Let’s have an honest conversation about @fundingpips. 👇 I keep seeing traders saying they were banned for no reason, blaming @Khldfx, and calling the firm unfair over CID, KYC, and forged-document issues. But here’s a question worth asking: Are we looking at both sides of the story? If you knowingly broke a rule, made a mistake, or did something you weren't allowed to do, why wait until payout time to raise the issue? Why buy more challenges instead of contacting support when it happens? And if you're unsure whether something is allowed, why not ask BEFORE doing it? The rules are published on the website. Read them, understand them, and ask questions when in doubt. And if a violation happened years ago, ask yourself: did you inform the firm at the time, or only after action was taken? Of course, firms must also be transparent, explain their decisions, and treat traders fairly. Accountability goes BOTH ways. Real question for the community: If you know you've broken a rule, should you report it immediately—or wait until the firm catches it? Let's discuss respectfully. 🤝👇

MY FINAL FUNDINGPIPS UPDATE - AND AN IMPORTANT WARNING FOR TRADERS.🚨🚨🚨 I highly suspect that using the 20% first-purchase discount across multiple historical accounts may have contributed to the CID flag that led to my termination. FundingPips has not explicitly confirmed this, so I cannot say for certain. But there is high chance that this is the compliance concern that they cannot disclose Here is the context I feel has been overlooked. I once passed both phases on one of the 3 multiple accounts , when I attempted KYC in my own name, the account was flagged. Support then told me that only one account could undergo KYC. I was naive about the implications of having multiple registrations before that incident. That was when I first understood the one-account, one-KYC restriction. From then on, I continued using my main account. Before purchasing my newer challenges, I also disclosed my historical account situation and followed the instructions I received. I passed both phases, reached the Master Account, i DID alll this to only get terminated and banned before receiving my biggest payout till date . YES its damm painful ..traders will understand I understand that firms have compliance rules. My question is why my disclosure, cooperation, and subsequent conduct were not enough to warrant reconsideration. ? I never let anyone else use my accounts, and I never used another person’s account on my device. To OTHER traders: please be careful about using first-purchase discount codes across multiple registrations. I suspect this may have played a role in my case, but I cannot confirm that it is the reason for my CID flag. ‼️‼️🚨🚨🚨 @FundingPips - @Khldfx @avikkfp @avikkfp I still genuinely hope you will reconsider my case, reinstate my account, and reconsider my payout in light of the full timeline. I never wanted a fight. I wanted a fair chance to have my circumstances heard. Heart fully Thank you to everyone who supported me. ❤️

I’ve been stuck on a KYC issue for a while now. A lot has happened these past few months that I don’t want to put online but I’ve already lost time, money and a lot of mental energy over something that should’ve been simple to fix. I’m still here trying to move forward. Having qualifications doesn’t mean you’re always right. Even compliance teams can make mistakes. The real test is whether a firm is transparent, takes responsibility and actually gives traders a fair chance to resolve things before closing their accounts. @Khldfx Please personally look into this issue. Traders deserve fairness, transparency and a chance to resolve KYC issues before account closure. Thank you to everyone who takes the time to read and share this. I appreciate it. ❤️

Interesting how you’re responding to claims I never even made. Did I ever deny logging into another person’s account? No. Did I ever tweet “falsely banned for CID”? No. So where exactly are these quotes coming from? 😂 And this “one of the strongest risk systems in the industry” argument… does it only start working when someone passes a big account? 🤔 I purchased 15+ accounts, passed multiple evaluations, received Master Accounts, and got 2–3 small payouts, yet this historical issue only became a problem after I passed a $100K account. If your system is so strong, shouldn’t it flag violations when they happen, rather than months later? Or does the risk system suddenly become more powerful when the account size gets bigger? 😂 I always stuck to smaller prop firm accounts because I had concerns about what might happen with larger ones. But you know what? You guys made me part of your “Labs Experiment” in a completely different way. I didn’t experiment with your account, you experimented on me. 🤷🏻‍♀️ At this point, I’m genuinely curious: is your risk system designed to detect violations, or to wait for traders to buy big accounts and then pass bigger accounts first? If it’s that powerful, why did it take so long to notice? Does it need a $100K account to wake up? 😂 I never denied the facts. I’m questioning the timing and consistency of enforcement. There’s a difference. Maybe address that instead of arguing against statements I never made.

Purchased @fundingpips lab account my life's First 100k Account let's see if i will be able to handle it or not 👀 @Khldfx wish me luckkkkkk

Nigga , you've withdrawn 4 dollars 😂😂😂