daily 1%. building @appliedcompute. prev co-founder Sentinel (YC), @twosigma, @harvard

SF
Joined October 2011
Bryan Lee retweeted
Introducing auto-mode for Claygent. It picks the AI model for each row of research, balancing answer quality AND cost. Now on by default for new Claygent columns: - 47% cheaper than sending every task to the most capable model. - <1 second to choose the model for each research task. - You can still pick your favorite model anytime. Super cool thing: We post-trained an open-weight model with @appliedcompute to handle the routing. It runs on their AC2 platform and handles hundreds of millions of queries a month. @jeffbarg, Vyshnavi, @rhythmrg, and @_brylee10 break it down below.
4
15
10
86
11,553
Excited to share what we’ve been cooking with Clay! It’s been great collaborating with Clay and @jeffbarg on training the router for Claygent auto mode. Claygent has handled 5B queries and counting. Training domain specific routers has significant performance and latency headroom. Just scratching the surface of what’s possible here!
Claygent, @clay’s AI agent for GTM research, has processed over 5 billion queries.Claygent doesn’t need to use frontier models for every query. Smaller alternatives can be more cost effective and lower latency. We trained and served a specialized router to pick the right model for each task, cutting inference costs by 47% with no impact on answer quality.
1
17
572
I implemented a system in @appliedcompute’s platform for automated failure mode clustering with Jev to surface errors at an even larger scale than before. RL training produces billions of tokens in traces. I always manually read many traces to understand model behavior, but finding agent failures (like reward hacking / hallucinations) at scale is easy to miss without automation. Here’s how it works:
25
12
9
259
72,324
Jev has the lowest cost and the best calibrated scores (brier score / expected calibration error), so setting a low decision threshold makes it a high-recall first pass filter which a second high precision model can refine.
3
20
1,361
at AC we have our own rule of 3, three strikes and you platformitize. if researchers do the same workflow multiple times, we automate it in our platform AC2 AC2 supports features like auto research agents, training trillion parameter models, and highly scalable inference deployments. today we’re sharing AC2 with the world!
Today, we're introducing AC2, the Applied Compute Agent Cloud, to enable every team to train, serve, and improve their own frontier models.
2
24
1,680
We partnered with @harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.
1
10
7
92
27,898
Replying to @nvidia
@nvidia’s Nemotron 3 Ultra handles software-engineering tasks at a fraction of the per-task cost of frontier models. So we trained a router to send each coding task to the cheapest model that can successfully solve it, cutting inference cost while holding frontier-level quality. The result: GPT-5.5-level pass rates on held-out SWE-bench Verified at ~25% lower cost. The oracle policy sends 72% of tasks to Nemotron 3 Ultra, and the trained router captures most of that.
9
15
8
95
41,168
Enterprise AI deployments today are frozen in time. Model capabilities stagnate in production. The problem compounds because companies aren’t static either. Every time your company improves, the model falls further behind. The bottleneck is continual learning. How does a model do something once and improve from feedback? The future of enterprise AI is Specific Intelligence: custom models teams own, trained on a company’s choices, interaction by interaction, using internal knowledge general models cannot access. Applied Compute helps companies train, serve, own, and improve custom models. Thanks @apoorv03 for having @ypatil125 at MS&E 435 to talk about the future of model training.
3
12
2
45
12,900
at AC i’ve learned forward deployed work is among my favorite. a personal favorite memory was getting a high five from a customer after a day in the office and a successful prod deployment. closely collaborating with companies and diving into the nitty-gritty of their systems to make agents work is challenging but rewarding. it’s “full stack” in the sense it involves a eng, research, and understanding customer needs which makes each day different and gets me excited.
There is a large delta between what models can do and what they deliver in company-specific workflows. We bridge that gap through forward deployment. In a given week, our engineers might build eval frameworks from scratch, deploy a large-scale context ingestion engine, and present results to F500 leadership. We fine-tune models on proprietary data no frontier lab has seen and optimize agent performance against real-world outcomes. We're excited by engineers with rigor, high customer empathy, and a bias toward action in ambiguity. appliedcompute.com/blog/unlo…
4
23
2,952
We partnered with @DoorDash to train a proprietary RL-powered agent that encodes internal QA standards into an automated grader, turning expert judgment into a scalable training signal. The result: a 30% relative reduction in critical menu errors and a production system now live across all US menu traffic. appliedcompute.com/case-stud…
14
6
159
74,831
Ready to ship
Generalists are useful, but it’s not enough to be smart. Advances come from specialists, whether human or machine. To have an edge, agents need specific expertise, within specific companies, built on models trained on specific data. We call this Specific Intelligence. It's what we're building at Applied Compute. We unlock the latent knowledge inside a company, use it to train custom models, and deploy an in-house agent workforce that reports to your team. We work with sophisticated companies that have already captured early gains from general models, like @cognition, @DoorDash, and @mercor. They’re pulling even further ahead with proprietary in-house agents that don’t need to wait for the next public model release. Together, we are building and validating models and agents in days instead of months, achieving state-of-the-art performance on customer evals. Our team has high density and low latency. Our founders all worked on different parts of this problem while they were researchers at OpenAI — @ypatil125 as a key member on the agentic software engineer effort (Codex), @rhythmrg as a core contributor to the first RL-trained reasoning model (o1), and @lindensli as a core contributor on ML systems and infrastructure for RL training. Two-thirds of the team are former founders, and everyone brings a deep technical background, from top AI researchers to Math Olympiad winners. We are backed by $80M in funding from Benchmark, Sequoia, Lux, Elad Gil, Victor Lazarte, Omri Casspi, and others. With their support, we are growing the team, scaling deployments, and bringing to market the first generation of agent workforces built on specific models. In short: 1. We are building Specific Intelligence for specific work at specific companies. 2. That will power in-house agent workforces to support their human bosses. 3. That in turn will unlock AI’s full potential through humanity’s greatest engine of progress: thriving corporations in a free market.
2
1
9
1,921
the scale on this gpt-5 graph is puzzling, 50 < 47?
539
just paid for comet. never thought I'd pay for a browser
2
326
astronomer writes 50% of the airflow code airflow iff astronomer
2
322