines use Line Current Differential Relays (ANSI 87L) at both ends of a wire to compare AC phase angles using GPS timestamps, while Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) track grid stability across cities. Under IEEE C37.118, just 26.5 microseconds of timing error creates a 1% Total Vector Error on a 60 Hz line (31.8 microseconds on a 50 Hz grid). If an attacker walks one substation's GPS clock off by 100 to 200 microseconds, the differential relay sees a massive phantom phase shift between the two ends of the transmission line, assumes the cable has suffered a short circuit, and trips the main 500 kV breakers on a healthy power line. * High-frequency trading halts (100 microseconds): Under European MiFID II RTS 25 rules, automated trading engines must timestamp every order within 100 microseconds of UTC. When the exchange's time-sync daemon detects that its GPS discipline has breached that 100-microsecond ceiling, compliance middleware halts order execution. 4. How infrastructure operators defend the clock Upgrading an orbiting satellite constellation takes decades, so engineers harden the ground equipment across four layers: * Galileo OSNMA and Chimera: Europe's Galileo constellation now broadcasts OSNMA (Open Service Navigation Message Authentication), which cryptographically signs the navigation data bits so a tool like gps-sdr-sim cannot forge satellite messages. Because an attacker can still record and delay genuine signed signals (a meaconing relay attack), newer systems pair data signatures with encrypted spreading-code markers like Galileo CAS and GPS Chimera. * Multi-constellation and multi-band receivers: Timing receivers track GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, and GLONASS across both L1 and L5 bands simultaneously. Spoofing four constellations across multiple frequencies at once requires vastly more complex RF hardware. * Anti-spoofing CRPA antennas: Critical sites use Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas (multi-element phased arrays) or choke-ring antennas that only accept signals arriving from high up in the sky and null out radio signals coming horizontally from a parking lot. * PTP over fiber and rubidium holdover: Telecom and grid operators back up rooftop antennas with Precision Time Protocol (IEEE 1588v2) distributed over fiber-optic lines, paired with local Oven-Controlled Crystal Oscillators (OCXOs) or miniature rubidium atomic clocks. If the rooftop antenna drifts faster than the internal rubidium physics package allows, the timing card disconnects the GPS input and free-runs within 1 microsecond for up to 72 hours.
15
81
12
529
38,743
Thomas Drake retweeted
BRENNAN: The DOJ lawsuit demands the Alaska result not be certified if voters are confused. The confusion is defined as Sen. Sullivan not winning. BLANCHE: That's not what it says BRENNAN: I'm quoting from it. You are telling them not to certify it. What right does the federal government have telling a state not to certify?
605
4,914
253
20,492
1,100,088
🚀 WHEN REALITY COLLIDES WITH INSTITUTIONAL SELF-PROTECTION After the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded in January 1986, killing all seven crew members, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman was appointed to the presidential Rogers Commission. He could have lent his prestige to the process and stayed within the established channels. He didn’t. 🔎 Feynman went around management and talked directly to the engineers and technicians who knew the hardware. What he found was devastating. Engineers had warned that the solid rocket booster O-rings became dangerously stiff in freezing temperatures. The warnings were known. The risk was real. Yet schedule pressure and institutional confidence repeatedly prevailed. Even more disturbing was the gap between how management perceived risk and how the engineers closest to the system understood it. Then Feynman did something brilliant. 🧊 During a televised hearing, he placed a piece of O-ring material in ice water and demonstrated that at low temperature it failed to recover properly. In seconds, physical reality cut through layers of institutional language. But Feynman wasn’t finished. When his conclusions risked being softened or marginalized in the final report, he reportedly made clear that he would not allow his name to legitimize a document that excluded his findings. His assessment became Appendix F. And he ended it with words every leader, investigator, inspector, engineer—and whistleblower—should remember: ⚠️ “For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.” That lesson reaches far beyond NASA. When organizations begin treating uncomfortable facts as problems to manage, rather than warnings to confront, institutional self-protection can become more important than truth. 🚨 Reputation cannot override evidence. 🚨 Hierarchy cannot change reality. 🚨 Consensus does not make something true. 🚨 And suppressing the messenger does not eliminate the underlying problem. Sometimes accountability requires one person willing to go around the bureaucracy, listen to the people closest to the problem, put the evidence on the table—and refuse to let it be buried. Truth does not become less true because an institution finds it inconvenient.
