
Wife of Rodney Howard-Browne. Child of God. Mother. Grandmother. Minister. God's Will: Nothing more-Nothing Less-Nothing Else! #JesusisLordOvertheUSA
Joined June 2010
- Tweets28.4K
- Following1.6K
- Followers14.5K
- Likes48
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
To my friends on the left.
You're about to be sold the most elegant trap in modern history. It will come wrapped in everything you care about: the planet, workers, justice, the climate. If you buy it, it will deliver the exact opposite of everything you've ever fought for.
Let me show you where it comes from.
In 1944, two philosophers of the Frankfurt School, Horkheimer and Adorno, wrote that reason and technology, the tools that were supposed to free humanity, had turned into tools of domination. Twenty years later, Marcuse argued that modern technology was the most sophisticated system of social control ever built. Brilliant men, with a real insight. But the lesson a whole generation of intellectuals took from them was simple: progress is suspect, and the machine is the enemy.
In 1968, the Club of Rome was founded. It was a small circle of industrialists, diplomats and scientists. Notice who was in the room. No workers, no farmers, no one from the slums. In 1972 they published The Limits to Growth. The message was that if humanity keeps growing, it collapses. So slow down, consume less, have fewer children, accept less.
Around the same time, Paul Ehrlich's The Population Bomb predicted that hundreds of millions would starve to death in the 1970s.
Here's what actually happened. The Green Revolution fed billions. The mass famines never came. In 1980 the economist Julian Simon bet Ehrlich that resources would get cheaper, not scarcer, and he won. Extreme poverty went from more than a third of humanity in 1990 to under one in ten. That didn't come from degrowth. It came from growth, energy and technology.
The pessimists were wrong about almost everything. But they won something more important than the argument. They won the institutions: UN agencies, NGOs, university departments, think tanks, Brussels. Nobody needed to coordinate. The ideas simply became the water everyone swims in. Growth is guilt. Technology is danger. The answer is always less.
Less for you, that is. Never for the people at Davos who fly private to discuss your carbon footprint.
Now watch what happens with AI. They'll connect it to the planet. Data centers drink water, burn gas and raise your electricity bill. Some of that is locally true, and the people living next to those sites deserve to be heard. Last March, Bernie Sanders and AOC proposed a national moratorium on new AI data centers, backed by hundreds of organizations.
So ask the oldest question on the left: who benefits?
A moratorium on new data centers freezes the ones that already exist. Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta already built theirs. A moratorium doesn't stop Big Tech. It crowns Big Tech. The startups, the public universities, the open-source labs, the countries of the Global South that were about to build their own are the ones who never get to. It's the greatest gift ever offered to an oligarchy, wrapped in green paper.
And here is what nobody tells you. AI isn't the planet's problem. It's the fastest path we have to solving the planet's problems.
AI is already controlling the plasma inside experimental fusion reactors. It has predicted the structure of nearly every known protein, which opens the door to enzymes that eat plastic and crops that need less water and less fertilizer. It has proposed hundreds of thousands of new stable materials for better batteries and cheaper solar. It forecasts weather and balances electric grids so renewables can actually work at scale.
Every problem you care about is, at its core, an intelligence problem. Clean energy, food, water, disease, poverty. Make intelligence abundant and those problems become solvable. Make it scarce and the solutions belong to whoever owns it.
That's the real trap. Fear of AI won't make AI disappear. It will only decide who owns it.
A world where intelligence is rationed creates a new aristocracy. On one side, a small class with unlimited cognitive labor at its command. On the other, everyone else, dependent on that class for their health, their education, their job, their permission to speak. No chains. Just dependency. That's how every modern form of servitude has worked, and the left used to understand that better than anyone.
Everything the left has ever wanted has never been closer: the end of poverty, healthcare and education for every human being, workers freed from exhausting labor, a planet that can breathe. Marx dreamed of a society where you could hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon and criticize after dinner. That isn't a world of scarcity. It's a world of abundance. Abundance is the only thing that has ever freed anyone.
So stay on the left if you want. Keep fighting for the poor, for workers, for the planet. Just fight with the most powerful tool humanity has ever been handed, not against it.
Because the people asking you to give it up already have theirs.
In the next ten years, humanity will make one choice that decides the next thousand.
Option A: an Orwellian world run by a tiny hyperclass that controls AI, owns every resource, and turns the rest of us into permanent dependents.
Option B: for the first time in history, a world where the systemic corruption that has ruled us for decades simply stops being possible.
