Cineobserver (@cineobserver) header
Cineobserver (@cineobserver) profile picture

An independent journalist who has been a part of several media houses in various capacities.

Tamil Nadu, India
Joined June 2009
Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)Photo by Cineobserver (@cineobserver)
Case Today - An entrepreneur expresses his discomfort with a female employee for her toxic behaviour with team members She resigns from the company and joins a competitor. Founder of that company and this woman then start emailing all the clients of this entrepreneur talking rubbish about rates etc and he starts losing business Frustrated with the harrassment, he files a defamation case in High Court and gets an injunction asking the woman to stop emailing anyone. She doesn't comply with the order and continues to attack the business. This entrepreneur then files contempt of court. WOMAN THEN USES THE BRAHMASTRA : A FALSE RAPE CASE She cites a date 7 months ago and alleges that the entrepreneur raped her. Luckily this man was visiting a temple far away on that date and police realizes that the case is totally concocted and a counter blast. They close the case and submit final report as false in court recommending action against the woman She files a protest petition and never shows her face again in court IT HAS BEEN 12 YEARS NOW THAT THE CASE IS RUNNING. SHE DOES NOT COME TO COURT AND THIS MAN IS STILL STUCK WITH THIS FALSE RAPE CASE #FalseRape
41
287
12
1,214
43,129
Cineobserver retweeted
LIVE: The Public Impeachment of Gyanesh Kumar | 10 Rajaji Marg, New Delhi teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/2RezPKlmJ…
972
3,182
265
10,097
588,531
Cineobserver retweeted
Patriarchy existed to STOP OTHER MEN. You really think men invented patriarchy to hold YOU down? You are too weak, too fragile, too irrelevant for men to waste invention on you. Men invented patriarchy to protect their lands, food, money, resources, women and children FROM MEN. 500 years ago women didn't know what patriarchy was because it was SURVIVAL. No police. No 911. No guns. No cell phones. If a rival tribe wanted you, they killed your men, raped you, took your land, took your food, and married you off to their sons or kept you as maids, servants, and sex slaves. That was history. Patriarchy said: TOUCH HER AND YOU DIE. She belongs to this man, this family, this tribe. That was not oppression. That was a DEATH THREAT to other men to keep you safe. Pregnancy = 9 months useless. Breastfeeding mother can't run, can't fight, baby cries and brings wolves. Who hunted? MEN. Who fought bears? MEN. Who fought other men? MEN. Who built houses in snow? MEN. Who died in wars? 90% MEN. If men left women alone to be "independent" in 1500, you would have gone EXTINCT in one winter. No food. No fire. No protection. You are alive today because of patriarchy. Modern luxury - AC, Uber Eats, iPhone, birth control, police made yall RETARDED and ungrateful. You think world was always safe. You think animals don't hunt humans for food? Who stopped all these? Patriarchy. Men who built walls, laws, armies, civilization so you can sit on TikTok with fake eyelashes and say "patriachy oppress me." You are not oppressed. You are PROTECTED and too dumb to know it. Without patriarchy, you wouldn't be CEOs. You'd be extinct or a sex slave to the strongest man in your own village that’s been conquered by the enemy. Patriarchy is not why you are suffering. Patriarchy is why you are ALIVE to complain.
Patriarchy didn’t come from God it was written by men, edited by men, interpreted by men and enforced on women in God’s name.
707
6,374
548
28,687
879,910
Cineobserver retweeted
The post-production works of #GoatTheMovie have been successfully completed at @AnnapurnaStdios All set to roar in theatres WW on NOV 12th❤️‍🔥 #GOATOnNov12th @sudheeranand @divyabarti2801 @VedavyasAkula @IamEluruSreenu @madurimadhu1 @RainbowMedia_ @saregamasouth @AsianCinemas_
8
38
1
142
1,934
Cineobserver retweeted
Be prepared, guys, because you’re going to see these trends quite a lot now, and you know why? Because the oldest Gen Z woman is about to turn 30 next year, and a bunch of women also hate working. Not every woman has an email job, and the ones who do will end up losing it within the next few years. And you know what else will happen? You will see a bunch of promiscuous women entering churches in record numbers while most good men leave, just like how they left the nightlife, and just like how they are careful around all the tripods in the gyms from women who are recording for their 500 followers on Instagram. You will read headlines like "women are becoming God fearing, why aren't the men doing the same?" As a result, you will have the media bashing men even more for “not stepping up” and “not wanting marriage” with these women, when in reality they’re just avoiding promiscuous women as a whole who will grift off Christianity. You will hear a lot of Scripture being used against you, specially when you state that you don't want a woman who slept around and it will typically be this verse: Matthew 7:1: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged.” And you know what else is funny about this whole trend you're going to see? They're still all feminists because the option of being a feminist will always be there, given it's already encoded in society.
Gen Z women are bringing the traditional wife back. Marriage. Motherhood. Homemaking. Family over corporate ambition. Women choose the life they truly want.
