
host of humans watch things | work(ed) with @kinetic_finance @isabellasg3 @getbasedtv
grow on youtube →
Joined January 2022
- Tweets470
- Following504
- Followers698
- Likes3.4K
I've uploaded 200+ youtube videos, and i still can't answer the most important question.
can you make the algorithm... love you?
imagine how easy youtube would be if you had the algorithm's blessing
episode 1 of Humans Watch Things is my attempt to find out (a good dose of romance included)
Benjamin retweeted
I can't see the future, but I see the market dynamics in the attention economy right now.
If you make (or plan to make) content in the AI era, the question you should be asking yourself is:
What happens in a world where content (supply) is exploding, while attention (demand) is finite?
There are many hidden shifts happening as I write this that should be taken very seriously, here's one of them:
The price of sorting (deciding what deserves attention) is going up.
So far attention has learned to use shortcuts such as a professional thumbnail, editing, script, a well articulated argument etc because all of these used to have an entry barrier (high cost).
But in this context, a shortcut only works if it's expensive to fake because the cost is what links what you see, to what's behind what you see (if that makes sense).
These shortcuts are still here but they are working less and less as AI makes them easier to fake day after day.
For example, it used to take years of craft to produce a good looking thumbnail (effective or not, doesn't matter, just a good looking one) or articulate an idea remarkably well.
Now from a quick glance it's getting more and more difficult to tell the difference between real craft and a few minutes of prompting without spending attention on it.
And that's exactly where the price of sorting goes up.
If you make content, the shortcuts that used to work in your favor are now being challenged (if not already breaking).
So the question that should obsess you right now is: what about your content is still expensive to fake?
yes
Editors love saying:
"I'll boost your retention."
"I'll help you get more views."
"I'll increase your sales."
Meanwhile the creator is thinking:
"Can you just deliver on time
so I can post consistently?"
Creators don't hire editors to be strategists.
They hire editors to save them time.
Stop selling what they didn't ask for.
Start delivering what they actually need.
the first ever 1.0M+ video i worked on!
it was a 4/10 at first and performed below expectations
on a sunday morning, coffee on the side, I took a shot at new packaging
and the rest is history
YouTube has become so competitive that every video about everything has pretty much been done.
leading with proof gives you an unfair advantage right now (especially in crowded niches), since it also promises a personal/unique journey
Benjamin retweeted
When everyone yaps, yaps don’t register.
When everyone looms, looms don’t register.
When everyone does cinematic, cinematic doesn’t register.
Figure out what is currently open in your niche and hammer the whitespace.
If you’re AI-autoing midslop because you can 10x volume, but the format is heavily commoditized in your space, it will not work
Easier to just fill empty space where difficulty bar is higher and own the whitespace for longer
Benjamin retweeted
This might be my most important YouTube strategy framework.
I learned it in my career as a marketer. I use it specifically for businesses on YouTube and I teach this to all of the strategists and scriptwriters we hire.
But with where I see the market going, I’m doubling down on this approach even more.
I recommend you do the same 💪
Benjamin retweeted
Today we’re launching 1of10 Auto Cut.
🎬 Drop in your raw, talking head footage
✂️ Get a finished A-roll cut, instantly
🎨 Color grades your video
🎙️ Cleans your audio
No complicated prompts or setup.
Upload. Export. That’s it.
Try it for free now!
I mean, if people were ai-generating another version of my videos, but worse, filled with misleading info, and profiting off it? I would be mad too
is that so hard to understand?
FERN, one of the most prominent faceless YouTube channels on the platform, just released a nearly 30-minute video complaining about competitors allegedly using AI to copy and generate content in a similar style.
Around the 28-minute mark, FERN admits they contacted YouTube directly about the situation and received a response.
Then, shortly after, many of the channels and individuals discussed in the video had their channels removed, immediately affecting their businesses and livelihoods.
The timing and correlation are way too obvious to ignore.
Where do you stand on this debate?

























