
Head of Institutions @blend_money | Stablecoins @noon_capital | Co-Founder @Ribera_Money | Ex: @reserveprotocol @uglycash
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined June 2020
- Tweets49.6K
- Following363
- Followers56.1K
- Likes193K
Criptolawyer retweeted
Venezuela tiene la oportunidad de construir uno de los sistemas financieros más modernos de América Latina.
Mientras buena parte de América Latina y Europa continúa financiando sus economías mediante sistemas financieros diseñados para el siglo pasado, Venezuela tiene la oportunidad de saltarse décadas de atraso y convertirse en un referente mundial de innovación financiera.
Si aprovechamos tecnologías como la tokenización de activos y las stablecoins, podríamos desarrollar nuevas formas de financiar empresas, proyectos energéticos e infraestructura, facilitando la participación de inversionistas nacionales e internacionales.
Esto nos permitiría movilizar capital a una escala mucho mayor, impulsar nuevos sectores productivos y acelerar significativamente el crecimiento económico de nuestro país.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Es todo un honor contar con la pluma de @criptolawyer en nuestra nueva edición Developing 🌐
Si visión sobre el futuro de los pagos con la integración de la IA es de gran valor para nuestros lectores.
Disfruta el artículo desde nuestra web 👇🏻
btctechno.io/magazine/develo…
Si un agente de IA hace un pago por ti y algo sale mal, ¿quién responde?
De eso escribí en mi más reciente artículo para @btctechnomag: de lo que pasa cuando un software empieza a tomar decisiones con dinero real.
Las stablecoins ya permiten que estos agentes hagan pago, pero poder ejecutar una operación no resuelve lo que viene después: quién la autorizó, qué podía hacer el agente y qué controles había cuando salió el dinero.
No basta con saber de quién es la cuenta. Hay que poder explicar por qué se hizo cada pago y demostrar que estaba dentro de lo permitido.
En LATAM, esto no depende de que llegue una ley de inteligencia artificial. Ya hay obligaciones de identificación, prevención de lavado y control cambiario que cumplir.
Para las empresas, el reto es ese: no solo hacer que el agente pague, sino poder rendir cuentas por lo que hace.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Good analysis by @criptolawyer on the implications of the U.S. Treasury’s new proposed investment rules for Venezuela.
Treasury has clarified that Venezuela no longer meets the definition of a “country of concern” under this specific framework, which regulates U.S. investments in sensitive technologies, including AI and advanced semiconductors.
However, this does not mean that American companies can now invest freely in Venezuela.
OFAC sanctions remain in place, and certain investments may still face restrictions depending on the companies involved, their ownership structures, and their connections to other countries of concern.
The proposed rules are also not yet final.
This is an encouraging policy signal, but removing regulatory barriers and restoring Venezuela’s access to American capital and financial services will require additional policy reforms at the @USTreasury and @CommerceGov level, among others.
Venezuela is back in the investment headlines.
But does that mean American companies can now invest freely? Not quite.
Here’s what actually happened: @USTreasury says Venezuela does not currently meet the “country of concern” definition in its proposed rules on American investment in sensitive technologies, including AI and advanced chips.
In plain English, these rules are about where US capital goes and whether it helps develop technologies that could pose a national security risk. They are not a general rulebook for every investment, bank account or payment involving Venezuela.
And that’s the distinction getting lost in the headline: this is NOT a blanket lifting of OFAC sanctions. Some investments in Venezuelan entities could also remain covered through links to other countries of concern.
For investors, banks and fintechs, the practical questions still matter: who receives the money, who owns the business, what the transaction involves, and which restrictions or authorizations apply.
My takeaway: a meaningful policy signal worth watching, but not an automatic reopening of every financial door. And these are still proposed rules, not a final rule already in force.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Most platforms hold client balances that earn nothing between payments.
With Blend, that float becomes a revenue line:
→ keep the yield on your own float
→ share it with your users
→ launch an earn product under your brand
One integration. Live in 2 days.
Replying to @reinaldolugo120 @criptolawyer @cashi @binance @CocoWallets @Uglycash @OKXMoneyLATAM @SomosZinli @UpholdInc @Bybit_Latam @BitgetWalletES @P2Pdotme @belo_app
No esta bloqueada Venezuela, ni por ubicación ni por documentos. Me cuentas cual fue tu experiencia?
