
code, chem, demoscene, rave, ๐ฆhttps://xitter.cf/t.co/x5zlMpCdv2, @milliways2342/@freeside_irc, ccc, EN/DE, she/her ๐knows a thing or two about a thing or two๐พ ๐จudderly amoosing๐
Berlin, Germany
Joined September 2014
- Tweets8.5K
- Following928
- Followers1K
- Likes12.1K
Mara ๐๏ธ retweeted
Chat Control 1 is back. Despite the European Parliament voting down the legislation twice this year, the Council of the European Union and parts of the Parliament today managed โ through an urgent procedure โ to extend it for another two years. The law was originally introduced as temporary legislation, so that its effectiveness could be evaluated. At the end of 2025, the European Commission itself concluded that it was not possible to determine whether the law had any measurable effect. Even so, it has now been pushed through.
Some of today's amendments could have stopped the law. And a majority of the voting MEPs wanted to do so. By a margin of 314-276, the Parliament voted to reject the proposal through these amendments. However, since it was an urgent procedure, 361 votes were required. As a result, the majority lost today and Chat Control 1 was passed. The urgent procedure was a dirty play by the Council and parts of the Parliament โ itโs a procedure not meant to be used on legislation already rejected by the Parliament.
For now, Chat Control 1 will remain in effect. This means that tech companies may continue scanning communications without a warrant or suspicion.
However, the real battle is Chat Control 2. Unlike Chat Control 1, it would require all providers to scan communications, and to do so far more extensively than Chat Control 1 ever has.
tried to resurrect an old webusb project of mine, turns out these days it blocks access to like, most interface classes with no way to even request a claim? i know their reasoning, but at that point which use cases even remain?
back in uhhhhhhhh chrome 61 my proof of concept worked out of the box, now there's not even experimental flags i can poke. useless tech
is webbluetooth any good or are all of these APIs just straight garbage? (aside from webserial which at least *works* ... last i checked)
people are crying about this but,
i dont know if this even is overreaching to be honest
because the user attempted to play competitive games with cheat hardware, the game decides to disable the cheat hardware
this seems like a pretty reasonable cause and effect
i think if you reach the point where you need to set up DMA cheats in fucking valorant just to get a kill it probably is a better investment to get some video game coaching instead of a $6k pcie card that plays the game for you
oh, hey, they fixed the bug in Tahoe. only took them two major OS versions
>download mac software
>look inside
>the pkg is empty aside from a preinstall script that downloads and installs a different pkg
>that one installs a launch agent to inject env vars into the whole-ass session
what are these people Smoking
sudo wget
โ ๏ธ Warning โ ๏ธ
Kali has a new signing key! ๐
(Manual action required! ๐ซฃ)
If you are getting:
> Missing key 827C8569F2518CC677FECA1AED65462EC8D5E4C5, which is needed to verify signature.
You need to download and install the new key manually, hereโs the one-liner:
```
sudo wget archive.kali.org/archive-keyโฆ -O /usr/share/keyrings/kali-archive-keyring.gpg
```
Blog post: A New Kali Linux Archive Signing Key ~ kali.org/blog/new-kali-archiโฆ
"a man checks his pockets to find he's ran out of tissues and you think that man is me?"
"no. i am the one who stocks"
snorted a line of node.js onceโevent loops had me async for days, couldn't even promise I'd recover












