Author of Lift: The Secret to a Remarkable Life: https://xitter.cf/t.co/dFSmPV4QLB Forbes publisher and ASU professor. Beach bum philosophe.

Boston
Joined December 2011
The five takeaways from Lift: 1. Nobody is self-made. 2. Look for the person who sees your strength. 3. Build a small circle that tells you the truth. 4. Learn the rules of the room before you follow them. 5. One honest voice.
2
7
2
23
3,710
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
It’s not just the El Sayed campaign. The Dems are embracing antisemitism fully, believing it’s their ticket to finally defeat Trump. Every midterm win they get will be chalked up to more overt Jew-hatred messaging. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
Wow I don’t know if the bigger problem with an ad saying “you can’t afford groceries anymore because of Israel’s desire to kill Palestinians” is the ad or the fact that the El-Sayed team ran with this knowing the antisemitic message works.
3
11
19
450
Professors are paid to radicalize themselves. Since there is no cost to stating irrational ideas, and in fact, may be rewarded wtih stronger social media reaction, it is expected. It is also expected that their teaching quality has declined, and their grading is highly biased.
1
1
41
Politics has never been uglier.
Once you see the world through this lens, a lot of things that looked random suddenly make sense. You understand why Macron recognized a Palestinian state at the UN. Not a state with borders it controls, a single government, or elections. A symbol. A gesture for domestic consumption, performed on the world stage. That's the politics of posture over reality, the obłuda I described earlier: what matters isn't what is true on the ground, it's the narrative you get to emit. You understand why Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of France's hard left and a man trained in Trotskyist organizations in his youth, made Gaza the center of his politics and refused for months to call Hamas a terrorist organization. Look at the mechanism. He doesn't address French Muslims as individuals with their own jobs, families, ambitions and disagreements. He addresses them as a bloc. A mass to be mobilized. That's the collectivist reflex in its purest form: you don't speak to people, you herd categories. Yesterday the proletariat, today identity blocs. The individual disappears every time. You understand why Zohran Mamdani built his rise on the Democratic Socialists of America. The mayor of New York isn't just a progressive Democrat. He's a DSA member, and DSA doesn't hide what it is: an organization that openly calls itself socialist and treats the Democratic Party as a vehicle. His campaign promised a rent freeze, city-run grocery stores, free buses. Every one of those ideas has the same shape: the individual steps back, the city steps in. The price is set by the planner, the store is run by the planner, and voters are addressed as categories, tenants, riders, communities, rather than as free people who can build something of their own. And Mamdani didn't come out of nowhere. The same movement helped send Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Congress in 2018, and Bernie Sanders spent decades making the word "socialist" respectable in American politics. Different faces, same software. The lie isn't that they hide their ideology. It's the promise attached to it: that you can freeze prices without killing supply, that the state can run what entrepreneurs run, that someone else will always pay. That promise has been tested on every continent. It has never been kept. And you understand the most important thing: collectivists need chaos. This isn't a metaphor. It's their own doctrine. Lenin's strategy in 1914 was to turn the war between nations into a civil war inside them. The Soviet Union spent decades arming and funding movements across the Middle East and pushed through the 1975 UN resolution equating Zionism with racism. The KGB had an entire doctrine, "active measures," dedicated to amplifying every division inside Western societies. A stable, prosperous, confident society is the collectivist's worst enemy. Chaos is his natural habitat. Why? Because chaos is the perfect justification. It justifies emergency powers. It justifies more state. It turns citizens into frightened masses looking for a shepherd. It replaces individual judgment with tribal loyalty. A society at peace with itself asks the planner: what do we need you for? Look at the two great conflicts of our time through this lens. Russia's war in Ukraine was launched by a former KGB officer who called the collapse of the Soviet Union the greatest catastrophe of the century. A man formed in the exact school that treated chaos as a weapon. He doesn't just wage war on Ukraine. He wages it on Western cohesion, feeding every division he can find in our elections, our streets, our feeds. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the perfect fuel for Western politics. It splits every campus, every party, every city. It lets politicians like Mélenchon build an electoral base on permanent outrage. And for everyone who lives off that outrage, a real peace would be a disaster. Ask yourself honestly: who in our political class actually has an interest in this conflict ending? That's the pattern. The people who live off chaos never solve it. They manage it, they feed it, they posture around it. Because a solved problem is a lost lever. Freedom produces order from the bottom up: people who own things, build things, trade with each other and have something to lose. Collectivism produces disorder from the bottom up and then sells you order from the top down. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
2
64
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Correct. Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be. Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them. Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week. Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact. Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia. SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR. That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell. End of story.
STARLINK WORKS THE SAME WAY ITS ALWAYS WORKED. ITS NOT A WEAPONS SYSTEM, NO MATTER HOW MUCH UKRAINE WANTS IT TO BE.
11,133
32,317
3,427
190,431
11,111,997
When fruit goes bad, it never recovers.
