pm/designer. currently @airbnb. previously @spotify.

Boston
Joined October 2008
Bryan Roy retweeted
Just gonna leave this here while we wait for tomorrow.
25
164
5
3,227
93,016
Even simpler: 1. 0→1 builder who finds product-market fit 2. 1→100x grower who ships adjacent use cases 3. Loop designer who scales quality and craft
As engineering, product, design, DS, etc. melt into a new kind of role, I was reflecting on what roles might look like in the future. For example, when I look at the Claude Code team I see what I think is five archetypes: 1. Prototyper: comes up with brand new ideas; churns out many ideas, most of which don't ship 2. Builder: quickly turns a prototype/idea into production-grade product/infra 3. Sweeper: cleans up the UI, simplifies the code and system, unships, optimizes performance 4. Grower: takes a product that has been built and iterates on it to improve Product-Market Fit 5. Maintainer: owns a mature system to make it secure, reliable, fast, and efficient as it scales Many people span across 2 roles, and sometimes 3 roles. I also notice that these roles are not really tied to job function -- eg. across Anthropic, some designers match category 1, some 2, some 3; same for engineers, PM, DS. A healthy team needs a mix of these, depending on the product: - A product that is new and pre-PMF needs people that are strong at 1+2+3 - A product that is growing and has found PMF needs 2+3+4 and some 5 - A product that has strong PMF needs 3+4+5 and some 2 Maybe product roles of the future will look more like this, and less like the domain-specific roles of today?
4
128
Bryan Roy retweeted
Vibe coding is the new product management. Training and tuning models is the new coding.
992
2,065
342
20,596
1,255,888
Inspo board 🤔
Brand exploration for OpenAI with Sam Altman, February 2023 Two logo concepts – Circle and Monogram – alongside broader exploration for ChatGPT across brand and product. More details and link below.
3
388
Product managers and designers I love working with: - Creative - Decisive - Storytellers - Open minded - Think like marketers - Obsessed with users - Pushes team on craft - Doesn’t defer to metrics - Never hides behind process - Crystal clear on the problem
1
86
Spotify made personalized playlists for every user so that you didn’t need to curate music. Someone needs to make personalized context for every user so that you don’t need to prompt chats.
“If AI had existed ten years ago, products would not look the way they do today. We need to move beyond chat and create experiences where AI feels native, invisible, and context-aware. This is our role: to imagine the future, and to bring it into the present.”
174
Every person in tech will feel how AI changes product management. For example: Pre-AI: Set up hours of back-to-back meetings to “align” with stakeholders Post-AI: Train your agents and models to simulate discussions and feedback in seconds
1
113
The <autofocus/> html attribute crawled so perplexity could run.
Replying to @gunnargray
2. Faster questions: removed the bottom navigation, allowing the app to launch with the keyboard open, making it faster to ask questions.
282
Spotify’s AI DJ began as a prototype with a generic voice that sounded like FM radio. We almost shipped that. It would’ve failed. The push for craft gave it the unique voice and personality of our coworker Xavier. Engineers built it. UX Writers made it matter. AI without great writing is just math.
1
92
Every product shipped at a big tech company is the sum of data + debates + decisions I’ve been testing “AI agents as coworkers” in @cursor_ai to simulate this Takeaways: 1. Product management is about to be reinvented 2. Chatting with AI still feels like the command line era
1
108
Now you can Airbnb more than an Airbnb
1,180
1,233
1,365
16,477
6,658,025
The more things change, the more they stay the same. 🏒 ❄️ 📍 Boston Public Garden 🗓️ 1930 - 2025
13
381
16
6,099
209,580
What a shot.
3
180
15
2,158
52,649
"0-to-1" creators/leaders at big tech co's know how/when to bring in the "1-to-10" teams.
Observed: The portability of products and people is an essential motion for innovation to thrive in a big company. But this tendency is somewhat counterintuitive for traditional managers that define their success by the number of people on their team. Perhaps the true “entrepreneurs” in big companies don’t hoard and build fiefdoms, they start and handoff - constantly “re-potting” anything that starts growing fast into the right part of the business with the right incentives so the roots go deep?
1
755
So proud of the work our personalization team does here.
Truly stellar quarter. Improving step by step. Thanks to all Spotify teams around the world.
2
536
Spotify DJ: The 200 Best Inventions of 2023 | TIME time.com/collection/best-inv…
3
180
If Spotify were starting today, it might not succeed. Why? Because of Apple's innovation barriers, says @eldsjal. Learn more: spoti.fi/46EIwzc
285
361
81
1,850
3,339,518
Empathy also expands the scope of what you design for: Both the perceptions and the realities of your users.
when it comes to nailing product-market fit, empathy > passion. too many builders are motivated by vision as opposed to understanding what their customers are actually struggling with (often nuanced, psychological, and surprising). passion is the red herring of product - often yielding results many degrees off.
1
174
Bryan Roy retweeted
Introducing Jam – a new way for you and your friends to share the queue and choose what’s playing together. spotify.link/jam
51
91
109
702
462,844