Albert Renshaw retweeted
Geoffrey Hinton once noticed that the tellers at his bank kept changing. When he asked one of them why, the teller didn't know, only that they got moved around a lot.
Hinton guessed the reason... if staff never work with the same people for long, it's much harder for a few of them to team up and cheat the bank.
That thought became one of the most useful tricks in deep learning. While a neural network trains, you randomly switch off about half its neurons at every step. No neuron can lean on a particular partner, so each one has to learn something useful on its own. The trick is called dropout, and it helped AlexNet win the 2012 ImageNet contest, which set off the modern AI boom. It's still built into many of today's networks.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
PSA for macOS users:
1. Apple’s supplied SSL certificate bundle at /etc/ssl/cert.pem still trusts certificates attackers can forge using compromised eMudhra keys.
2. I confirmed this on macOS 26.7.1 and 27.0.1 using Apple’s built-in curl and Git.
3. An attacker intercepting connections from tools using this bundle could replace downloads with malware. With commands like curl … | sh, that malware would execute immediately.
4. Removing the roots that authorize those certificates blocks the tested chains. Both OS updates restored roots I’d previously removed, requiring me to remove them again.
4. I’ve submitted the findings to Apple’s security team and am awaiting their response. In the meantime, you can apply a temporary fix as outlined below.
5. To check and fix your machine, give an agent like ChatGPT/Codex or Claude Code the following prompt:
“Independently verify whether Apple’s /etc/ssl/cert.pem still permits trust in certificates signed with compromised eMudhra keys. If so, back it up and remove the roots enabling that trust, identified by verified SPKI fingerprints. Confirm Apple’s built-in curl and Git reject those chains while ordinary HTTPS still works. Preserve rollback and never disable TLS verification.”
Note that removing these roots can also block legitimate sites. This is a temporary mitigation, not a substitute for a fix from Apple.
I’ll share the script I used in a follow-up post if you’d prefer to use that directly.
PSA for Codex CLI users:
1. Codex 0.163.0’s release lockfile pins rustls-webpki 0.103.15 and root bundles that can still trust compromised eMudhra certificates.
2. An attacker intercepting your connection could impersonate a server, steal sensitive data, or alter responses, potentially tricking Codex into running malicious commands.
3. Codex 0.164.0, released October 23 at 12:48 a.m. ET, updates those dependencies to fixed versions.
4. To check your codex version run "codex --version". It should be at least 0.164.0.
5. To patch the vulnerability, run "codex update".
6. Apps that bundle their own Codex copy must also be checked.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
Wow.
For context, this is talkie, a LLM trained only on text written before 1930, I'm running it locally.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
‼️ After PHP2Shell comes Node2Shell, a critical bug found by OpenAI's Codex Security that can let attackers run code in Node.js apps.
It was successfuly demonstrated on the official Node.js 24.22.0 image.
Node 20, 23 and 25 (all EoL) get no fix.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
Things will continue to get worse until you finally realize that it is time to stop using dependencies
Albert Renshaw retweeted
Albert Renshaw retweeted
“Don’t smash it up, she’s a sister!”
This shop manager protecting her business is spared by the thugs out of Muslim solidarity.
Still absolutely no connection to immigration.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
The problem with this is that they’re literally going to say “ONLY one share?” and call you cheap. It happens every time someone gives away free money. There’s never an amount that’s enough.
Albert Renshaw retweeted
I’ve personally exited my body via my soul; so for me I 100% **KNOW** we have souls
But that does nothing to convince those who haven’t.
They smugly and arrogantly declare we are just brain chemicals and ignore the notion completely (even though that means they have no free will and all their behavior is technically deterministic)
Yet the truth is they don’t know if it’s soul or not soul
I do actually know; which is why I’m firm in my position (whereas they are in an unknown position but won’t admit it)… I’ve been on both sides of the aisle and has my stance forcibly changed by anecdotal evidence
Anecdotes are only valuable to the subject who experienced them
So while I know; I can’t convince others
But others who don’t know, act like they do know; which is frustrating
Medically documented NDEs is the best evidence I can point them to—whether they acknowledge them and account for them (even just the point of accepting that it’s possible) is up to them
Sadly many will never accept it as possible (even though their logical objectivism they claim to hold to dictates they must)… until they, too, experience separation from body





