Yesterday I wrote that Milei and Bukele exposed the empire of lies. Javier Milei reposted it. Today I want to explain why that post was only the beginning, and why I've never been more optimistic.
If you're on the left, or even the far left, read this one to the end. I'm not trying to convert you. The stakes are your future too.
Start from first principles. A system produces exactly what it rewards.
For decades, the Western system has been captured by one worldview: administrations, universities, NGOs, media, international institutions. The left didn't win the argument. It won the hiring committees.
Once a system is captured, its incentives flip.
You don't get promoted for solving problems. You get promoted for managing them. A solved problem kills a budget line. A managed problem renews it every year.
You don't succeed by telling the truth. You succeed by saying the right words. So hypocrisy becomes a career skill. The professor who preaches equality and runs the most closed network in the country. The politician who votes for open borders and lives where none of it ever reaches him.
You don't build fair systems. You build systems that look fair and quietly pay the people who run them. Inflation is a tax on the poor that funds the state. Programs fund the consultants who design more programs.
That's what "systemic" means. Nobody has to be evil. Honest people inside the machine either adapt or leave. After forty years, the ones still there are the ones who adapted.
Here's the irony. The first countries to break free were the ones at the very bottom.
Argentina was bankrupt. El Salvador was a graveyard. The system had nothing left to promise them, and that's exactly why they woke up. When the lie stops paying, people stop believing it.
No civilization is dead as long as its people can still see the problem clearly. Rock bottom is often where the rebound starts.
Now the West is caught in a vise.
On one side, AI. A technology that exposes managed incompetence. When a model can read a 2,000-page law, audit a national budget and compare outcomes across 50 countries in seconds, "it's complicated" stops working. The expert class loses its monopoly on knowledge.
On the other side, a generation of tech builders who think from first principles and don't owe their careers to the system. They have more capital, more talent and more reach than most countries. And they've seen up close how the machine works.
Put the two together and the old system is close to checkmate. It can't compete on results. It can't hide behind complexity. It can't control the narrative anymore.
So what does a system do when it can't win? It tries to own the thing that's beating it.
Listen to Marc Andreessen. He has said publicly that in 2024 he sat with Biden administration officials who told him AI would be two or three big companies working hand in hand with the government, that investors shouldn't even bother funding AI startups, and that parts of the underlying math could be classified the way nuclear physics was in the Cold War. He walked out and endorsed Trump. Former Biden officials now say that's not what was said. Read both versions and decide who you believe.
The logic doesn't depend on one lunch, though. Control three companies and you control the models. Control the models and you control what billions of people read, ask, learn and are allowed to say. Add a digital ID, a programmable currency and the scanning of private messages that Europe keeps putting back on the table. Then you don't need a Ministry of Truth anymore. A compliance department is enough.
1984 with a better UX.
And last Tuesday, Democrats took back Congress. This isn't theoretical anymore. The keys to the house are on the table.
Now imagine we don't hand them over.
Intelligence becomes almost free. Expertise stops being a privilege. A kid in a village in Brittany or a suburb of Lagos gets the same doctor, the same lawyer, the same tutor as a billionaire's son. The cost of producing almost everything collapses. And systemic corruption becomes nearly impossible, because anyone can audit every budget, every law and every promise, instantly.
For the first time in human history, a society that could be truly equal. The old left version was equality by sharing scarcity. This one is equality through abundance. A world where poverty stops being a law of nature.
Which is exactly what the left always said it wanted.
So to my friends on the left, one honest question. Which side actually leads there? The side that wants AI open, cheap and in everyone's hands? Or the side that wants it locked inside three companies and a regulator?
Milei and Bukele proved the impossible was possible at the scale of a country. AI is offering the same thing at the scale of civilization.
All we have to do is not give the keys to the people who were paid to keep the problem alive.
That's the choice. And I've never been more optimistic, because for the first time, we can all see it.
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
Important post for anyone interested in the truth. People have been deceived, especially young people. Their strength is that they care about the welfare of others - but these people take your strengths & they use them against you.
To my friends on the left.
You're about to be sold the most elegant trap in modern history. It will come wrapped in everything you care about: the planet, workers, justice, the climate. If you buy it, it will deliver the exact opposite of everything you've ever fought for.
Let me show you where it comes from.
In 1944, two philosophers of the Frankfurt School, Horkheimer and Adorno, wrote that reason and technology, the tools that were supposed to free humanity, had turned into tools of domination. Twenty years later, Marcuse argued that modern technology was the most sophisticated system of social control ever built. Brilliant men, with a real insight. But the lesson a whole generation of intellectuals took from them was simple: progress is suspect, and the machine is the enemy.
