Pinned Tweet
This reminds me of a fascinating story I read,of when in the 1970s Daniel Everett,a linguist and Christian went to the Amazon jungle to convert a tribe called the piraha people to Christianity and completely failed for one crazy reason šš
When Daniel Everett arrived with his wife and kids at the remote PirahĆ£ village in the Amazon, His mission was clearā¦learn their language,translate the New Testament,and convert this isolated hunter gatherer group to Christianity.
What he encountered instead was one of the most radical cultural and linguistic worldviews ever documented š.
From his experience,Everett eventually formalized what he called the āImmediacy of Experience Principleā. What this means in essence is the PirahĆ£ culture and grammar strongly constrain what can be meaningfully discussed or believedā¦to them,knowledge must be anchored in direct,personal observation or at most in the recent testimony of living people you know.
Things that happened long ago,that no one alive has seen,or that exist only in abstract or supernatural realms fall into the category of what they called xibipĆo (āgone out of experienceā). They donāt deny it outrightly.. to them, such things simply carry no weight and are not worth serious talk.
This principle shapes everything for them⦠and is why they have No creation myths or origin storis , No numbers beyond rough quantities like āa fewā or āmany.ā , No recursive embedding in grammar (you canāt easily say ākelvinās brotherās houseā ⦠you say two separate sentences). Their Stories and discourse stay tethered to the here and now.
Now Christian theology, by contrast, is built on precisely the kind of claims the PirahĆ£ worldview filters outā¦A distant creation,Miracles and events from thousands of years ago, A savior no living person has met, Salvation and afterlife described in ancient texts.
Everett tried ā¦He told them the story of Jesus..his birth,teachings,death,and resurrection. The PirahĆ£ listened politely,then asked the questions their language and culture demandedā¦
āHave you met this man?ā
āDid you see him?ā
āDid your father see him?ā
When Everett admitted he had not , that these events happened 2,000 years earlier and were known only through a book,the conversation effectively ended š.
āThatās interesting,ā some of them would say, treating the Gospel the same way they treated any other distant taleā¦as something outside lived experience, therefore irrelevant to how they live and what they believe.
Notice It wasnāt hostile rejection(like the one youād get from the people of the sentinel islands in India). It was epistemological incompatibility. The theology couldnāt even gain traction because their entire system of knowledge validation rejected second hand ancient testimony.
Everett kept trying for years. He failed to produce a usable Bible translation. Meanwhile, living among people who were profoundly content, generous, and empirically grounded ā¦with no concept of sin, eternal punishment, or a distant deity.
By 1982 he himself started havinv serious doubts about his beliefs and by 1985 he had quietly become an atheist. The man who had come to convert the PirahĆ£ had instead been āconvertedā by their way of seeing reality.š
As Everett later wrote and said in interviews, the deepest challenge wasnāt an argument against Christianity. It was living inside a culture where the very criteria for what counts as real knowledge made supernatural historical claims feel as weightless as yesterdayās dream.
The PirahĆ£ didnāt need to debate theology. Their language and worldview simply had no slot for it and, in the process, they helped a missionary lose his faith without ever raising their voices.š
Makes you wonder, what would a Christian say the fate of these people is? Eternal torment? We can all see how that would be problematic.
Would they somehow make heaven and get judged by how they live their lives? But That would make the whole Christian message irrelevant. š
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
If you surfed the early internet between 1995-2012 Whatās the one website/app you still think about that is no longer popular or no longer exist?
If you surfed the early internet between 1995-2012 Whatās the one website/app you still think about that is no longer popular or no longer exist?
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
By definition, God is supposed to be a perfectly complete, self-sufficient being who exists in a state of absolute perfection. He lacks nothing, needs nothing, and has no unrealized potential to fulfil. So what, exactly, would motivate such a being to create anything?
Motivation ordinarily arises from some desire, goal, or perceived good that has not yet been realized. But if God is already perfectly complete, what could creation possibly add to his existence that he did not already possess? If creation fulfils a need, God was not entirely self-sufficient before creating. If it satisfies a desire, then something was desired that was not yet actualized. And if creation changes Godās state for the better, then he was not already maximally perfect.
In other words , What could motivate a being who lacks nothing to do anything at all, and how can that motivation be reconciled with the claim that he was already perfectly complete?
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
āBlack cats are possessedā āblack birds are demonicā
- a black Man
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
Nothing vex girls with flat yansh when them see man wey get big bumbum. She go begin feel uncomfortable and think say the man dey oppress her š
š
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
The best friendships are with people who elevate ur mindset. Broaden ur perspective & introduce u to new hobbies & experiences
By definition, God is supposed to be a perfectly complete, self-sufficient being who exists in a state of absolute perfection. He lacks nothing, needs nothing, and has no unrealized potential to fulfil. So what, exactly, would motivate such a being to create anything?
Motivation ordinarily arises from some desire, goal, or perceived good that has not yet been realized. But if God is already perfectly complete, what could creation possibly add to his existence that he did not already possess? If creation fulfils a need, God was not entirely self-sufficient before creating. If it satisfies a desire, then something was desired that was not yet actualized. And if creation changes Godās state for the better, then he was not already maximally perfect.
In other words , What could motivate a being who lacks nothing to do anything at all, and how can that motivation be reconciled with the claim that he was already perfectly complete?
Fundamentally, .. there is no such thing as individual brilliance ⦠because an āindividualā is a collection of autonomous parts.
So in a sense āindividual brillianceā is collective autonomic neuronal intelligence.
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
Makes me so angry fr, cuz how special do you even think you are for a bird to give two fvcks about your spiritual wellbeing
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
Must be hard being a bird in this country
God is heavily with me.
Driving along Calabar by pass road. This bird sighted us, flew to the road, landed in the middle of the road.
When our vehicle approached, the power of God arrested this bird and it could not leave that spot again. I came down spoke few tongues and lifted it.
For those who do not know this bird, this is the bird that cries at midnight and is commonly used by the forces of darkness for different assignments.
~Pst Edidiong Sylvester
Kelvin O johnson retweeted
The Ballon dāOr is today, but honestly, the whole process is a farce.
If players are being judged on their performances last season, up until the end of the World Cup, there is absolutely no reason why voting should remain open six weeks into the new season. These so called āobjective journalistsā are human beings too, and they are just as susceptible to recency bias as anyone else.
Why not open voting immediately after the World Cup and close it just before the new season begins? That way, the award is based strictly on the performances it is supposed to recognise, rather than allowing early-season form to influence voters.
I say this because there is absolutely no reason why Lamine Yamal should be anywhere near Harry Kane in the betting odds if we are judging their performances over last season (and the World Cup)



