5
3
317
Thomas Drake retweeted
Everyone in tech is panicking about security right now. But outside of it, almost nobody knows anything is wrong. I wrote this so you don’t have to be the one explaining it to your family. Just send them this.
147
1,386
93
6,611
1,556,402
Elon says he is a “utopian anarchist” as defined by Iain M. Banks—who wrote a series about a futuristic spacefaring society called “the Culture.” Elon’s favorite volume Surface Detail stars an inconceivably rich sadistic oligarch named Joiler Veppers. Veppers secretly controls 70% of his civilization’s computing infrastructure. But his data centers are unique. Veppers stores AIs which torture the digital consciousness of people who have been condemned to be punished for all time. The torture chambers are called Hells, and Veppers rents them out to governments to make himself rich. The way people are uploaded to Hells is a technology called “neural lace” which is a chip that interfaces with your brain. In a different book, neural lace is called “the most efficient torture device ever created.” Another thing Veppers does with his data centers is use his AIs to covertly interfere with other civilizations’ interstellar wars when he wants. Kind of like crippling Starlink in Ukraine. Elon Musk is living in a demented science fiction alternate reality. Except it’s real enough to kill a lot more actual people.
Replying to @jimstewartson
receipts. he is obsessed with “the Culture”. look it up. they all have neuralink.
96
843
62
2,307
51,596
Thomas Drake retweeted
Ever notice how the evidence for so many conspiracy theories always seems to come down to the same four words? Ever notice how the evidence for so many conspiracy theories always seems to come down to the same four words? “LOOK AT THE VIDEO!” Bigfoot: No body, no bones, no verified DNA. “But look at the video!” Moon landing hoax: No credible physical evidence that the landings were faked. “But look at the video!” UFOs / Aliens: No independently verified extraterrestrial spacecraft. “But look at the video!” Flat Earth: Not a single reproducible experiment demonstrating a flat Earth. “But look at the video!” Chemtrails: No verifiable evidence of a secret global spraying operation. “But look at the video!” JFK second shooter: No conclusive physical evidence establishing a second gunman. “But look at the video!” 9/11 controlled demolition: No conclusive evidence of planted explosives. “But look at the video!” MH370 teleportation orbs: No physical evidence of aircraft being teleported through portals. “But look at the video!” Loch Ness Monster: No body, no bones, no verified specimen. “But look at the video! I mean, photo.” See the pattern? These extraordinary claims never seem to produce the independently verifiable, conclusive physical evidence needed to establish that they’re true. But somehow, there’s ALWAYS another blurry video. Another suspicious shadow. Another compression artifact. Another freeze-frame with a red circle around something. And thousands of people will spend YEARS arguing over a handful of pixels. Funny how the extraordinary evidence never seems to arrive, but the next video always does. And boy, do the grifters know it. Because as long as people keep watching, arguing, subscribing, buying books, and paying for documentaries, there’s money to be made from keeping the mystery alive. Who needs proof when you’ve got views? “LOOK AT THE VIDEO!” Bigfoot: No body, no bones, no verified DNA. “But look at the video!” Flat Earth: Not a single reproducible experiment demonstrating a flat Earth. “But look at the video!” Moon landing hoax: No credible physical evidence that the landings were faked. “But look at the video!” UFOs / Aliens: No independently verified extraterrestrial spacecraft. “But look at the video!” Chemtrails: No verifiable evidence of a secret global spraying operation. “But look at the video!” JFK second shooter: No conclusive physical evidence establishing a second gunman. “But look at the video!” 9/11 controlled demolition: No conclusive evidence of planted explosives. “But look at the video!” MH370 teleportation orbs: No physical evidence of aircraft being teleported through portals. “But look at the video!” Loch Ness Monster: No body, no bones, no verified specimen. “But look at the video! I mean, photo.” See the pattern? These extraordinary claims never seem to produce the independently verifiable, conclusive physical evidence needed to establish that they’re true. But somehow, there’s ALWAYS another blurry video. Another suspicious shadow. Another compression artifact. Another freeze-frame with a red circle around something. And thousands of people will spend YEARS arguing over a handful of pixels. Funny how the extraordinary evidence never seems to arrive, but the next video always does. And boy, do the grifters know it. Because as long as people keep watching, arguing, subscribing, buying books, and paying for documentaries, there’s money to be made from keeping the mystery alive. Who needs proof when you’ve got views and blind followers.