Here is my account of what happened to Scientific American before the latest meltdown, when the wokeness first began to rot this once great institution. michaelshermer.substack.com/…
1
1
3
120
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 A warning to Americans, from a Frenchman. 🚨🚨🚨 You are starting to elect people who promise you more state, more redistribution, more "free" things. New York already has a democratic socialist mayor, perhaps the furthest-left since Fiorello La Guardia. I'm not here to tell you how to vote. I'm here to tell you how this story ends, because we lived it. France ran this experiment for 40 years, and we are now living its final chapter. It starts in May 1981. François Mitterrand wins the presidency with the Communists in government. The program is pure romance. They nationalize the big banks and industrial groups. They lower the retirement age to 60, cut the work week, add a fifth week of paid vacation, create a wealth tax, and hire massively in the public sector. "Changer la vie", change life itself. That was the slogan. Reality took less than two years to answer. Capital fled. The franc was devalued three times. Inflation stayed in double digits while our neighbors were bringing theirs down. In March 1983, Mitterrand made a U-turn and imposed austerity, "le tournant de la rigueur". Remember this, because it is the pattern. Socialism doesn't fail once and disappear. It fails, reinvents itself, and changes its electorate. After 1983 the Socialists had a problem. They had abandoned the economic revolution, so what was left to sell? The answer was identity politics before the term existed. In 1984 SOS Racisme was born, closely tied to the Socialist Party. The moral battle replaced the economic one. Anyone who raised the question of immigration or integration was no longer an opponent. He was a racist. Then came the first real test. In 1989, three girls showed up to a public school in Creil wearing the Islamic veil. The Socialist government refused to decide, sent the question to the courts, and let it rot for fifteen years. The ban only came in 2004. That was the moment the Republic blinked. The message received was simple: if you push, the state will back down. Over the following decades, the left slowly replaced the working class it had lost with a new coalition. In 2011 the Socialist think tank Terra Nova wrote it down in black and white, saying they should stop chasing blue-collar workers and build a coalition of graduates, youth, and minorities. Electoral clientelism became strategy. In certain cities, local politicians traded subsidies, jobs, and silence for votes delivered by community networks, including Islamist ones. The result today is that in the 2022 presidential election, Muslim voters gave 69% of their first-round votes to Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the hard-left candidate. A party that once claimed to be secular is now courting religious identity. Let's be precise: this is not about our Muslim fellow citizens, millions of whom are fully French. It is about a political machine that decided a community vote was worth more than the principles of the Republic. Now the economy, because the two collapses are the same collapse. In 2000, the Socialist government of Lionel Jospin, with Martine Aubry as labor minister, imposed the 35-hour work week. The theory was that sharing work creates jobs. What it actually did was make French labor more expensive, destroy the culture of effort, disorganize hospitals that still haven't recovered, and teach an entire generation that work is a burden the state should shrink for you. That is the deep logic of socialism. It doesn't make people richer. It makes them dependent. Every new subsidy creates a voter who fears losing it. Every new public job creates a voter who defends the system. After a while, you no longer have citizens. You have clients. Look where it ends. France hasn't voted a balanced budget since 1974. Public debt was around 20% of GDP when Mitterrand arrived. It is now around 3,550 billion euros, about 118% of GDP. France is once again Europe's biggest spender, with public spending at 57.3% of GDP. And a report commissioned by the government in July 2026 projects that without budget efforts, debt would reach 130% of GDP by 2030. And to be completely honest, the right didn't fix any of this. Chirac, Sarkozy, Hollande, Macron: they all managed the decline instead of reversing it. The left set the direction, and the right lacked the courage to change it. That's how you get 40 years of slow rot, economic and social at the same time. A country that works less, pays more, gets less security, and no longer dares to say what it is. So today France has two choices, and so will you if you go down this road. The first choice is to stop lying to ourselves. Multiculturalism, meaning many cultures living side by side with no common rules, does not work. It never has, anywhere. When there is no shared culture on top, one culture eventually takes over the others. That's not hate, it's sociology. What worked in France for 150 years was assimilation. You come, you become French, you take on the language, the laws, the history, the way of life. In exchange, the nation takes you in fully, with no asterisk. Assimilation plus controlled immigration. And the deal is already signed with millions of people. Children of Italian, Portuguese, Polish, Algerian, Moroccan, and Vietnamese immigrants who are as French as I am. They are not the problem. They are the proof that the model works when we have the courage to apply it. The second choice is to keep pretending. Let the state get bigger, let debt explode, keep buying social peace with money we don't have, and keep handing territory to those who reject the West. In that scenario, it is not impossible that France first elects a hard-left government, a Mélenchon government. Then, when the system can't pay its promises anymore, something else fills the vacuum. Michel Houellebecq wrote that story as fiction in 2015, in a novel called Submission. A lot of French people stopped laughing at it a long time ago. France is a Western country with Western values. Equality between men and women. Freedom of expression, including the freedom to criticize religion. The law above faith. Work as dignity, not punishment. Some things are simply not acceptable here, and we need to have the courage to say it again. America, you still have what we're losing: a culture of work, a culture of assimilation, the idea that the state is your servant and not your parent. The people selling you "more state" are making the same promise Mitterrand made in 1981. It sounds generous. It ends in debt, dependence, and fragmentation. Don't trade the American Dream for the French Disease. We already paid the price. Learn from it for free.
