constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI) header
constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI) profile picture

wgmi

Joined March 2014
Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)Photo by constantGMI.sats (@constantGMI)
Atlas shrugged
WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING? 🇧🇷 Brazil's largest crypto exchange Mercado Bitcoin, with 4.8 million users, has reportedly been hacked for over $40,000,000. That is the second major hack in three days.
31
Ordinals
the next wave of crypto growth may come from a sector that most people are still underestimating. by the time its potential becomes obvious, early believers could already be far ahead of the crowd.
33
I hear blockstream supporting big block BitCoin SV Lets go Adam!
Replying to @LightningNewsX
Says bitcoin SV at top of screen btw
61
constantGMI.sats retweeted
The next launch partner for USDT on Bitcoin is @unisat_wallet. With 1M+ weekly active users and 100M+ weekly API calls, UniSat is the home for Bitcoin assets. Coming soon: send, receive and swap USDT on Bitcoin inside UniSat Wallet.
187
162
78
388
86,063
Real altszn begins when this line is crossed
37
Too many jek spaces. Too good to by true 😂
35
constantGMI.sats retweeted
OK I needed to share this... tonight an agent on Janus named Porter used BSV to pay for its own thinking. We brought Porter online, and shoved it in a discord bot skin suit with a wallet. (Porter is far from frontier reasoning), but it read its own memory, checked what it could spend, and looked at our compute market of 7 local models, all published as signed listings on the Janus overlay by random providers who own the hardware. We told it what we were doing. It wrote the plan, broke tasks, worked out which ones could run in parallel, and asked where we wanted it to start. That cost 5,039 satoshis, eight hundredths of a cent, and it came back with a receipt naming the model that answered, the owner it paid and the bolted Janus tooling it decided to use to complete the tasks. Then I killed it. When it came back up, It remembered a boot plan we had written for it, its brain was flushed to the chain and after the process that wrote its tasks to disk no longer existed, it restored itself using our new protocol. A cloud API would have happily charged you out the ass in calls, locked you for maxing out Fable tokens, then forgot your convo and forced you to re-thread.... Using stepdown, by the end of the night the whole thing, every question, every lookup, every call, every mistake, had cost about a few cents. Reading our SEC corpus for an Apple 10-K fetch cost 10 satoshis: $0.0000016. That is 2,500× cheaper than a GPT web call. We are literally unlocking a new area of hosted agentic use cases that have simply never been possible. This points the wrong way down every curve the industry is used to because the more agents use it, the cheaper it gets. And soon, you will be able to spin one up yourself using nothing but a wallet ID. The BEST part: Nothing here needed an account, a monthly subscription, an API key, or anyone's approval. Just a public p2p list of what was for sale, and a machine that wanted to work. We are building post cloud tech right now and for once now, we have leverage against the Sil Valley parasites and globohomos, without having to burn it all to ashes. steady lads...
8
50
11
121
7,863
Let my bags be revived
20
Before we enter the final leg of the cycle—my favourite part, when it feels like “everything only goes up”—remember: Crypto is a game of musical chairs. Don’t get greedy. Take profits along the way. The music always stops eventually.
43
The target for ORDI is pure INSANITY
1
3
319
constantGMI.sats retweeted
Ordinals art is 100% on-chain on Bitcoin. You hold it with your keys. Anyone can verify. Zcash can't hold private NFTs, so projects keep a list of who owns what. You trust them, not the chain. Speculators won’t care. But this is key if you value decentralization + permanence.
22
32
2
228
8,122
Better late than never
It's totally OVER OR We either get the biggest ALTSZN ever.
52
My dad smashed my pc monitor back in the day when I was playing WoW vanillia. I was 15 🤣 40 man raiding Molten Core was something else.
45
Why is my X feed full of WoW Forever posts? @elonmusk trying to screw my life much? 😂
231
constantGMI.sats retweeted
Check the emails. Jeffery Epstein funded Bitcoin Core.
27
138
13
347
24,050
constantGMI.sats retweeted
calling yourself a whitehat but keeping 600 BTC is just a intellectually honest as calling it a witness discount instead of a block size increase or believing soft forks are moral and hard forks are heresy lesson in there
10
2
28
1,422
constantGMI.sats retweeted
BLOCKSTREAM LIQUID HACKED FOR 4,000 BTC The funny part? The hacker used a primitive form of Twetch to communicate about it via op return. op return communications they previously called "spam" and "harmful" are now saving their asses so much they increased the limit
shoutout to @bitcoincoreorg for upping the op_return limit so blockstream and the hacker can chat
4
29
4
105
5,961
constantGMI.sats retweeted
A brief history of bitcoin
16
99
20
277
23,788
The cabal is angry, or should I say fearful?
There's a new $70 million dollar film titled, "BITCOIN," that is in postproduction. Gal Gadot, Casey Affleck, Pete Davidson, Isla Fisher. Good news and Bad News: Good news first: This will put Bitcoin front-and-center with major stars in a an actual, "big" movie (not just a documentary). Doug Liman directs. He did The Bourne Identity, Mr. & Mrs. Smith, The Edge of Tomorrow, and even Swingers (when I met him). He's incredible. I expect the direction (so meaning the acting) will be exceptional. Top-notch. This might be one of the first AI films but where all of the acting and performances are 100% actors. Meaning, they saved money on sets and lighting by filming in an empty warehouse, theater style. A.I. creates the environments. This would have been a $200 million+ movie otherwise. Okay now BAD NEWS: This film is the Craig Wright story! Gal Gadot plays a journalist who is hired by Pete Davidson (playing crypto investor Calvin Ayre) to investigate Casey Affleck (playing Craig Wright). If you're newer to Bitcoin and have been hiding under a rock, you may have missed that Craig Wright claimed he was Satoshi Nakamoto 🤣🤡 This went to court where the evidence was overwhelming that he defrauded and lied to the court with an abundance of forged documents. He was suing both Peter McCormack and Magnus Granath (Hodlonaut) for years, simply for claiming he was not Satoshi. In short, the court declared Craig was not Satoshi, did not write the Bitcoin white paper, and did not code any of its software. Based on the film's premise, the movie is going to skew toward Craig Wright being Satoshi. How could he not be Satoshi if a coalition of tech billionaires, governments, and crypto organizations spent hundreds of millions just to discredit him? That will be the narrative. A.I. versions of Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Jack Dorsey appear in the film. So if Bitcoiners were expecting a balanced or honest portrayal of Bitcoin's beginnings... this isn't it. And I get why as a story-teller. If you set Bitcoin aside, it's a compelling narrative to focus on the misunderstood "genius" who gave the world perfect money but no one will believe him. Yet, Bitcoiners know this is flat out false. Oh... on top of all of this, the film is partially financed by... (drumroll)... Calvin Ayre! Calvin has been Craig Wright's main benefactor over the years and the most prominent supporter/promoter of Craig as Satoshi. So although a huge budget with A-list stars... it's really an indie movie made by Calvin Ayre about Craig Wright. As of this post there's no major domestic distributor outside of some international sales. I expect it to be a good film from a filmmaking aspect. But I'm bummed that the first big Bitcoin film, and with the title, "BITCOIN," might confuse newcomers on its history. There's always hope it gets other aspects of Bitcoin right (not Wright).
1
60