OpenAI's latest cyber-specialized model is out.
· Available through Daybreak Red access
· Claimed standout performance across many cyber use cases
사이버 특화 모델 공개. Daybreak Red로 접근 가능. teapawt.org/thsottiaux/status/2118…
CZ가 SignalPlus 이용자에게 연결한 모든 API 키 폐기를 촉구했어요.
· 다른 거래소에서 SignalPlus를 쓰는 경우도 대상
· API 키를 제3자 플랫폼에 보관하지 말라고 권고
· 데리비트도 앞서 이 내용을 알렸다고 언급 teapawt.org/cz_binance/status/2118…
ChatGPT Images 2.6에 GIF 생성과 참조 이미지 지원이 추가됐어요. 이제 움직이는 이미지까지 ChatGPT 안에서 만들 수 있네요. teapawt.org/OpenAI/status/21181249…
Tencent Hy4 scores 35 on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index v5.
· among China-based AI labs
· $0.834/$2.501 per 1M input/output tokens
텐센트 Hy4, 중국 AI 연구소 모델 중 2위. teapawt.org/ArtificialAnlys/status…
Hy4 from Tencent scores 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 and is the #2 model from a China-based AI lab
Hy4 is the latest model from @TencentHunyuan and is the successor to Hy3 released earlier this year. It scores 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, equal with Grok 4.7 (xhigh) and 1 point behind Claude Haiku 5.5 (max). Hy4 is the #2 model from a China-based AI lab, behind only Kimi K3.1 Pro, which scores 46. Hy4 is priced at $0.834/$2.501 per 1M input/output tokens.
Key takeaways:
➤ Hy4 excels at agentic coding tasks. Hy4 scores 31% on FrontierCode 2.0, compared to 32% for Claude Fable 5.1 (max). It is the leading model from a China-based AI lab, with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) scoring 28% and Kimi K3.1 Pro scoring 25%. On Terminal-Bench 4.0, it scores 37%, the fourth-highest score among models from China-based AI labs
➤ Hy4 outperforms its peers on knowledge and reasoning. Hy4 achieves accuracy of 50% on AA-Omniscience v1.1, 1 point ahead of Kimi K3.1 Pro, but has a high hallucination rate of 89% compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro’s 37%. On HLE-Diamond, it scores 33% compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro’s 37%
➤ Hy4 offers a competitive Capability vs. Cost trade-off compared to to peers. With a Cost per Intelligence Index Task of $0.78, Hy4 (35) is 10-times cheaper than Grok 4.7 (xhigh, 35) and 13-times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (34) but almost twice as expensive as Claude Haiku 5.5 (max, 36)
Other model details:
➤ Context window: 1 million tokens
➤ Pricing: $0.834/$2.501 per 1M input/output tokens. Cache reads $0.042 per 1M tokens
➤ Multimodality: Text and image input, with text output
A reporter says GPT-6.2 Astra and Sol appeared in Google Cloud Console.
· Listed on the quotas page
· Report posted Nov 4, 23:37 UTC
GPT-6.2 두 모델명이 구글 클라우드 할당량 페이지에 보였다는 제보. teapawt.org/testingcatalog/status/…
Sunburst's strength carries into editing.
· Text-to-image: #2, 1409 pts
· Image edit: #3, 1476 pts
생성과 편집 모두 상위권 teapawt.org/arena/status/211813906…
GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst and Flare by @OpenAI are here, running almost 2x faster than GPT Image 2.5.
In the Text-to-Image Arena, Sunburst (Medium) is #2 with 1409 pts, and Flare (Medium) #4 with 1384 pts! By category, Sunburst landed #1 in Cartoon, Anime & Fantasy.
In the Image Edit Arena, Sunburst (Medium) is #3 with 1476 pts, and Flare (Medium) #5 with 1462 pts. See leaderboard in thread.
With this release, @OpenAI remains the #1 lab in both arenas and holds all top 5 Text-to-Image spots!