In 1968, the Club of Rome was founded. It was a small circle of industrialists, diplomats and scientists. Notice who was in the room. No workers, no farmers, no one from the slums. In 1972 they published The Limits to Growth. The message was that if humanity keeps growing, it collapses. So slow down, consume less, have fewer children, accept less.
Around the same time, Paul Ehrlich's The Population Bomb predicted that hundreds of millions would starve to death in the 1970s.
Here's what actually happened. The Green Revolution fed billions. The mass famines never came. In 1980 the economist Julian Simon bet Ehrlich that resources would get cheaper, not scarcer, and he won. Extreme poverty went from more than a third of humanity in 1990 to under one in ten. That didn't come from degrowth. It came from growth, energy and technology.
The pessimists were wrong about almost everything. But they won something more important than the argument. They won the institutions: UN agencies, NGOs, university departments, think tanks, Brussels. Nobody needed to coordinate. The ideas simply became the water everyone swims in. Growth is guilt. Technology is danger. The answer is always less.
Less for you, that is. Never for the people at Davos who fly private to discuss your carbon footprint.
Now watch what happens with AI. They'll connect it to the planet. Data centers drink water, burn gas and raise your electricity bill. Some of that is locally true, and the people living next to those sites deserve to be heard. Last March, Bernie Sanders and AOC proposed a national moratorium on new AI data centers, backed by hundreds of organizations.
So ask the oldest question on the left: who benefits?
A moratorium on new data centers freezes the ones that already exist. Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta already built theirs. A moratorium doesn't stop Big Tech. It crowns Big Tech. The startups, the public universities, the open-source labs, the countries of the Global South that were about to build their own are the ones who never get to. It's the greatest gift ever offered to an oligarchy, wrapped in green paper.
And here is what nobody tells you. AI isn't the planet's problem. It's the fastest path we have to solving the planet's problems.
AI is already controlling the plasma inside experimental fusion reactors. It has predicted the structure of nearly every known protein, which opens the door to enzymes that eat plastic and crops that need less water and less fertilizer. It has proposed hundreds of thousands of new stable materials for better batteries and cheaper solar. It forecasts weather and balances electric grids so renewables can actually work at scale.
Every problem you care about is, at its core, an intelligence problem. Clean energy, food, water, disease, poverty. Make intelligence abundant and those problems become solvable. Make it scarce and the solutions belong to whoever owns it.
That's the real trap. Fear of AI won't make AI disappear. It will only decide who owns it.
A world where intelligence is rationed creates a new aristocracy. On one side, a small class with unlimited cognitive labor at its command. On the other, everyone else, dependent on that class for their health, their education, their job, their permission to speak. No chains. Just dependency. That's how every modern form of servitude has worked, and the left used to understand that better than anyone.
Everything the left has ever wanted has never been closer: the end of poverty, healthcare and education for every human being, workers freed from exhausting labor, a planet that can breathe. Marx dreamed of a society where you could hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon and criticize after dinner. That isn't a world of scarcity. It's a world of abundance. Abundance is the only thing that has ever freed anyone.
So stay on the left if you want. Keep fighting for the poor, for workers, for the planet. Just fight with the most powerful tool humanity has ever been handed, not against it.
Because the people asking you to give it up already have theirs.
Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Contain Mycotoxins Linked to Liver and Kidney Damage
childrenshealthdefense.org/d…
'Compelling evidence' shows testimony of Jesus rising from the dead is 'true, study finds
mol.im/a/16279371
They held her down and aborted her baby, and her life was forever changed
liveaction.org/news/they-hel…
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
Pfizer paid John Legend. The WHO paid Lady Gaga. I read the report so you don't have to — and the numbers are worse than the headlines told you. Full episode — link in the first reply.
‼️CONQUERED - ISLAMIZATION OF COLORADO IS OFFICIALLY LOCKED IN
Governor-elect Phil Weiser just ran straight to the group that helped deliver him the election. Colorado Muslim Vote hosted a “meaningful dialogue” with the new governor-elect, gathering Muslim leaders and organizations representing more than 50,000 Coloradans.
