VoC retweeted
Murdering babies isn't health care.
Replying to @RicWBuchanan @EricBurlison
If you think advocating for women's healthcare is evil, you're pretty twisted up morally.
VoC retweeted
is true even if their intentions are noble (which is doubtful at best, btw). Ultimately, many women and men in the pro-life movement are self-serving excusers of evil at worst or cowards afraid to tell the truth about abortion and who’s responsible for it at best.
VoC retweeted
Person you know that’s already struggling financially:
“I’m going to adopt a dog with chronic health issues.”
VoC retweeted
Replying to @Gravantus @_VoC__
Exactly. The pro-life movement isn’t just ineffective, it’s evil. By claiming that women, who get abortions are simply victims, who aren’t at fault, they’re excusing the actions of the perpetrators of the murder of the unborn. They’re defending evil, which makes them evil. That/1
I’m probably classified as a skeptic on this topic…
But wouldn’t a very easy and cogent counter-argument against these stats is that the only reason that these diseases are less dangerous than vaccines is because of widespread vaccination among them less prevalent?
Dr. Paul Thomas, MD: "You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule."
"There Is No Safe Vaccine On The Childhood Schedule... Period."
The statistical analysis of each vaccine...
The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion
The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K
The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million
The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K
The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million
The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K
The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million
The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K
The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million
The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K
The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million
The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K
The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible
The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K
The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million
The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K
The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million
The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K
The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K
The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K
The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million
The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K
The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K
The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K
The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K
The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K
The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K
The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K
**Statistical Facts From Dr. Paul Thomas' Book: "Vax Facts."**
83
VoC retweeted
The problem with the pro-life movement is that it is, through and through, a feminist movement. Until there is a concentrated effort to stigmatize it and say, "yeah, actually, if you get an abortion, you're low-class trash," nothing will change.
The inability to not treat women as perpetual victims, regardless of what they do, is a real problem. You can't say that the doctor is evil but the mother is an innocent cherub, beyond reproach, who was tricked into it.
This mindset is why you saw ostensibly "pro-life" women suddenly making excuses for Lindsey Clancy killing her kids.
Never:
Ask a woman her age
Ask a man what he makes
Ask a warlike people to your incredibly fertile land “just to help”
A.D. 443.
This year sent the Britons over sea to Rome, and begged assistance against the Picts; but they had none, for the Romans were at war with Atila, king of the Huns. Then sent they to the Angles, and requested the same from the nobles of that nation.
1
10
405
VoC retweeted
Law school & med school can’t coexist with feminism. They’re artificially supply-constrained, girls get over 55% of their slots, then girls wash out from being lawyers & doctors at *way* higher rates to start families, but still fail at starting families *way* more than bimbos do
VoC retweeted
The majority of California Latinx hate Spain, the Spanish empire and the Conquistadors and larp as Aztecs. They were the main reason many of the statues in the state commemorating Spanish figures have been torn down.
VoC retweeted
I wrote a thing yesterday about noblesse oblige being part of the ethos of the historic European aristocracy. (accelerationist.substack.com…)
When the French explorer Savorgnan de Brazza saw the slavery and slave-trading going on among African tribes in the Congo, he had a giant French flag put up outside his camp and decreed that, by the authority of France, any slave who touched that flag was henceforth free.
VoC retweeted
The only two US diocese that produce enough priest to keep their own dioceses filled, are the only two were women can’t altar serve.
The Unbearable Lightness of Being
Johnathan Livingston Seagull
The Scarlet Letter
The House of Seven Gables
The Grapes of Wrath
The Pearl
Beloved
The Sun Also Rises
A Separate Peace
Sense and Sensibility
Silas Marner
The Prophet
And this is just off the top of my head
I have been asked several times what “classics” are actually crap. Here is a list (by no means exhaustive):
Jane Eyre
Wuthering Heights
Great Expectations
David Copperfield
Orlando
Ulysses
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
Finnegans Wake
Atonement
The Stranger
VoC retweeted
Communists and other leftists DO NOT BELIEVE lying for electoral advantage is morally wrong.
This shouldnt be news.
Before the 2012 election, then Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid falsely accusing GOP nominee Mitt Romney of paying zero taxes for ten years.
This was a disgusting lie.
When called on it years later before he retired, Reid justified his lie by saying "Romney didn’t win, did he?”
Leftist leaders firmly believe in lying to their voters.
And worse, their voters think their leaders lying to them makes said leaders clever.
VoC retweeted
When stating the number of one's sins, there are four degrees of precision that one can use.
1. Exact number ("I sinned X times"). This is self-explanatory.
2. Probable number ("I sinned around X times"). This is used when you are generally aware of the number but have some doubt as to the exact number.
3. Conjectural number ("I sinned around X times per Y period," e.g., per day, week, month, etc.). This is used when an approximation of the total number is unclear, but the frequency can be estimated.
4. Confused number ("I habitually/often/occasionally sinned for Y period," e.g., 3 months, 10 years, etc.). This is used when the frequency can only be stated in general terms, but the length of time can be estimated.
The fourth is especially useful for those living in some immoral lifestyle (e.g., "I lived in concubinage for 2 years"), where the frequency cannot be reliably approximated.
There is no need to be anxious about estimating the number of sins for confession. If you do your best and seriously consider the number of times you have sinned, you're completely fine. Being able to distinguish between these types of numbers and use them in confession will be of great help in relieving your anxiety. The greatest moralists have approved these methods, and they have been in use for centuries.

































