Lord of the southern berg

This argument comes up every so often. The answer is yes, I do want you to network locally with others who agree on the problems we face. No societal problem has ever been solved by a single individual. Nothing that has been worth doing has ever been done without human networks. To fail in building local networks is to fail twice: once by not trying, and again by being forced to face what's coming alone. There is of course the risk of bad actors and infiltration. First, that's a vetting and validation problem, which is largely solvable. (Vetting is an ongoing process, especially for intent and behavior.) Second, the person who shrieks "fed!" and "informant!" at every turn is one of two people: - either a scared individual who shields his own fear and inadequacy by encouraging others to be fearful and inadequate; or - someone who is deliberately trying to condition a belief of fear and learned helplessness in you. Atomization is the goal of the people who benefit the most from your continued inaction. Don't give them that advantage. 95% of the black pillers on this site are too chickenshit to talk to their neighbors, but they're the ones encouraging you to violence. Whether things get violent or not, you will need strong political and social networks to sustain your efforts. Study literally any low intensity conflict in human history. There has never once been a side that could have won if they only had less political power. No side that could have won if they only had less social power. If they only had less economic power. That power comes from one place: organization. Yes, you have to organize if you want to win. Yes, you actually have to talk to people. Yes, you have to close the X app and circulate in your community to attract the kind of support you want. Peace time networks form the basis for war time networks, whether your war is an election or an armed conflict. The time to build your networks is now.