as opposed to this earlier attempt to protect the community from persons more likely than not to commit serious acts of violence, if those persons happen to be Gregory Wayne Kable not constitutional; would be more constitutional if they didn't involve a judge

in Australia we've come to a happy medium, we pass laws so that specific people who are already locked up can't get parole, and the courts have decided this is constitutional

It's full of this kind of thing. Barrier seems to be that 1949 specified uniform road rules in broad strokes, while 1968 specifies much greater detail. "Victoria requires an exemption from this section due to trams, ACT and NT query the application of this provision..."

I'm down a rabbit hole

(all from JSCEM 2025 election inquiry interim report)

RETVRN

a beautiful clean instruction set, with an official architecture specification that in not-very-IBM fashion dedicates an entire page to Jonathan Swift

a more important thing that @highcourtofaus could do is fix their DMARC settings, which do not indicate to email providers that emails claiming to be from hcourt.gov.au that don't pass validation are to be sent to spam (p=quarantine) or outright refused (p=reject)