code, chem, demoscene, rave, ๐Ÿฆ‹https://xitter.cf/t.co/x5zlMpCdv2, @milliways2342/@freeside_irc, ccc, EN/DE, she/her ๐Ÿ’Šknows a thing or two about a thing or two๐Ÿ’พ ๐ŸŽจudderly amoosing๐Ÿ„

Berlin, Germany
Joined September 2014
intelligent thoughts have always followed her but she was faster
1
3
29
Mara ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ retweeted
the kings name? paamayim nekudotayim
1
4
297
Mara ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ retweeted
Chat Control 1 is back. Despite the European Parliament voting down the legislation twice this year, the Council of the European Union and parts of the Parliament today managed โ€“ through an urgent procedure โ€“ to extend it for another two years. The law was originally introduced as temporary legislation, so that its effectiveness could be evaluated. At the end of 2025, the European Commission itself concluded that it was not possible to determine whether the law had any measurable effect. Even so, it has now been pushed through. Some of today's amendments could have stopped the law. And a majority of the voting MEPs wanted to do so. By a margin of 314-276, the Parliament voted to reject the proposal through these amendments. However, since it was an urgent procedure, 361 votes were required. As a result, the majority lost today and Chat Control 1 was passed. The urgent procedure was a dirty play by the Council and parts of the Parliament โ€“ itโ€™s a procedure not meant to be used on legislation already rejected by the Parliament. For now, Chat Control 1 will remain in effect. This means that tech companies may continue scanning communications without a warrant or suspicion. However, the real battle is Chat Control 2. Unlike Chat Control 1, it would require all providers to scan communications, and to do so far more extensively than Chat Control 1 ever has.
88
973
61
4,892
175,915
tried to resurrect an old webusb project of mine, turns out these days it blocks access to like, most interface classes with no way to even request a claim? i know their reasoning, but at that point which use cases even remain?
1
1
2
534
back in uhhhhhhhh chrome 61 my proof of concept worked out of the box, now there's not even experimental flags i can poke. useless tech is webbluetooth any good or are all of these APIs just straight garbage? (aside from webserial which at least *works* ... last i checked)
1
1
161
just ran into this again while trying to see if something could be driven through a browser. looks like they've still not figured it out
34
people are crying about this but, i dont know if this even is overreaching to be honest because the user attempted to play competitive games with cheat hardware, the game decides to disable the cheat hardware this seems like a pretty reasonable cause and effect
congrats to the owners of a brand new $6k paperweight
1
2
313
i think if you reach the point where you need to set up DMA cheats in fucking valorant just to get a kill it probably is a better investment to get some video game coaching instead of a $6k pcie card that plays the game for you
2
1
154
kernel-level anti cheat drivers are overreaching for a whole array of different reasons, like security posture and privacy concerns, which is also why i don't play those things, but disabling detected dma cheats using iommu is literally the software working as intended
100
Mara ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ retweeted
21
923
64
7,436
136,327
Mara ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ retweeted
In this world you either crank that soulja boy or it cranks you
1
3
482
oh, hey, they fixed the bug in Tahoe. only took them two major OS versions
i wish the macos windowserver wasn't leaking memory like crazy. my most common reason for rebooting recently has been me realizing that system processes decided to eat 20gb of my ram again and things start slowing down a little from being a few dozen gb deep in swap debt
3
387
>download mac software >look inside >the pkg is empty aside from a preinstall script that downloads and installs a different pkg >that one installs a launch agent to inject env vars into the whole-ass session what are these people Smoking
5
275
sudo wget
โš ๏ธ Warning โš ๏ธ Kali has a new signing key! ๐Ÿ”‘ (Manual action required! ๐Ÿซฃ) If you are getting: > Missing key 827C8569F2518CC677FECA1AED65462EC8D5E4C5, which is needed to verify signature. You need to download and install the new key manually, hereโ€™s the one-liner: ``` sudo wget archive.kali.org/archive-keyโ€ฆ -O /usr/share/keyrings/kali-archive-keyring.gpg ``` Blog post: A New Kali Linux Archive Signing Key ~ kali.org/blog/new-kali-archiโ€ฆ
1
2
337
Mara ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ retweeted
biting into a hepa filter like an ice cream sandwich
1
5
354
"a man checks his pockets to find he's ran out of tissues and you think that man is me?" "no. i am the one who stocks"
2
218
the kings name? paamayim nekudotayim
1
4
297
snorted a line of node.js onceโ€”event loops had me async for days, couldn't even promise I'd recover
1
11
258
started microdosing Haskell, spent the night seeing monads but now i'm questioning the purity.
1
5
197
someone smoked our Kubernetes so all we had left were these Docker pods that got us containerized last time
3
164
"i would eat drywall with mayo." "not even to prove a point, just because i think i can" "s-should i prove it to you? because i would." do i let her take a bite out of the drywall?
4
197