Robtimus retweeted
A GYM OWNER IN GUANGZHOU REPLACED TWO BOUNCERS WITH A $14,000 ROBOT GUARD… TWO GUYS DECIDED TO TEST IT
They didn't want to pay for a membership and said "that tin can won't do anything"
The first one swung. Block, grab and a hip throw in 1 second
The second came from behind. A lean, a strike and he's on the floor
The first got up and went for a kick. The robot parried and answered with a spin
9 seconds. Two guys down. Not a scratch on the frame
The owner says he saves $3,000 a month on security, and now everyone buys a membership without arguing
Would you risk skipping the fee?
Elon Musk said on Tesla's earnings call that Optimus's biggest rival is China, and 32 gearboxes inside one robot show why this is sht
→ A planetary gearbox is a sun gear in the middle, several planets around it and a ring on the outside. Every tooth shares the load at once
→ That is why it reaches 92 to 97% efficiency and lives past 10,000 hours, which a leg needs on every step
→ Fourier packs 32 of these into one humanoid. The flexible spline that makes harmonic drives so hard to copy is not needed here
→ One robot takes 25 to 50 reducers, so any discount gets multiplied by that number
→ China built about 85% of the 14,400 humanoids that shipped last year. Chinese harmonic drives already sell at 40 to 60% of the Japanese price
→ Add about 90% of motor magnet capacity and 40% of bearing capacity, and the whole drivetrain gets built in one region
→ Musk said Optimus will win on intelligence and hands. Legs will be decided by price
→ My forecast: planetary gearboxes take legs and hips, harmonic stays in wrists and fingers, and whoever sells 25 reducers the cheapest sets the price of the whole robot
A GYM OWNER IN GUANGZHOU REPLACED TWO BOUNCERS WITH A $14,000 ROBOT GUARD… TWO GUYS DECIDED TO TEST IT
They didn't want to pay for a membership and said "that tin can won't do anything"
The first one swung. Block, grab and a hip throw in 1 second
The second came from behind. A lean, a strike and he's on the floor
The first got up and went for a kick. The robot parried and answered with a spin
9 seconds. Two guys down. Not a scratch on the frame
The owner says he saves $3,000 a month on security, and now everyone buys a membership without arguing
Would you risk skipping the fee?
Europe’s new robot law lands in 90 days and this is f*cking scary: there is still no finished safety standard for a robot that falls when you switch it off
Tesla’s biggest leg actuator was rated at 8,000 N, and a machine standing on legs cannot simply stop when something goes wrong
1. Cut power on a wheeled robot and it stays where it is. Cut power on a biped and it collapses. A falling humanoid of 70 kg or more is a serious injury risk for anyone next to it
2. The EU Machinery Regulation starts applying on January 20, 2027. The standard written for exactly this kind of robot, ISO 25785-1, was still a committee draft in the latest sources I found. Companies have to prove safety without a finished rulebook
3. Today’s answers are a controlled descent or a kneeling pose with zero energy, or a locked safe mode where joints freeze and balance stays active. My take is that every one of them needs extra torque reserve, redundant sensors and brakes in every joint, and that cost lands on the same legs everyone is trying to make cheaper
My bet is that the first humanoid with a certified safe fall will matter more than the first one that walks faster
Until then every factory pilot runs on exceptions and waivers, and the rules will be written by whoever has the most robots on the floor
Robtimus retweeted
24 YEAR OLD COACH IN SHANGHAI BOUGHT A $9,000 ROBOT TO BE HER SPARRING PARTNER… AT SECOND 6 IT THREW HER
â–¸ She walked in barefoot and in a dress because she thought it was a 10 minute test
â–¸ It blocked her hook. It dodged the high kick just by leaning back
â–¸ Then a leg sweep, a grab from behind and a hip throw nobody taught it
â–¸ She landed on her back. The robot rode the momentum, flipped over itself and faceplanted
â–¸ She says in 3 weeks it watched 400 hours of fight footage from her gym on its own
It won the round. Then instantly lost to gravity
Would you step in the ring with it?
