Reading maevyn.codes/decoherence alongside @EMostaque’s Intelligent Economics, I keep coming back to one question:
What happens when AI makes everyone better at solving problems within their own assumptions, while those assumptions become less compatible?
That’s why Doxa matters
Anthropological singularity > technological singularity.
I would like to see human capacities unfold so fast that technology struggles to keep up.
That feels like fertile ground for a new noospheric project.
I’m building AI on top of a belief-state engine - explicit beliefs, not just chat history. It’s already running with real users in production. Early, but it works.