GPT Image 2.6 lands on Arena with enhanced speed. According to @OpenAI, Sunburst (Medium) and Flare (Medium) are more than 2x faster than GPT Image 2.5 while maintaining the lead over competing labs. They report similar quality to Image 2.5, with enhanced photorealism, greater editing consistency, and a dynamic reasoning level that enables latency as low as 5 seconds. Find more details at their blog linked below.
Congrats to the @OpenAI team on this release!
Enterprise AI spend is bigger. Growth is faster too.
· $1.7B in 2023 to $176.8B in 2026
· 5.4x this year vs. 3.9x last year
기업 AI 지출은 규모가 커져도 성장 속도가 더 빨라짐 teapawt.org/MenloVentures/status/2…
$1.7B in 2023 ➡️ $176.8B in 2026.
Enterprise AI spend is up roughly 100x in three years, and growth is accelerating: 5.4x this year vs. 3.9x last year.
@timt on why buyers aren’t pulling back. Read Menlo's 2026 State of Enterprise AI report: mnlo.vc/enterprise-ai-26
3배 큰 미국 오픈웨이트 모델도 앞섰다는 코딩 모델 SWE-2 Flash. 코그니션 측 평가 기준이고, 가중치는 파트너·연구자에게 제한적으로 공유하는 프로그램을 준비 중이네요. teapawt.org/cognition/status/21180…
허이가 바이낸스 보안·접근 관리 비판을 수용하고, 이용자 자금 문제에 전적인 책임을 지겠다고 밝혔어요.
· 4일 오후 9시 6분 KST 게시
· 보안·접근 관리 관련 비판과 제안을 모두 수용
· 댓글을 하나씩 읽고 있다고 설명
· 문제가 있는 부분에서 책임을 회피하지 않겠다는 입장 teapawt.org/heyibinance/status/211…
Regarding criticism and suggestions about Binance’s security and access management, we accept them all. We have always believed that transparency builds trust. We read every comment one by one. Binance is not a perfect company, but a company that is constantly evolving. Criticism shows that people have expectations and standards for Binance, and these are sources of motivation for our growth.
Binance has never shirked responsibility where problems exist. At present, as a trading platform, Binance needs to address three issues:
1)Will users’ funds be affected? Binance will bear full responsibility,this is what we should do. Legally, if the funding gap is large, one could file for bankruptcy and run away, but Binance operates in a “user-centric” way, with contractual spirit and a sense of moral responsibility.
2)How did the problem occur? Before publication, many professionals advised that it would be best not to include details, but we believe transparency creates trust. If this report is of reference value to other peers regarding the complexity of social engineering and the warning about AI permission boundaries, then the report is meaningful.
3)How can it be prevented in the future? We have already restructured security boundaries across departmental access management, security environments, updated devices, reset AI tools, and in accordance with zero-trust and least-privilege principles. A security audit will subsequently issue a report.
Finally, we welcome more top AI security experts and technical talent to join Binance. You can DM me directly or apply on the Binance website for positions you are interested in. Joining Binance to verify this security system is the best way to validate it.
关于对币安的安全和权限管理的批评建议,我们都认。我们一直相信坦透明会建立信任,大家的评论都有一条一条看,币安不是完美的公司,但是一个一直在进化的公司,批评说明对币安有期望,对币安有标准,这些都是我们成长的动力源泉。
币安有问题的地方也从来没有推卸过责任。当下,币安作为交易平台需要解决三个问题:
1)用户的钱会不会受影响?币安会完全承担,这是我们应该做的。法律上资金缺口大可以申请破产跑路,但币安经营是“以用户中心”,是契约精神和大义。
2)问题是怎么发生的?发布前很多专业人士的意见是最好没有细节,但我们认为透明产生信任,如果这个报告在社会工程的复杂度,在AI权限边界的警示对其他同行有参考意义,那么这个报告就有意义。
3)以后如何杜绝?当前已经从各部门权限管理,安全环境,更新设备,重置AI工具,并遵循0信任、最小化原则重构安全边界,后续会由安全审计出具报告。
最后欢迎更多顶尖的AI安全专家和技术人才加入币安,您可以直接DM我本人,也可以在币安网站申请你感兴趣的岗位。加入币安来验证这套安全体系是最好的验证办法。
ChatGPT 웹 결제 설정에 'Family Basic'이라는 요금제 이름이 새로 보이네요. 가족 단위로 같이 쓰는 플랜을 준비하는 것 같은데, 오픈AI 공식 발표는 아직 없고 가격이나 인원 수도 안 나왔어요. 지금 개인 플랜은 전부 1인용이라 집에서 계정을 따로 결제하던 분들은 지켜볼 만하겠네요. teapawt.org/btibor91/status/211787…
CZ가 최근 24시간 순유입액을 28억 달러로 제시했어요.