121
1,352
107
2,919
46,247
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Elon Musk: “The reason I went so hardcore for Trump was because, to me, this was a fork in the road. If they had another four years, they would legalize enough illegals in the swing states to make the swing states not swing states, they would be blue states. Then they would win the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. And then they will keep importing more illegals to cement that outcome. Basically what happened in California. It would have been the end. That's why I went so hardcore for Trump. I invite people to do their research. The more they do their research, the more they will see that what I'm saying is absolutely true.”
511
2,315
117
8,782
136,272
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
The term “oracy” won’t float everyone’s boat, but there’s no doubt that oral language abilities need to be developed (a) in their own right and (b) to support reading and writing skills across the curriculum and across year levels. Oral language is not “set and forget”. I’ve written about this in a number of open access publications, including this one: scholar.google.com/scholar?h…
4
9
1
30
3,262
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
The vile Medea Benjamin of Code Pink is in Whole Foods claiming Dead Sea salts are “stolen Palestinian resources.” Reality: the Dead Sea borders Israel and Jordan. Jordan extracts minerals too. Israel develops its share legally. Benjamin and Code Pink were banned from Israel for radical BDS activism. I’m glad she flagged these products—I’m ordering the 365 and Dead Sea Warehouse salts now. Thanks to Whole Foods and Amazon for ignoring the “social justice/pro-Palestine” theater.
258
227
36
1,034
28,060
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Good on Elon Musk for his SpaceX accounts distributed through the Trump Accounts. Now let's solve the crisis in health care funding the same way. @TrumpAccounts @SecScottBessent @elonmusk @nypost lawliberty.org/a-trump-accou…
5
1
11
577
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Read Lift by @cunninghamjeff Remarkable book and well-written 💯 Find your First. Build your Circle. Read the Room.
3
2
5
4,808
The free speech movement at Columbia is a movement to silence it. wsj.com/us-news/education/a-…
🤖 Made with AI
5
192
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Georgetown Law’s student government is attacking my deputy chief counsel, Erielle Azerrad, for detailing the evidence about the Muslim Brotherhood. I’m proud of her for speaking the truth. These woke children expect indoctrination rather than actual education. Their hysterical declaration contains no facts. Here are the actual facts: The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization. Egypt, Saudi Arabia & the UAE have all banned, designated, or imposed restrictions on the Muslim Brotherhood for terrorism. What does it say that Georgetown Law is more embracing of Muslim Brotherhood terrorism than are Arab Middle East nations? Hamas is a Muslim Brotherhood branch and is responsible for the greatest single-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. A federal jury convicted the Holy Land Foundation and five of its leaders on 108 counts, and the HLF provided $12.4 million in support to Hamas. Federal prosecutors named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator. I chaired a hearing in August in which lead investigators testified about evidence in that case that included wiretaps, internal memos, and meeting transcripts. Calling evidence “hate speech," trying to censor it, and trying to cancel opponents doesn’t change facts. And on that note, my staff and I are not going to apologize for educating people about those facts. If Georgetown were doing its job—instead of sucking up Qatari money—it would be too.
Student law group at @Georgetown released a resolution ATTACKING Erielle Azerrad, the Deputy Chief Counsel for Sen. Ted Cruz, after she spoke at an on-campus event about the dangers of the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization. They label her comments as "hate speech" and "Islamophobic" and are demanding that the university silence this speech. Georgetown has been conquered. Sad.
173
808
22
3,022
93,855
Could it be? If so, let it be!
The UAE deputy foreign minister now candidate for UN Sec-Gen who is a scion of Jerusalem’s grandest family….
1
104
It is extraordinary to see genuine scholars fighting to pull the humanities out of academia’s long dark night. While the next generation may not fully grasp their struggle, it is the very reason a recovery is possible.
The humanities began outside the university and began entering it in the 1420s. The effect, over time, was to turn humane letters into philology. Maybe it's time to recover Petrarch's vision.
65
Jeff Cunningham retweeted
Fake Polls II It seems if you poll left it’s easy to get into the NYT poll aggregator and yet again these polls showing big leftward swings were entirely fabricated.Wedgwood polling turned out to be an “experiment” in issuing fake polling results. It’s more an experiment in fraud. And in helping certain candidates to raise money. This is no experiment but calculated fraud. Real Clear Politics and Polling once again did not fall for the ruse because Wedgwood did not meet their screening process. You gotta wonder now how much else in politics today is faked given two “polling” firms were nothing but empty fronts.
32
130
6
535
16,548