362
1,903
103
17,954
777,465
Cineobserver retweeted
Dave Foley was ordered to pay his ex-wife $17,700 a month in child support. That was five times what he actually earned. If he set foot in Canada, he would be arrested at the border. When he asked the judge how he’d feed his daughter from his second marriage, he says the court’s answer was simple: “They can rot in hell.” In 1997, Foley was starring on NBC’s NewsRadio and making about $1 million a year. That year, he separated from his first wife, Tabatha Southey. An Ontario judge set his payments at $17,700 a month, or $212,400 a year after taxes, based on his sitcom salary. Two years later, NBC canceled the show. His income dropped by nearly 80%. He went back to court to lower the payments. The judge said no. The court ruled he had made $1 million once, so he should keep paying like he still did. His ex-wife lived in a $2.5 million house on a park in Toronto. Foley rented a small loft in downtown LA. By 2011, he owed more than $500,000 in back payments. Ontario threatened to pull his passport and issued a warrant for his arrest if he came home. In the video below, Foley explains the math: “I’m paying about five times my income every month in child support, based on a show that hasn’t been on for 12 years.” He couldn’t work in Canada again until he landed a new sitcom in 2014 and had his paychecks garnished at the source. The case for the court: a parent shouldn’t get to slash support just because their career slows down. The case for Dave: locking a canceled actor into 1990s sitcom money under threat of prison is extortion. Should child support be tied to what you earn today, or the best year you ever had?
1,552
1,839
210
19,860
2,168,350
Cineobserver retweeted
🚨 SUPREME COURT | “Can you show any justification for this loot?” A cancer patient’s husband, a medical distributor, told the Supreme Court that an injection available to him at a dealer price of ₹11,000 was allegedly priced at ₹1.30 lakh by a reputed hospital, which refused to administer the injection he offered. “Why this difference? Where does the money go?” Justice Sandeep Mehta asks the Centre.
56
966
37
3,146
148,119
Cineobserver retweeted
Replying to @LawBeatInd
The MRP printed on this IV infusion set is ₹180. this product is available at some medical shops for just ₹30–₹40. Yet, hospital pharmacies charge ₹180 for it. Why are ordinary people being exploited like this? Why is this issue not being taken seriously by the authorities?
5
8
67
4,575
Cineobserver retweeted
The #FemaleRationalisationHamster explained. The name for the tireless little engine in a woman’s mind that retroactively justifies whatever she already FELT like doing. This explains almost everything about female psychology in as simple a format as possible:
111
656
71
6,013
291,803
Idhennada idhu, feministhukku vandha sodhana?😂😂😂
76
Wonderfully showcasing what feminism is all about! Brilliant!
The best influencers from Telugu.👌😃
1
96
248
836
403
7,619
1,413,784
Cineobserver retweeted
My lords in the Supreme Court .. are you silently watching.. ??? #justasking
🚨MASSIVE BREAKING : THE HINDU Just drop Biggest BOMB on Traitor Gyanesh & dictator MODI 🔥 (MUST Read & Share) 61,059 applications to delete voters. Filed by election officials themselves. Not ONE gives a reason. 💀 → Form 7 is the form used to object to a voter's name and get it deleted. → In Karnataka, at least 61,059 Form 7s were filed in the name of election officials. One-third of all such forms. → Not a single one mentions a reason. The law says an objection without a reason is liable to be rejected. → The officers named on these forms say the system "auto-generated" them with their digital signatures. → So the same machinery raised the objection, and the same machinery decided who stays. → Between Aug 24 and Sep 23, only 192 such forms were filed by officials. → Then, AFTER the objection period ended, more than 60,800 came in. → On the very last day, Oct 22, officials filed 10,105 forms. → Spot checks found names were already deleted, even for forms filed after the deadline. → It is unclear whether hearing notices, which are mandatory before deletion, were even issued. Now connect the dots. Officials say they didn't fill these forms. The "system" did, with their signatures. Whose system is it? Election Commission's. Who runs the Election Commission? Gyanesh Kumar. So a software is allegedly deleting voters, in the name of officers, without a reason, after the deadline. And nobody, not the voter, not the public, can check why. Bro, imagine. Someone forges your signature on a cheque. The bank says, "Don't worry, the system did it automatically." And the money is already gone before you even find out. That's what is happening to people's VOTE. That's not SIR. That's silent deletion. Gyanesh , who told your software to sign deletion forms in officers' names? Modi , voters deleted without reason, after the deadline. Who is this "system" working for? 🔥🔥🔥
300
2,681
24
8,276
126,877
#SaiPallavi plays a character called #NithyaReddy, a cop, in director #RajkumarPeriasamy's #OM, featuring #Dhanush and #Mammootty in the lead.
130
Cineobserver retweeted
Throwback : Rajinikanth x Vivek Conversation❤️Thalaivar’s Reply🔥👏🏾
22
501
4
4,557
159,819
#ChefDamu passes away. May his soul rest in peace! #Damu
420
Cineobserver retweeted
A journey of two souls, countless family emotions & a lifetime of beautiful memories ❤️✨ #IdupuKayitham GRAND RELEASE WORLDWIDE ON DECEMBER 11th, 2026! 😍 A wholesome cinematic experience for you & your family! ❤️✨ #IdupuKayithamOnDec11th #IK
6
132
2
425
6,657
Remember this young boy from Arunachal Pradesh? 💔 Back in August, he posted a heartbreaking video warning about Chinese intrusions into Indian territory. Andbhakts and Godi Media branded him as a “Chinese agent” Now, the ITBP DG’s remarks about clashes since July raise serious questions. Mr. Modi, why was this boy attacked instead of being heard? Why were Indians kept in the dark about reports from our own border?
153
3,493
103
11,217
177,261