Tyler Meade (@TylerRMeade) profile picture
New York, NY
Joined November 2024
Photo by Tyler Meade (@TylerRMeade)
Tyler Meade retweeted
Tokenized stocks have arrived. Our customers in the EU can now buy tokenized Strategy (MSTR) on Gemini and take it anywhere onchain. 🇪🇺 We are starting with MSTR and will be rolling out more tokenized stocks and ETFs in the coming days.
193
245
140
967
795,002
Tyler Meade retweeted
We’ve partnered with @DinariGlobal, the leading provider of tokenized U.S. public securities, to offer our customers greater liquidity, transparency, and the same economic rights as the backing security, where permitted.
7
17
2
109
26,295
Wall street, without the wall
Tokenized stocks have arrived. Our customers in the EU can now buy tokenized Strategy (MSTR) on Gemini and take it anywhere onchain. 🇪🇺 We are starting with MSTR and will be rolling out more tokenized stocks and ETFs in the coming days.
19
15
2
90
28,570
1/ It's been a while since I've shared some product updates from @Gemini and we've been busy. Some highlights over the last few months below:
12
18
1
96
26,942
On Monday, the SEC informed our litigation counsel @JackBaughman27 that it has closed its investigation into @Gemini and will not be pursuing an enforcement action against us. This comes 699 days after the start of their investigation and 277 days after they sent us a Wells Notice. While this marks another milestone to the end of the war on crypto, which already includes the SEC’s withdrawal of the Coinbase lawsuit and the closing of investigations into OpenSea, Robinhood, and UniSwap, it does little to make up for the damage this agency has done to us, our industry, and America. The SEC cost us tens of millions of dollars in legal bills alone and hundreds of millions in lost productivity, creativity, and innovation. Of course Gemini is not alone. The SEC’s behavior in aggregate towards other crypto companies and projects cost orders of magnitude more and caused unquantifiable loss in economic growth for America. How many engineers left crypto or avoided it altogether because of these regulatory attacks? How many projects were never started or got off the ground because founders and engineers decided they would rather build a startup in their dorm room than inside the boardroom of a law firm trying to navigate the Kafkaesque crypto regulatory hellscape? How many engineers chose to go into other industries instead of building a permissionless, open financial system? How many years of innovation were kicked down the road at the expense of Americans? We will never know. So where do we go from here? It’s wholly unacceptable for an agency like the SEC to bully, harass, and attack a lawful industry and then decide one day to simply say we’re good and walk away. Unless there is a cost and price to be paid for this behavior, it will happen again. Thoughtful legislation will form a shield of protection, but we also need strong deterrence inside the agencies themselves. Here are a few ideas: Reimbursement If an agency refuses to write rules before it opens an investigation or brings an enforcement action, the agency should have to reimburse you for 3x your legal costs. This would make you financially whole for the time and money you spent defending yourself against sham investigations and baseless enforcement actions that were only able to be brought because the agency didn’t write rules in the first place. Even better, they should be required to advance you your legal costs so you don’t have to come out of pocket while you defend yourself. Dishonorable Discharge Everyone involved in these actions should be fired immediately and in a public way. Their names, roles, and the actions they participated in should be posted on the SEC website. How many SEC enforcement lawyers have resigned in protest since the SEC top brass instructed them to withdraw crypto cases and close investigations? Zero. Which means they never believed in these cases to begin with. Which begs the question, why didn’t these lawyers resign at the outset when they were told to bring these unjust cases? It should not be acceptable to bring the full might of the US government to bear against fledgling companies in a nascent industry and then hide behind a faceless agency or say you were “just doing your job” or “following orders.” These individuals had a choice. They could have asked to be reassigned or resigned. Nobody was forcing them to work at the SEC. Nonetheless, they chose to violate their oath and the agency’s mission to “make a positive impact on the U.S. economy, our capital markets, and people’s lives” and instead aided and abetted an unlawful war against a lawful industry. Imagine if even one SEC enforcement lawyer had resigned in protest and stood up for our industry — what a heroic act this would have been. But it never happened. Agency Ban Just like the SEC bars individuals from trading securities if they break the law, there should be a process that bars those like Gary Gensler who weaponize the law, as well those who participate in the weaponization, from ever being appointed to or hired by an agency again. Lifetime ban in this case. Going Forward We will not rebuild trust and integrity in federal agencies unless there are serious consequences for bad faith actors. Operation Chokepoint didn’t stop at 1.0. It continued to 2.0 because not enough was done to hold bureaucrats accountable for their actions during 1.0. And there will be a 3.0 unless there is a real, public reckoning for 2.0. I’m glad to be turning the page here as an industry, but this is not the end, rather the beginning towards ensuring this never happens again to the crypto industry or any other exciting, new frontier industry in the future. Here’s to continuing to reform our government and fighting the good fight. Amazing awaits
215
418
95
2,835
1,044,649
We were right. This was not a collective delusion. If they can do this to crypto they can do this to anyone.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Fed Chair Powell says he is "struck" at the growing number of cases of Bitcoin and crypto firms that were debanked and he is "determined to take a fresh look at that."
