americashawk dittohead

Hakeem Jeffries says Democrats will start with a stock ban. Beautiful. On September 30, all 47 Senate Democrats voted to block one. In July, 198 House Democrats did the same. Ro Khanna, the top Nvidia trader in Congress, was one of them. His trusts sold in September. Nvidia's CEO resigned in November. Proof? No. Here is the record, and here is what is only alleged. I'll label which is which. THE RECORD. The House passed the Stop Insider Trading Act 232 to 198 on July 22. Thirteen Democrats voted yes. On September 30 the Senate tried to advance it and fell short, 53 to 47. Every Democrat voted no. The reasons given: voter ID got attached, members keep the stock they already own, and the president is left out. Chip Roy wants the executive branch covered too, and President Trump has said he would sign a ban. So, @RepJeffries, a Democratic stock ban is a buffering wheel that never finishes. Khanna's annual disclosure lists 5,402 trades in 2025, on 244 of the 252 days the market was open. Those trusts took eight days off. Filings I can confirm show two Nvidia sales, September 4 and September 23, each $1,001 to $15,000. Small. His 2024 disclosure puts the family's holdings as high as about $315 million, so small is the word. Nvidia's board opened its investigation November 8, more than six weeks after the second sale. Khanna told NOTUS the money sits in his wife's family's diversified trust and is "not something I control." That is diversified the way a hot dog is a balanced meal. Anyone who calls it diversified is a dalcop, which is an old word for a fool, look it up. Two videos claim a sale the day after Nvidia's peak. I can't find that filing, so it stays out. Show me and it goes in. They also claim a 46 percent drop. Nasdaq closes put it near 29 percent under the October high on November 10. THE ALLEGATION. In May, researcher Kevin Bass posted a 239-page complaint against Khanna. Claims, not findings: 37,238 trades across 114 House reports, nearly all in the names of Khanna's wife and child. 624 filed late. About $61 million in profit at his middle estimate, roughly $28 million more than an index fund. Bass says the disclosure forms show no blind trust and no outside manager. Khanna says the trust is independent. I found no sign any investigation has opened. Bass's own numbers put Khanna's late-filing rate at 1.74 percent, against a House average near 10. So I'm not leaning on the late filings. Quinn's Ninth Law says liberals judge by intentions, not outcomes. A press conference is an intention. 53 to 47 is an outcome. Quinn's Seventh Law says it is different when you are a Democrat. If a Republican's spouse sold Nvidia weeks before a CEO scandal, that is cable news by lunch. And a ban that leaves out the White House is about as useful as a solar-powered night light, so write the real one. The same disclosure pages list Fetterman, Blumenthal, Susie Lee and a long run of Republicans. Names and handles are in the replies. You do not need a press conference. You need noon on January 3. That is 50 days. Write a clean bill, put the president in it, make people sell what they hold, leave the voter ID off, and bring it to the floor. No rush, though. One question while you draft: name the Democratic senator who voted YES on September 30. I'll wait. What's next, the caucus that blocked a stock ban in the Senate announces one as its first act... wait. I'm being told that's his post. Keep talking, @RoKhanna. I'm collecting material for the outhouse wall. But what do I know, I'm only a retired combat medic who checks the filing date before the headline.