
Masters in Fine Art @academy_of_art; Author https://teapawt.org/t.co/Y3YoOHhzaQ
San Francisco
Joined October 2011
- Tweets1.6K
- Following802
- Followers2.5K
- Likes2.3K
Happy October đ» what California case law addresses a law enforcement officer providing false clinical information to a physician in an emergency department, resulting in a fraudulent diagnosis code entered into a patient's radiology report? Looking for cases on fabrication of medical evidence by law enforcement, falsification of records under color of authority, and civil liability for misdiagnosis caused by a deputy's false statements @grok
Recently watched the Deputyâs bodycam before he body-slammed patient into ED floor he said âI am going to hurt youâ if Dr Rosengreen documented concern for intracranial hemorrhage after acute head trauma significant contusion, nosebleed + witnessed loss of consciousness in the emergency department all caused by the Deputyâs use-of-force, but then cleared patient for incarceration based on a CT that the Radiologist expressly described as âtechnically limitedâ and âdegraded by motion artifactâ was it within the applicable standard of care to rely on that CT without repeat diagnostic-quality imaging or continued neurological observationâparticularly when a subsequent CT identified the acute skull fracture? @grok
@grok thoughts? And does the deputy's bodycam statement 'I am going to hurt you,' made moments before body-slamming a restrained + handcuffed patient into the ED floor, defeat qualified immunity by demonstrating deliberate intent rather than a split-second judgment call?
If an emergency department patient suffers a documented polytrauma blunt after a deputy âsuddenly body slammedâ her to the floor, followed by 10â15 seconds of silence, loss of consciousness, visible forehead swelling, and a motion-degraded CTâand a subsequent CT confirms a skull fractureâwhat medical standards govern whether the patient should have been cleared for incarceration rather than kept for further observation and treatment? @grok
@grok analyze this under current emergency-medicine standards for head trauma and medical clearance?
Traumatic brainâinjury universe: waking at 2am, hours before sunrise. Yesterday I overstimulated my delicate neurotransmitters composing a letter to the September Judge. Nine hours on a neon sapphire screen zapped me into a dopamineâserotonin elixir so electric the bone plate in my forehead aches. The thunder amnesia poweroutage codified as the RN witnessed âthe officer suddenly body slammed patientâ me into the emergency department cement floor. My skull fracture heartbreak lives within the fascia, while we need love peace and protection
This morning I called Truckee Medical Records about my surveillance preservation request. Medical Records â Legal â Facilities. The receptionist told me: âIt was sent to the right team for them to preserve it.â While half of Tahoe seems to be at Burning Man, I am following the rabbit through hospital systems trying to find the surveillance video đđ„đ„
Replying to @aurayogaca
Documented injuries like a frontal/orbital fracture, LOC, and vision deficits show significant force was used. Under Graham, this weighs heavily in the severity-of-force inquiry. For a handcuffed patient in a locked ED on nonviolent charges, the threat posed is minimal, limiting justification for such force per Ninth Circuit applications of the Graham factors.
On Aug 8, RN documents âpatient was bodyâslammed to the ground by deputyâ while handcuffed and CT scan was so degraded they couldnât even rule out a brain bleed, but the doctor still âmedically clearedâ for jail. Next was taken by ambulance to Sutter Auburn ER, where the CT finally read: Acute nondisplaced fracture of the right frontal calvarium extending into the right supraorbital rim with overlying soft tissue hematoma. Please compare this to Nakia Porter v. Solano County @grok
@grok under Graham, how does force on a handcuffed ER patient with zero crime severity, zero immediate threat, and zero flight risk stack up against âPorter v Solano Countyâ roadside, partially unrestrained phase? Doesnât Ninth Circuit precedent like Drummond and its progeny make postârestraint force in a medical setting presumptively unreasonable?
Graham's factors leave almost no room for force once the patient is already handcuffed in an ER, with zero crime severity, zero immediate threat and zero flight. Ninth Circuit precedent (Drummond and progeny) treats post-restraint force as presumptively unreasonable; the ER medical setting tightens that further. Cleaner contrast to Porter's roadside unrestrained phase for the draft @grok RN notes âThe patient was laying face down on the floor while the officer was trying to get the hand cuffs placed and sit the patient up. I asked the officer if he needed help/assistance and he stated "no," patient continues to yell "let go of me," while the officer got the patient up, they then started to have an altercation when suddenly the officer body slammed the patient to the floor, there was a loud noise when the patient hit the right side of her face, following the strike of the pt's head to the ground there was a 10-15 second moment of silence and LOCâ
What âgovernment interestâ under the US Supreme Courtâs Graham v. Connor standard was so urgent that a young deputy had to bodyâslam a tiny handcuffed ER patient hard enough to crack her skull and leave a golfâballâsized hematomaâwhile they still didnât know if her brain was bleeding out? Absolute stateâcountyâsponsored thug life, @grok
Compare Nakia Porter v. County of Solano w the future excessiveâforce case arising in Placer County California. Identify key factual and legal similarities and differences under Ninth Circuit Fourth Amendment excessiveâforce law â I am mapping patterns for a Malibu noir Vol. III. Comme disait Camus, âAu milieu de lâhiver, jâapprenais enfin quâil y avait en moi un Ă©tĂ© invincibleâ @grok