28
75
1
631
48,206
Great post (if you’re not familiar with Paul’s essays, go on his site and read a bunch! Some gems in there). Two things from this, 1. Our founders have direct relationships with folks across the firm at every level, and I like and encourage it. They will do stuff and connect directly with my reports and below outside of my purview - that is good! Engage directly with the people that matter for what you need to accomplish. Leads into my next point which is a recent interesting thing that happened to me 2. We recently hired someone from a similar business. Senior guy, was there many years. Said he’d only spoken to the coo once! I spent an hour in a file with him elbow to elbow directly working on it to finalize. And I thought to myself, am I doing something wrong that my peer doesn’t do this? but I think I’m doing something right. This person was also below the manager who reports to me
4
2
1
19
2,782
Kent and S 3rd in Williamsburg is the intersection where art becomes brand. The future is being built today
Our wall painting of the underwater scene is going live this week! If you’re in Williamsburg you can spot it on Kent and S 3rd.
6
4
1
34
22,575
There needs to be a “single action rule. Right now, when something goes wrong you can be investigated by multiple federal agencies and multiple state agencies, for the same thing. This is crazy. I have had clients investigated by the SEC, CFTC, OCC, FED, the New York AG, the Manhattan DA, and agencies of other states for the exact same conduct. This is insane. It is just regulators piling on and “taking a piece.” Sometimes things go wrong. And good regulation has its role. But we have lost the plot entirely.
Redundant agencies create inefficiency. Countless federal agencies cover the same “turf” which creates confusion (e.g. SEC/CFTC), many of them regulate activities that are *already regulated* by states (e.g. Nuclear Regulatory Commission), while others still take money from states only to give it back to states (e.g. Dept of Education). This is nonsensical. Restructuring isn’t an option, it’s a necessity.
11
21
5
126
207,478
People need to understand just how wrong this was. This is unelected bureaucrats picking winners and losers: choosing who gets to participate in the financial system. Imagine if the FDIC pressured banks not to offer services to your industry. Or to people who look like you.
Well done Coinbase in aggressively pursuing their FOIA action against the FDIC. That federal regulators engaged in a secret and concerted effort to de-bank crypto can no longer be doubted.
1
1
2
700
Law abiding American businesses should be able to access banking services without government interference. The incoming administration has the opportunity to reverse so many poor crypto policy decisions, chief among them politically motivated regulatory decisions like Operation Chokepoint 2.0. 3/3
9
28
3
352
31,064
Tyler Meade retweeted
JUST IN: U.S. banks were told to keep their distance from crypto, according to @FDICgov letters that @coinbase execs argue are a smoking gun proving that debanking was the government's plan. @jesseahamilton reports. trib.al/BR9LHjp
54
298
38
1,105
256,411
Tyler Meade retweeted
We believe in a better future @Gemini and we're here to help build it. Onward! 🚀
What will the future of money look like?
27
13
2
133
32,374