Criptolawyer retweeted
Venezuela 🇻🇪 lo prometido es deuda:
Ranking de 18 billeteras y exchanges que funcionan hoy para Venezolanos en Venezuela.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Replying to @criptolawyer @cashi @binance @CocoWallets @Uglycash @OKXMoneyLATAM @SomosZinli @UpholdInc @Bybit_Latam @BitgetWalletES @P2Pdotme
En Bybit, la Tarjeta en Venezuela ya esta lista para todos y también pueden pedir la física
Criptolawyer retweeted
Blend is at @money2020 this week.
If you’re building a fintech, neobank or wallet and your users’ balances sit idle, let’s grab 20 minutes.
Send us a DM!
Criptolawyer retweeted
Si viajas desde LATAM a EUROPA, te comparto algunas tarjetas que puedes cargar con USDT / USDC para pagar en euros sin problemas.
@EthenaPay @ether_fi @coca_card @KASTxyz @MetaMask @arq_finance @Plasma @Uglycash @RedotPay @itstuyo @Bybit_Official
Y el truco es siempre marcar EUR en el posnet al pagar y no USD porque vas a perder bastante por el tipo de cambio local.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Replying to @Criptoinforme @criptolawyer
Tabla completa 👇
criptoinforme.com/tutoriales…
Criptolawyer retweeted
Gran lista, @criptolawyer 🙌 La verificamos tarjeta por tarjeta para quienes viajan desde LATAM:
👉 No todas aceptan tu país: varias excluyen a Venezuela, Chile o Bolivia
👉 Pagar en euros cuesta de 0% a 7% según la tarjeta
👉 Tu truco de elegir EUR lo confirma la Comisión Europea
Tabla completa 👇 criptoinforme.com/tutoriales…
Si viajas desde LATAM a EUROPA, te comparto algunas tarjetas que puedes cargar con USDT / USDC para pagar en euros sin problemas.
@EthenaPay @ether_fi @coca_card @KASTxyz @MetaMask @arq_finance @Plasma @Uglycash @RedotPay @itstuyo @Bybit_Official
Y el truco es siempre marcar EUR en el posnet al pagar y no USD porque vas a perder bastante por el tipo de cambio local.
Criptolawyer retweeted
16 crypto cards for paying in Europe, compared by @criptolawyer. COCA is in the top 3 🫡
Worth saving for your next trip.
Si viajas desde LATAM a EUROPA, te comparto algunas tarjetas que puedes cargar con USDT / USDC para pagar en euros sin problemas.
@EthenaPay @ether_fi @coca_card @KASTxyz @MetaMask @arq_finance @Plasma @Uglycash @RedotPay @itstuyo @Bybit_Official
Y el truco es siempre marcar EUR en el posnet al pagar y no USD porque vas a perder bastante por el tipo de cambio local.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Criptolawyer, es abogada venezolana radicada en Buenos Aires. Trabaja donde se cruzan la regulación y Bitcoin; hoy es Head of Institutional BD en Blend, infraestructura financiera para fintechs, neobancos e instituciones.
@criptolawyer
Criptolawyer retweeted
Heading pretty soon 🔜 to europe so plz recommend me the best crypto cards to top up with USDT / USDC, obviously need the best rates.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Spent 4k in one of this flashy big neobanks and i only got 8$ on cashback. My bad for not using @ethena😂
Criptolawyer retweeted
being a fintech isn’t enough anymore. everyone wants to be a bank:
a growing number of fintech companies want to own the banks behind their apps.
the reason becomes pretty clear when you look at how these businesses work.
you can build the app, acquire the customers and handle the entire user experience. but if another bank holds the license, that bank still has a say in which products you can offer, what risks you can take and how much it costs to serve each customer.
owning a bank can give you more control over those decisions. it can also let you take deposits and use that funding to lend.
that changes the economics of the business. it also changes what you’re responsible for.
why companies are buying the bank
@Chime is a useful example.
it agreed to pay $590M for Stride Bank (@BankStride), a banking partner it has worked with for more than seven years. Chime projects more than $100M in net synergies from reducing partner-bank fees, expanding lending and lowering its funding costs.
the deal is expected to close in the first half of 2027, subject to approvals. those savings are still projections, but they explain why owning the bank could be worth the investment.
a fintech that already has millions of customers has already done much of the work of building distribution. acquiring a bank can help it offer more products to those customers and keep more of the revenue those products generate.