The roster is long, deliberate, and dangerous:
Colorado Muslim Society, Muslim Youth for Positive Impact, Hasan Family Foundation, Crescent View Academy, Islamic Center of Fort Collins, Colorado Sudanese Community, Islamic Center of Aurora, Highlands Ranch Islamic Association, South East Aurora Islamic Center, Masjid Khadeejah, Masjid Noor, Islamic Center of Castle Rock, Colorado Muslim Community Center, US Palestinian Action Network, Colorado Palestinian Coalition, Broomfield Mosque, Boulder Mosque, South Denver Islamic Society, Masjid Shuhadah, Masjid Salam, Masjid Ikhlas, African Leadership Group, Colorado Indonesian Muslim Community, Pakistani American community of Colorado.
They organized. They showed up. They extracted the meeting. Weiser is already signaling he knows exactly who helped put him in office.
Meanwhile, Christian and Jewish communities that dwarf them in raw numbers continue to sit on the sidelines.
Mosques and Islamic centers keep multiplying across Denver, Colorado Springs, Aurora, Fort Collins, Castle Rock, and Highlands Ranch.
Bloc voting on Islamophobia, open borders, and Palestine/Hamas First, attacking law enforcement agencies, hating America and turning her Islamic is now a proven path to access.
If you’re still waiting for someone else to “stop the Islamization,” stop and GET INVOLVED! .
Churches can register as polling stations tomorrow.
Congregations can treat elections like the high-stakes contests they already are.
A community that turns out in the 90th percentile will keep outmaneuvering one that treats voting as optional.
Colorado just demonstrated the model. Organized, high-turnout Muslims set the terms. Everyone else can either match the engagement or keep posting about it after the fact.
We BETTER start getting engaed - we are watching our takeover in real time
ISLAMIZATION OF COLORADO!
The Democrat Leading Colorado’s Governor Race Is Already Auditioning for the Muslim Bloc
Many Coloradans still don’t grasp the scale of the Islamic expansion happening right now across the state.
Mosques and Islamic centers are popping up from Denver and Colorado Springs to Castle Rock, Highlands Ranch, Aurora, Fort Collins, and beyond. New communities are being deliberately organized for political influence in key districts.
The frontrunner in the Colorado governor’s race, Phil Weiser, didn’t wait to be courted — he ran to the Islamic community early to pander and secure the bloc.
Listen to him at the Colorado Muslim Vote forum:
Colorado Muslims’ bloc votes are actively vetting the next governor on three priorities: Islamophobia, Immigration/ICE, and Israel/BDS.
Nearly 100 questions were submitted. Weiser called it “phenomenal.”
From Tarek of the Islamic Center of Fort Collins:
“As governor, what specific steps would you take to combat Islamophobia?”
Weiser’s response: Standing against “rising hate” is personal and core to why he wants to be governor. “All of us need all of us… hate against any of us must be treated as hate against all of us.”
Then the BDS question: Colorado passed an anti-BDS law in 2016. Keep it or repeal it?
Weiser: We shouldn’t start picking and choosing nations for BDS. “Why would we start with Israel? Why not China…?” He frames it as Colorado staying out of foreign policy.
This is not abstract. While mosques multiply and sermons push jihad, Sharia, and hostility to “infidels,” the leading candidate is auditioning for the bloc on their terms.
Colorado is changing faster than most people realize. Pay attention before it’s locked in.
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
It’s time for Americans to unite
Black attorney in Detroit drove into a neighborhood, was immediately surrounded by 30 Arabs and robbed, they took her purse and robbed her. They yelled racial slurs. More came, 80 Arabs had her surrounded
An Arab hit her car with his car and then the crowd of Arabs removed the license plate and pushed the vehicle away so the coming police wouldn’t find the evidence
They then surrounded the black attorney and were racist and threatening towards her
For those who don’t know there is an extremely extensive racist history of Muslims to Blacks. Muslims throughout history and even today an Islamic countries don’t like blacks, they take them as slaves and in their society they are seen as “diseased” and extremely undesirable
This is real, and is happening today in Arab countries. Not all Arab think like this but an overwhelming amount do, especially in Islamic countries
Michigan imported Muslims and this is the result
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Sayed Mohassib, 27, a former NYPD officer and current elementary school teacher’s aide at PS 200 in Brooklyn, has been charged with second-degree murder in the Oct. 30 fatal stabbing of jogger Katie Suarez, 28, on the Shore Parkway Greenway.
Despite a documented history of psychiatric issues including a Marines discharge on psychological grounds, prior hospitalizations, and a paranoia claim that people were going to come and kill his family, he was still working with children at the time of the attack.
He allegedly returned home afterward, discarded bloody clothing down a garbage chute, then continued showing up for work with kids until his arrest.
