Here’s a chart to show why $UP actually has better fundamentals compared to early days of $AERO. UP actually accumulated more revenue for holders while paying out less incentives than AERO. Timeframe I used was when both projects started paying out emissions. Clearly UP has been much more efficient in emissions because of dynamic emissions that only bribes LPs slightly more than fees. All while generating a lot more revenue in the early days. Ofc net revenue is still less than today’s AERO. But, that’s like comparing IBM’s revenue to MSFT’s when MSFT first launched. Yet, many $AERO maxis still hate on my posts and think AERO will crush UP. I love both projects, but clearly UP is the better product because of second mover advantage. The reason why new tech is often better than old tech is because they can take all the good features, discard the bad ones, and improve upon the model. Prices will reflect this 1-3 years from now imo.