24 YEAR OLD COACH IN SHANGHAI BOUGHT A $9,000 ROBOT TO BE HER SPARRING PARTNER… AT SECOND 6 IT THREW HER
â–¸ She walked in barefoot and in a dress because she thought it was a 10 minute test
â–¸ It blocked her hook. It dodged the high kick just by leaning back
â–¸ Then a leg sweep, a grab from behind and a hip throw nobody taught it
â–¸ She landed on her back. The robot rode the momentum, flipped over itself and faceplanted
â–¸ She says in 3 weeks it watched 400 hours of fight footage from her gym on its own
It won the round. Then instantly lost to gravity
Would you step in the ring with it?
This is getting f*cking scary for JAPAN: robot reducers got 68% cheaper in 3 years and that is only the first DOMINO
→ Every joint in a humanoid needs one. Reports put it at 10 to 20 precision reducers per robot, so a price drop hits the whole machine at once
→ One estimate shows the same spec part going from RMB 1,280 in 2023 to RMB 410 in 2026. That is roughly $120 saved per reducer and up to $2,400 per robot at 20 of them
→ Japan feels it first. Harmonic Drive Systems reportedly blamed Chinese price pressure for a 10% revenue drop last quarter
→ A cycloidal drive is the other path. Two discs roll on 16 pins and there is no thin steel cup flexing millions of times. It is also much stiffer than a harmonic drive at the same torque. In my view simple pins and discs scale faster than anything that has to flex
→ Once reducers stop being the expensive part, the money fight moves to the next bottleneck. Roller screws, magnets and hands are already lining up
→ I expect China to take arms and neck first while Japan keeps hips and knees a bit longer. After that it is a race to the cheapest joint on Earth
A 35 YEAR OLD ENGINEER IN CHINA BUILT A FLYING MACHINE FOR $200 OUT OF AN OIL DRUM AND FLEW IT ACROSS AN ENTIRE VALLEY
His name is Li and he spent 8 years repairing drones at a factory in Shenzhen
→ an old blue drum from his garage became the cockpit
→ he pulled 4 motors off scrapped farm drones
→ bought used batteries at the market for $15 each
→ the controller is from a regular quadcopter
His neighbours laughed for 3 months while he tested it over a field every evening
Then one sunset he just lifted off the ridge and flew across the whole valley to his parents' village
By car that trip takes 2 hours
In the drum it took 11 minutes
Now people from all over the province show up offering $5000 for a copy
He says he'll build a second one only for his mom
Elon Musk admitted something f*cking scary: Optimus is "the hardest product to scale" and the reason hides in 14 screws nobody talks about
→ Each of those screws sits inside a leg or arm actuator. A motor spins a nut and rotation turns into a straight push
→ A ring of rollers walks around the screw like planets. They touch the thread along a full line instead of one point, so a small actuator carries loads that would chew through a ball screw
→ That is why Tesla put it in the joints that hold the weight of the whole robot
→ Here is the catch. Every thread has to be ground to microns and the stack has to mesh with almost zero backlash
→ A roller screw costs several times more than a ball screw and very few factories on Earth can build them in volume. Musk said the supply chain had to be built out entirely, and this is the part he meant
→ Now do the math. 14 screws per robot on a line built for 1M robots a year means 14 million precision screws every 12 months
→ Nobody has ever made that many. If Tesla cracks the cost, a $20,000 humanoid becomes real. If it doesn't, the most advanced robot factory ever built will sit waiting for threads
Robtimus retweeted
MY CAT HUNTED A $1,200 ROBOT FOR 3 DAYS AND ON THE FOURTH NIGHT THE ROBOT FOUGHT BACK
I bought a six legged XGO to film my cat while I'm away
→ day one the cat just stared
→ day two it knocked him over twice
→ day three it dragged him under the couch and kept him there for 40 minutes
So I loaded DOOM on his screen and took the controls myself
Now every evening it's a duel of 6 legs against 4 and the score is 11 to 9 for the cat
The funniest part is the robot now walks around the flat avoiding every spot where the cat likes to sit
Nobody taught him that
MY CAT HUNTED A $1,200 ROBOT FOR 3 DAYS AND ON THE FOURTH NIGHT THE ROBOT FOUGHT BACK
I bought a six legged XGO to film my cat while I'm away
