Nancy

I want to go on record saying that I don’t condone attacking Scott Presler for his sexual orientation. But I would like to sincerely ask all of the people who keep rushing to his defense to please consider something. If we take for granted that Scott was once a poor guy, traveling around in his car on his own to register voters- that’s not who he is now today, and hasn’t been for some time. He’s now a grown man, around 40 years old, running a multimillion-dollar operation whose stated goal is voter registration and helping Republicans win elections. He’s earning a high six-figure annual income from his X account alone. He has around 3,500 monthly subscribers on X, each paying him $3 a month. That’s over $10K a month BEFORE being paid out by the X creator program, which brings in an additional five figures every month. The point is: My public criticisms of Scott have never been based on his sexuality, his appearance, or his demeanor. I have ONLY criticized glaring gaps and discrepancies in what Scott tells people on social media about the work he’s doing, the results he’s getting, and the impact it is having. I have asked many questions about things I believe are VERY serious instances of misleading the public, bordering on misconduct. Each time I’ve brought these things up, I am besieged by a mob of Scott’s supporters who tell me I’m only asking these questions because I’m jealous, or because I must have been turned down by Scott. Not once have any of these people been willing to simply address the concerns I’ve raised. This behavior has never made sense—but it CERTAINLY does not make sense anymore and cannot be tolerated in the face of a MASSIVE defeat for Republicans like we had on Tuesday. This is not me-or others asking the same questions- picking on a poor, defenseless guy who’s sleeping in his car and volunteering to register voters. This is me asking the CEO of a multimillion-dollar operation that claims to flip districts red through its voter registration efforts- and who is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for this work- to explain MASSIVE holes and discrepancies in the organization’s claims and the handling of its finances, which I believe also shows signs of significant corruption. Charlie Kirk would have had to answer questions like this. I would have to answer questions like this. James O’Keefe has had to answer questions like this. Dennis Prager would have to answer questions like this. So why are the rules different for Scott? Any other CEO of any other organization with this consistent track record of failure, while the CEO is making a fortune and the organization is bringing in millions—which are NOT being used for the stated goal of the organization—would have to be accountable and AT LEAST provide answers, transparency, and accountability to the public about what’s going on. Scott refuses to answer any of these questions, but continues massive fundraising and an ongoing track record of failure. Scott Presler is not a child. He’s not a homeless man registering voters out of the kindness of his heart. It is time to stop treating him like a baby and begin treating him like a CEO whose organization is not delivering on its promises—and which I believe is not operating in the good faith that the public has been misled to believe. For these reasons, and because I am tired of Republicans losing elections that could have been prevented, I am NOT going to stop asking these questions about Scott Presler. I am going to continue to publish my findings about what is going on with this operation. If people want to keep shielding him from accountability and treating him like he’s an infant who can’t answer for himself and try to shame me into silence by accusing me of being jealous or a jilted lover- I do not care. The truth matters. I will continue investigating these concerns and publicly sharing my findings, regardless of the pressure or criticism I receive on social media.