12
5
41
4,287
Thomas Drake retweeted
Sagan understood something timeless: people don't just believe false things - they attach themselves to them. Once that happens, evidence feels hostile, not helpful. And none of us are immune - the real test is whether you can admit it when you've been taken.
8
6
1
35
1,049
Thomas Drake retweeted
Terence Tao just published a 27 slide deck saying the AI math hype only shows you the wins.. every week you see a new post.. AI solved an open math problem.. Tao says that feed hides most of the story.. the failed attempts never get posted.. the compute bill never gets posted.. and most frontier problems are STILL unsolved.. then he went further.. blindly chasing more solved problems is now hurting math.. open problems were never the goal.. they were lighthouses.. the real value was everything mathematicians learned on the way there.. let AI jump straight to the answer and the whole journey disappears.. in 1976 Appel and Haken proved the four color theorem using a computer.. and many mathematicians refused to accept it because no human could check it by hand.. 50 years later the fear has flipped.. the computer is right.. but nobody understands WHY.. so Tao asks you one question.. if an AI cured cancer and passed every trial.. would you inject it before a single human understood how it works.. you spent centuries thinking math was about answers.. answers are now cheap.. understanding is the new scarce thing
169
141
50
894
99,571
So wonder why more people don’t speak up against wrongdoing and abuse of power? Just ask the whistleblowers and the truth tellers. pellemartens.substack.com/p/…
1
11
2
17
934
Thomas Drake retweeted
🇺🇸🇮🇷 While talks of a deal continue, Iran is now preparing for the possibility of a nuclear strike on its soil. The Iranian government just put every soldier, every militia fighter, and every IRGC unit on chemical, biological, and radiological alert. Fmr. U.S. Col. Larry Wilkerson says what looks like diplomacy is actually layered psychological warfare, with both sides running deception campaigns simultaneously. "Is Netanyahu going to get to the point that he's going to use a nuclear weapon? What's the difference between him doing what he says he will do with conventional weaponry and doing it with a nuclear weapon? There is not enough combat power in the area, nor can the United States marshal enough combat power to do that to a country as big as Western Europe, with 90 million plus people in it."
🇺🇸🇮🇷 New US strike plans reportedly put Iran's energy and nuclear sites on the list, and the world economy cracks long before Tehran does Washington's next round could reportedly hit Iran's energy and nuclear sites, and Israel's army chief reportedly says US officials told him a large attack may come within weeks. Col. Larry Wilkerson lays out what that buys... a country the size of Western Europe that bombing can't bring to its knees, trade squeezed from Hormuz to Bab el-Mandeb to Panama, where by his understanding Korean shippers paid a $4 million surcharge just for a canal slot. Long before anyone reaches for the top of the escalation ladder, he sees the world hitting a wall: "You're going to run into the world and you're going to run into it with no sulfur, no helium, no wheat, no crops, no diesel." Tehran already holds a nuclear weapon of COMMERCE, and a longer target list only tempts it to use more of it.
22
103
8
422
78,028
Thomas Drake retweeted
What a hill to die on. I’ll ask again. What is wrong with this president and why will no one in his own party take responsibility and do something about it?
Artificial Intelligence.
297
1,837
50
8,313
91,762
Thomas Drake retweeted
According to the President of the United States, I am now his enemy.
27
7
2
106
5,268
The greatest category error in history is thinking that a simulation of intelligence is the same as intelligence.
If the purpose of a system is what it does, the AI industry is a machine for extracting money, energy, and knowledge from the population, ad infinitum. I wrote about Sam Altman, “Claude’s Constitution,” and Fahrenheit 451. Please consider subscribing! mind-war.com/p/the-great-ext…
10
59
167
3,807
Reminds me of ALL the increasingly actionable ‘system is blinking red’ pre-9/11 intelligence indications and warnings of a major terrorist attack on the US. Including reports sent out (but ignored) just after the World Trade Center bombing on 26 Feb 1993, when I stood watch as a naval intelligence officer on the Terrorism Desk within the National Military Joint Intelligence Center at the Pentagon, that planes could be used as weapons in a return attempt to attack very visible US landmarks, including the WTC towers to ‘finish’ the job. Sadly the attacks were used to engage in an exceptionally expansive national security policy taking primacy in order to justify never letting a crisis (however tragic) go to waste with trillions spent on a permanent war footing, resulting in many millions killed and tens of millions displaced. npr.org/2026/10/07/g-s1-1467…
2
8
763