→ day one the cat just stared
→ day two it knocked him over twice
→ day three it dragged him under the couch and kept him there for 40 minutes
So I loaded DOOM on his screen and took the controls myself
Now every evening it's a duel of 6 legs against 4 and the score is 11 to 9 for the cat
The funniest part is the robot now walks around the flat avoiding every spot where the cat likes to sit
Nobody taught him that
Robtimus retweeted
IN 2012 BERKELEY PROVED A LIZARD'S TAIL CAN SAVE A ROBOT IN MID AIR AND STILL NOT A SINGLE HUMANOID HAS ONE
→ lizards swing their tail mid jump to level their body without touching the ground
Berkeley engineers copied it on a small robot called Tailbot and it stopped flipping in flight
a tail is the cheapest stabilizer there is: one motor and the robot controls how its body rotates
→ humanoids balance only with legs and arms, so after a push they always need a step
a tail would catch the fall before landing, but it adds weight at the back, another actuator and a zone where it can hit a person
a swinging tail next to a kid is a whole separate certification problem
→ so tails will show up on robots that don't need to look human: quadrupeds for ruins, mountains and rescue work
humanoids will keep the human shape because they'll work in human rooms
and creatures with tails and claws will live in labs behind glass for a long time
lizards have known this trick for millions of years, science wrote it down in 2012
IN 2012 BERKELEY PROVED A LIZARD'S TAIL CAN SAVE A ROBOT IN MID AIR AND STILL NOT A SINGLE HUMANOID HAS ONE
→ lizards swing their tail mid jump to level their body without touching the ground
Berkeley engineers copied it on a small robot called Tailbot and it stopped flipping in flight
a tail is the cheapest stabilizer there is: one motor and the robot controls how its body rotates
→ humanoids balance only with legs and arms, so after a push they always need a step
a tail would catch the fall before landing, but it adds weight at the back, another actuator and a zone where it can hit a person
a swinging tail next to a kid is a whole separate certification problem
→ so tails will show up on robots that don't need to look human: quadrupeds for ruins, mountains and rescue work
humanoids will keep the human shape because they'll work in human rooms
and creatures with tails and claws will live in labs behind glass for a long time
lizards have known this trick for millions of years, science wrote it down in 2012
Robtimus retweeted
A HUMANOID TRAINED ON THOUSANDS OF HOURS OF VIDEO WITH NORMAL PEOPLE HAS 0 EXAMPLES OF A FRAME LIKE THIS AND IT WILL STILL HAVE AN ANSWER
â–¸ robots learn the world from video of people behaving normally
engineers call everything outside that range out of distribution
the model doesn't say "I don't know", it confidently picks the closest familiar thing and a snake on a shoulder becomes a scarf or a strand of hair
â–¸ a confident mistake is more dangerous than an honest "I don't know"
in 2016 Autopilot failed to tell a white truck trailer from a bright sky and that story ended in a fatal crash
for a humanoid standing next to a person in a kitchen the cost of that mistake is even higher
â–¸ so home robots will need a dedicated uncertainty mode: stop, step back and call a human
I think that's the button regulators will check first, before speed or strength
0 examples in the data and 100% confidence in the answer is the scariest combo for a robot next to people
A HUMANOID TRAINED ON THOUSANDS OF HOURS OF VIDEO WITH NORMAL PEOPLE HAS 0 EXAMPLES OF A FRAME LIKE THIS AND IT WILL STILL HAVE AN ANSWER
â–¸ robots learn the world from video of people behaving normally
engineers call everything outside that range out of distribution
the model doesn't say "I don't know", it confidently picks the closest familiar thing and a snake on a shoulder becomes a scarf or a strand of hair
â–¸ a confident mistake is more dangerous than an honest "I don't know"
in 2016 Autopilot failed to tell a white truck trailer from a bright sky and that story ended in a fatal crash
for a humanoid standing next to a person in a kitchen the cost of that mistake is even higher
â–¸ so home robots will need a dedicated uncertainty mode: stop, step back and call a human
I think that's the button regulators will check first, before speed or strength