@Payward, the parent of Kraken (@krakenfx), is pursuing a similar opportunity through its agreement to acquire Saldo Bank.
the acquisition would add European banking capabilities, including interest-bearing deposits and lending, to its existing infrastructure. closing is expected in 2027, subject to regulatory approval.
the same interest in owning banking infrastructure is showing up across Latin America.
@cocoscap completed its acquisition of Banco Voii (@banco_voii) in Argentina on June 29. @Revolut received BCRA approval to acquire Cetelem in September, although that approval is separate from closing the acquisition and launching services to customers.
@nubank agreed to acquire Porto Real in Brazil. in that case, the acquisition also addresses rules around the use of banking names by adding a banking license to Nubank’s existing authorizations.
the reasons vary by company and market. some want better economics. some want new capabilities. others have a specific regulatory requirement to meet.
buying an existing bank is only one route
companies can also apply to build a bank from scratch.
Nubank, @mercury and Revolut received conditional approvals to establish national banks in the US.
for digital asset companies, national trust banks are another route, with a different scope of activities.
in December 2025, the OCC announced conditional approvals for new national trust banks for @circle and @Ripple, alongside conditional approvals for @BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets (@DigitalAssets) and @Paxos to convert their state-chartered entities to the federal regime.
Agora (@withAUSD), the group behind AUSD, received preliminary conditional approval on September 18, 2026, to establish Agora National Trust Bank. its plan includes moving AUSD issuance into the bank once established. it still needs final authorization to open.
this distinction matters when you’re evaluating what these companies will actually be able to offer.
a charter focused on custody, stablecoin issuance or trust services does not automatically provide the same permissions as a full-service commercial bank. you have to look at the specific entity, its approved activities and the conditions attached.
“received approval” also doesn’t necessarily mean customers can start using the bank.
@Mercury continues to operate through partner banks while working toward final approval. Revolut’s announcement identifies remaining approvals from the FDIC, the Fed and the OCC.
the economics have to work after the acquisition
owning a bank can reduce some dependencies, but it brings costs that a fintech previously shared with, or paid to, its banking partners.
the company needs capital, liquidity, experienced management, compliance systems and an operation that can meet ongoing supervisory requirements.
regulators also assess the buyer. the ECB, for example, reviews financial soundness, reputation, management suitability, continued prudential compliance and money-laundering risk.
LevelField (@LevelfieldEx) shows why the funding requirements matter. Burling Bank confirmed that its proposed acquisition did not close because the buyer missed the regulatory deadline to raise capital. the bank’s board decided to continue independently.
even when a transaction closes, attracting deposits is only part of the job.
if customers move their savings to your app because you offer the highest rate, you need to understand how much of that money will stay when the rate changes. you also need to earn enough from your permitted activities to cover funding, operating costs and credit losses.
owning the license gives you more ways to build the business. it doesn’t make those economics work automatically.
what this means for the next generation of fintech
the acquisitions are happening in both directions.
@CapitalOne completed its acquisition of @brexHQ in April. @Mastercard completed its acquisition of @BVNKFinance in August. established financial companies are also buying technology, distribution and stablecoin capabilities that would take time to build themselves.
my read is that these companies want to handle more of the customer’s financial life within their own businesses.
once someone uses your app to get paid, keep savings and make payments, there is an opportunity to serve their borrowing and investment needs too.
i think this is where consumer fintech is heading: companies trying to become the place where you get paid, keep your savings, spend and borrow.
owning the bank can make more of that possible within one business. whether it is worth doing comes down to how much customers use it, what it costs to run, and whether the company can manage the risks.
Criptolawyer retweeted
Our CEO @mannyornothing is heading to @money2020 in Las Vegas, Oct 18–21.
Building a fintech, neobank or stablecoin product?
Let’s talk!
🤖 Made with AI






















