Mo retweeted
If the choice is a Kennedy Center that exists to glorify The Leader or no Kennedy Center at all, I would of course pick the latter. It's not like we need a federal art venue to have art.
Mo retweeted
Replying to @ModeledBehavior
Mo retweeted
BREAKING: The CEO of IKEA was just elected Prime Minister of Sweden.
The first thing he'll do is to assemble his cabinet.
Mo retweeted
Whenever the old Soviet Union was in chaos, they'd order state TV to run old opera or ballet programming 24/7 to distract the masses and ensure that the govt chaos did not seep into the news...
Mo retweeted
Trump listed Ecuador as a currency manipulator even though Ecuador’s currency is…the US dollar
Mo retweeted
Why stop here? Hear me out. A single BNPL contract for a burrito is incredibly risky. Anyone willing to pay for a burrito in installments can't be trusted to pay their debt. But what if...we pooled the payments together? The risk would go away.
DoorDash, $DASH, and Klarna have signed a deal where customers can choose to pay for food deliveries in interest-free installments
Mo retweeted
Fuck it. Josh Brown reading the J.P Morgan research note on the US Stock Market set to the Battle Hymn of the Republic
Mo retweeted
JUST SENT: FIRE has written to @DHSgov, @TheJusticeDept, @ICEgov, and @StateDept, requesting answers to the questions surrounding Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest and detention.
The government hasn't stated the legal basis for its actions, and it has put out statements suggesting Mr. Khalil is being targeted because of his constitutionally protected speech.
This is America. The administration must not use immigration enforcement to punish and filter out ideas disfavored by the government or deny due process to anyone facing arrest and detention.
The government must also be transparent about the basis for its actions to avoid chilling protected speech.
To be clear, demonstrations on Columbia’s campus since Oct. 7, 2023, have included both constitutionally protected speech and unlawful conduct. But the government has not clarified the factual or legal basis for Mr. Khalil’s arrest.
The lack of clarity is chilling protected expression, as other permanent residents cannot know whether their lawful speech could be deemed to “align” with a terrorist organization and jeopardize their immigration status.
FIRE’s letter demands answers:
➡️ What was the specific legal and factual basis for Mr. Khalil’s arrest on March 8?
➡️ What is the specific legal and factual basis for Mr. Khalil’s detention?
➡️ What is the specific legal and factual basis on which the government is seeking revocation of Mr. Khalil’s green card?
➡️ Will Mr. Khalil be afforded the due process protections required by U.S. law?
➡️ Is it the government’s intention to seek the revocation of lawful immigration status on the basis of speech protected by the First Amendment?
FIRE has requested a response tomorrow, March 11th.


