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
🚨INCREDIBLE: A Black immigrant woman was asked what kind of Black woman votes for MAGA. Her answer shut it down!
She replied: “I am the kind of black woman who is educated. I have done several research on American history, I actually love American history. I’m also well traveled, having been to 5 out of the 7 continents. I love the Lord and my family and I love America. I am an immigrant and I care about what the future holds for my children and my grandchildren who have yet to be born. What I do today will affect them tomorrow. So, what kind of black woman am I to vote for MAGA? The kind that wants to Make America Great Again!”
Her response cuts through the assumption that race dictates politics. She listed education, travel, faith, family, and love of country as her reasons, not party loyalty or peer pressure.
Voters make choices based on what they believe will protect their children and the future of the nation. This woman made that clear.
Congenital Measles Wasn’t a Problem When Everyone Got Measles as a Kid — Vaccines Changed That
childrenshealthdefense.org/d…
96
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
Governor Huckabee Sanders tells an incredible emotional story about a secret trip into middle east war zone she accompanied President Trump on Christmas day. You can hear a pin drop in the room as she speaks and her voice quivers from emotion.
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
Let me repeat this critical point: After a very public federal lawsuit demanding that the CDC identify the studies it claims support that the vaccines on its schedule given in the first six months of life do not cause autism...
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
🚨HOLY SHT: Independent journalist provides real news in Mexico. Give him a follow. Stay safe Dan.
The Situation Is Bad In Mexico Right Now…Pray For Mexico
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
THESE people do not come in peace.
America is next on their list.
Islam is completely incompatible with Western Civilization…
They must be repatriated to their own broken countries.
Adonica Howard-Browne retweeted
Recently I told you there are two kinds of people in this system: cynics and believers.
Ursula von der Leyen, I put her with the believers. And that's exactly why you need to understand how the machine works.
Because cynics are very rare. Soros, I put him in that category: he knows exactly what he's doing, and he has never hidden it.
He read Popper, he has a theory of change, and he understood early on something the right still hasn't figured out: you don't change a society by winning an election. You change it by funding, for thirty years, the people who will write the reports, train the lawyers, and advise whoever wins the elections.
$24 billion spent by Open Society since its creation. More than 50,000 grants. In 2015, he wrote in plain text that the EU must accept at least a million asylum seekers a year, and mobilize NGOs, churches and businesses to take them in.
All of it is public. That's the most impressive part.
Here's how the system got hacked, in three steps.
Step one: selection.
Nobody recruits idiots. No need. The money does the selecting on its own.
A grant never goes to the person who doubts. It goes to the person who already believes. Repeat that over thirty years and tens of thousands of grants, and you get an entire ecosystem where the free thinker was filtered out at the door. He wasn't fired. He just never got funded.
What's left: people who are sincere, credentialed, conformist, and whose paycheck depends on the cause.
Step two: funding manufactures conviction.
Try explaining something to someone whose paycheck depends on not getting it.
The NGO produces a report. The report gets cited by an expert. The expert testifies before the Commission. The Commission turns it into a directive. And the NGO guy ends up in a cabinet, then goes back to a foundation.
Everyone knows each other, cites each other, funds each other. It's an echo chamber with a budget.
Step three: emotion.
You never debate results. You debate intentions.
One photo beats a thousand statistics. Every objection backed by numbers becomes a moral failing. And when reality contradicts the narrative, the dissonance always gets resolved the same way:
"It's a necessary evil."
"It's collateral damage."
"The real problem is elsewhere."
Immigration is never a problem. The problem is your perception.
The result: the system doesn't produce corrupt people. It produces NPCs. People reciting a script while convinced they wrote it themselves.
Ursula doesn't need to be bought. She has spent her entire career in an environment where every expert, every report, every "civil society" group tells her the same thing. She is convinced she's on the side of good. And that's what makes her immune to facts.
And the best part of the story: Soros isn't even the system's biggest funder anymore.
You are.
Between 2021 and 2023, €7.4 billion in EU funds went to more than 12,000 NGOs. The European Court of Auditors itself says it can't get a reliable picture of who gets what.
The hack worked so well that the machine now runs on your taxes.
This is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy hides. Here, the amounts are public, the op-eds are public, the recipients are public.
It's an incentive system. And you don't fight an incentive system by insulting the believers. You fight it by cutting off the tap and demanding total transparency: who funds whom, to say what.
As long as it stays opaque, they'll keep shipping believers at scale.





