0 examples in the data and 100% confidence in the answer is the scariest combo for a robot next to people
Robtimus retweeted
THIS GUY JUST LOST TO A ROBOT THAT BY SAFETY RULES ISN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO PRESS ON A HUMAN HAND HARDER THAN 14 KG
→ years in the gym, protein, perfect technique, and all of it loses to a motor that didn't even strain
the robot has no fatigue, no pain and no moment where the arm says "enough"
→ the scary part isn't even the loss
the ISO rule for robots around people caps hand contact at 140 N and to win the robot has to blow right past it
so what's on stage is a machine that was allowed to break the rules for a show
→ and it only gets worse for the ego
humanoid strength will get capped in software like German cars capped at 250 km/h but one checkbox in the settings removes any limit
today it's arm wrestling at an expo, tomorrow the same robot hands you a coffee and you have no idea which box is ticked
THIS GUY JUST LOST TO A ROBOT THAT BY SAFETY RULES ISN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO PRESS ON A HUMAN HAND HARDER THAN 14 KG
→ years in the gym, protein, perfect technique, and all of it loses to a motor that didn't even strain
the robot has no fatigue, no pain and no moment where the arm says "enough"
→ the scary part isn't even the loss
the ISO rule for robots around people caps hand contact at 140 N and to win the robot has to blow right past it
so what's on stage is a machine that was allowed to break the rules for a show
→ and it only gets worse for the ego
humanoid strength will get capped in software like German cars capped at 250 km/h but one checkbox in the settings removes any limit
today it's arm wrestling at an expo, tomorrow the same robot hands you a coffee and you have no idea which box is ticked
Robtimus retweeted
SINCE AUGUST 2, 2026 ARTICLE 50 OF THE AI ACT SAYS A MACHINE HAS TO TELL YOU IT'S A MACHINE AND ANDROIDS LIKE THIS WILL BE THE FIRST TO STRESS TEST THAT RULE
→ the law has a loophole because you don't have to disclose if it's already obvious you're dealing with AI
with a metal body it's obvious, with a lifelike face, hair and expressions it isn't
→ the more realistic the robot the faster the brain stops treating it as a device
and a person who forgets they're talking to a machine trusts it more than they should
→ so the next move for regulators will target design rather than software
a mandatory mark on the body, a spoken disclosure at the start of every conversation and a ban on copying real people's looks
article 50 was written with chatbots in mind but it'll be tested on robots with faces
SINCE AUGUST 2, 2026 ARTICLE 50 OF THE AI ACT SAYS A MACHINE HAS TO TELL YOU IT'S A MACHINE AND ANDROIDS LIKE THIS WILL BE THE FIRST TO STRESS TEST THAT RULE
→ the law has a loophole because you don't have to disclose if it's already obvious you're dealing with AI
with a metal body it's obvious, with a lifelike face, hair and expressions it isn't
→ the more realistic the robot the faster the brain stops treating it as a device
and a person who forgets they're talking to a machine trusts it more than they should
→ so the next move for regulators will target design rather than software
a mandatory mark on the body, a spoken disclosure at the start of every conversation and a ban on copying real people's looks
article 50 was written with chatbots in mind but it'll be tested on robots with faces
Robtimus retweeted
A CHAMELEON'S TONGUE CATCHES A FLY AT 264 G AND NO HUMANOID IS EVEN CLOSE YET
→ the chameleon doesn't fire its tongue with muscle directly but with elastic tissue that loads up like a spring and dumps all the energy at once
that's why a tiny lizard beats any electric motor on power per kilo
→ robots hit a different wall because a motor gives you speed or force and rarely both
and the slowest link isn't even the arm but the camera that has to see the fly first
one extra frame of delay and the fly is gone
→ so labs are copying animals with spring latches, soft artificial muscles and event cameras that react to motion instead of waiting for a frame
whoever squeezes that into a humanoid's hands gets a robot that catches a falling glass instead of just posing for the camera
264 G is lunch for a lizard, and for humanoids the reflex is still the hardest part







