TomBombadil

We're not here to talk about incremental improvements. We're here to talk about total transformation. We've set clear, aggressive, and achievable targets that define our path forward. Rome was not built in one day. But MultiversX is reaching to SuperNova upgrade in a few weeks. SuperNova, growth.

Wow. That was a sophisticated attack which shows that a state sponsored actor has the ability to circumvent a bunch of security practices and inject malicious code into microservices, transaction generators, applications. How safe do you think the centralised sequencers/L2s really are - all of those have upgradable contracts via multiSig and insanely big honeypots? “Verifying that the transaction you are signing will result in the intended outcome remains one of the biggest security challenges in Web3, and this is not just a user and education problem — it is an industry-wide issue that demands collective action. While self-custody comes with individual responsibility, in order to drive broad adoption platforms must play a critical role by providing better tooling to detect and prevent malicious interference. We need significant UX improvements that simplify secure transaction management.” Your own keys, your own funds is true only when the user can actually verify what he is signing. But it should not be about using 3 more tools, but to natively integrated code which runs in the users system which deciphers the txData and explains that in plain english, also a fairly easily understandable txData is a must and can be done. Actually all that exists on MvX. We were always at the forefront of TRUE security. Invested a lot to eliminate all knows hacks, bugs, minefields, because it is the responsibility of the protocol to do that. The next natural step is the Permissionless-000 standard, to really have full dApps which are verifiable, running/simulating on the user’s device, fully on-chain, always on, always accessible.