Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (@UncertaintyRisk) profile picture

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty https://teapawt.org/t.co/ed2YBeUH6z

Joined July 2023
New in the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty: “Ambiguity Attitudes and Beliefs in Strategic and Non-Strategic Interactions” by Dorobiala & Melkonyan. The results suggest ambiguity is ubiquitous in strategic interactions, with its role closely tied to strategic uncertainty.
1
1
1
61
Across 6 countries, a majority prefer human over algorithmic decision-makers. But explaining how algorithms use data reduces that gap by 11 percentage points—and positive prior experience can even reverse baseline preferences.
1
93
New in the JRU: “Stress discounting” by Cherbonnier, Gollier & Pommeret They propose “stress discounting”—valuing policies across BAU and catastrophic states to capture aggregate risk & insurance benefits. Application: nuclear waste disposal.
36
New research in the JRU: Born & Karl estimate the financial value parents place on children via life insurance demand. link.springer.com/article/10…
1
35
Check out the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty’s double issue tribute to Daniel Kahneman, featuring prominent scholars in his field! 👉link.springer.com/journal/11… 👉link.springer.com/journal/11…
2
6
1,675
New in the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty: Composto, Duncan, Johnson & Weber synthesize 27 studies on Query Theory. Results show framing effects arise from attentional shifts & query order—offering a process-based alternative to loss aversion in Prospect Theory.
1
1
133
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty retweeted
In Managed Expectations Theory (Zeckhauser & Viscusi, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty), ex ante likelihoods act as reference points shaping ex post utility—explaining why we underestimate good outcomes & overweight bad ones. link.springer.com/article/10…
1
3
3
2,544
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty retweeted
Read JRU article "Information Avoidance": Cavlovic, Koford & Rentschler test whether anticipated regret drives information avoidance. Their lab experiment finds that accuracy improves info uptake, but mitigation effects are weaker than expected link.springer.com/article/10…
3
3
1,333
Does the source of uncertainty change how we react to ambiguity? Lotito, Maffioletti & Santoni find in their JRU article that people are more ambiguity-averse for artificial uncertainty (Ellsberg paradox) than real-world risks like COVID-19.
1
1
1
111
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty retweeted
"The Gambler’s Fallacy Prevails in Lottery Play" by Dillon & Lybbert out now in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty! Analysis of lottery behavior in Haiti and Denmark reveals the prevalence of the gambler's fallacy and sheds light on beliefs around winning numbers. @Springernomics
1
1
7
273