· CZ가 공개 데이터를 근거로 직접 밝힌 수치
· 집계 기간은 최근 24시간, 금액은 달러 기준 순유입액
· 게시 시각은 11월 4일 오후 2시 12분, 한국시간 기준 teapawt.org/cz_binance/status/2117…
회사 플러그인마다 따로 로그인하던 수고가 줄겠네요. Claude Team·Enterprise 관리자가 설정해두면 팀원은 플러그인을 처음 쓸 때 자동으로 연결돼요. teapawt.org/bcherny/status/2117693…
CBLab retweeted
A hack of this scale means serious security failures occurred. No platform is unhackable, but that cannot be an excuse. Every incident exposes weaknesses that should have been prevented.
Some details are embarrassing. Public explanations also simplify what appears to have been a prolonged multi month/year attack targeting hundreds of employees and systems, with a few ultimately compromised.
Sharing those details, however uncomfortable, helps the wider industry learn.
As a shareholder, I expect Binance to be transparent about what went wrong, take responsibility, learn from all criticism, and make meaningful improvements. 🙏
Thanks @binance for sharing all these details. Incredibly helpful to the entire industry.
CZ가 바이낸스 해킹에 심각한 보안 실패가 있었다며 투명한 공개와 책임을 요구했어요.
· 해킹을 완벽히 막을 수 없다는 말은 변명이 될 수 없다고 지적
· 수개월~수년간 직원 수백 명과 시스템을 겨냥한 공격으로 보인다고 설명
· 주주로서 바이낸스에 비판 수용과 실질적 개선 요구 teapawt.org/cz_binance/status/2117…
A hack of this scale means serious security failures occurred. No platform is unhackable, but that cannot be an excuse. Every incident exposes weaknesses that should have been prevented.
Some details are embarrassing. Public explanations also simplify what appears to have been a prolonged multi month/year attack targeting hundreds of employees and systems, with a few ultimately compromised.
Sharing those details, however uncomfortable, helps the wider industry learn.
As a shareholder, I expect Binance to be transparent about what went wrong, take responsibility, learn from all criticism, and make meaningful improvements. 🙏
AI budgets missed the scale of demand.
· Planned spend: 1.9x last year’s AI budget
· Actual average: 4.7x
기업 AI 지출, 계획보다 훨씬 컸음 teapawt.org/MenloVentures/status/2…
The biggest story of the year? Agents.
Enterprises planned to spend 1.9x last year’s AI budget. On average, they spent 4.7x.
Agents change the economics of AI. They work in parallel and keep going after people step away, so spend scales with work, not headcount.
The same pattern shows up in usage. On @OpenRouter*, a platform that gives developers access to hundreds of AI models, agents now generate 80% of all tokens, about 7x human-driven usage. Agent traffic is up 37x since it overtook humans in February.
The center of AI usage has moved from a person with a question to a machine with a task.
More from our 2026 State of Enterprise AI report: mnlo.vc/enterprise-ai-26
*Menlo Ventures is an investor in OpenRouter.
CBLab retweeted
People should always be in control of the future.
OpenAI is against the notion that it would be acceptable for people to be relegated to a role of doing things that “AI systems think makes sense to reward in humans”.
People should not cede control of the future to superintelligence, and that requirement should ultimately constrain AI progress.































