PhD candidate @YaleEconomics, on the JM in 2025/26. Mostly labor. Spare time: elite (cat 1) road bike racer + 2:44 marathoner. She/her

New Haven, CT
Joined February 2018
I'm on the job market! A little bit about my JMP here 👇
Why do some firms limit workplace flexibility, and what does that mean for inequality? Dana Scott's JMP shows that technological constraints make flexibility costly for some firms, shaping the trade-offs workers—especially women—face between flexibility and pay. Website: dana-scott.com @danascoot
12
141
39,592
Blockbuster paper from all-star team (@john_eric, @ChrisANeilson, @Xiaoyang_Ye, Seth Zimmerman) nber.org/papers/w33038
3
96
17
305
157,534
🚨New working paper with @key_z_e addressing the data gap on property insurance markets.  We develop a new dataset with over 47 million observations of homeowners insurance expenditures. nber.org/papers/w32579 The map of 2023 premiums shows massive heterogeneity:
8
46
9
149
85,180
are the kids for real
45
13
13
654
243,276
Dana Scott retweeted
France seems to be crushing it: • Builds housing • Builds transit (Anglo country difficulty level: impossible) • Leading Europe esp on defense • Green: nuclear, bikes etc • High birth rates in declining world; Paris seems like highest birth rate large metro
362
516
238
7,934
3,446,096
I was in a bookstore the other day and a guy walked in and asked where the theology section was. After being told there was no theology section, defeated, he asked if they had a copy of Thinking Fast and Slow
50 Books To Master 10 Skills
3
4,314
when you're at new haven union station and reminded that diversification and resiliency are key to any successful business strategy
3
27
11
317
92,685
i love lana del rey her lyrics are so deep
ive been muttering “diet pepi pepi diet mountain dew” to myself all morning
6
2,700
Hi #EconTwitter!✍️ Working on perfecting your writing style for #economics papers and essays? Check out this useful resource by @VaranyaChaubey on improving your research paper writing skills. Tailored for PhD candidates and postdocs but useful for everyone! Plus, don’t miss Varanya’s 2020 guide on refining the first draft of your paper. Highly recommended! ⭐️ Links How to improve: arxiv.org/abs/2012.07787 Research writing: books.google.co.uk/books/abo…
1
87
6
372
55,304
📢 Call for papers. Submit your paper to the "Gender and Work" workshop that will take place in Barcelona, October 14 and 15, 2024. Confirmed keynotes: @OlleFolke and @Paola_Profeta . More here👇: events.bse.eu/event/13828-wo…
1
64
6
136
48,580
I’ve successfully filed 8 FOIAs and won 3 FOIA lawsuits. The following thread is a guide to filing a FOIA request as a researcher, including templates and real example filings. Please RT! If this thread is helpful, I'll write a Part 2 on filing FOIA lawsuits. 1/10
2
138
10
434
121,554
for an ε-small fee i will attend your talk and make a comment that is δ > 0 different from all the others
3
1
60
10,637
The GOAT pareto improving trade
nobody has won at life more in recent history than the guy who sold wordle to the nytimes for seven figures
1,808
Leontief production function just dropped
For most companies, hiring more people is strictly better. However, this is often not true in AI research. AI research is often bottlenecked by compute, and when this is the case, hiring more researchers can be counter-productive. I remember back at Google Brain, my manager once said we had one headcount and asked who we should hire. I responded that hiring someone will basically be counterproductive and we should try to trade the headcount for TPUs/GPUs instead. For example, if a researcher needs 100 GPUs to do their research and the team is already bottlenecked by compute, there is no point hiring them because everyone else on the team will simply take a hit in productivity in waiting for GPUs. So an interesting hiring consideration is how many GPUs a potential hire will need to do their work. Hiring an extra person could feel like progress but if you don't scale GPUs at the same rate that you scale number of people on the team, the productivity of the team might not improve. This leads to a conclusion that I believe is true but not advertised explicitly: people who are able to do good work with few GPUs can be more hirable/flexible/productive on teams that are compute-bottlenecked, compared to people who only know how to do work if they have 1k GPUs at their disposal. (One caveat though---if the new people you hire will use GPUs *more productively* than the current team, that could be OK since net team productivity will increase, even though productivity per person decreases. Conversely, if the new person you hire needs to use many GPUs and doesn't use them well, then both net team productivity and productivity per person will decrease.)
3
2,371
This is an incredibly cool paper. Really interesting and clear way to think about how to use new technologies in research
1
1
4
3,060
You know those policies that some universities have that admit the top X% of each high school in the state? They're really good for disadvantaged students. They increase graduation rates and annual salaries of disadvantaged students *a lot*. zacharybleemer.com/wp-conten…
16
196
27
815
125,919
What’s a girl gotta do to get a closed form wage equation in this town huh
2
19
8,051
2024 mood 😤
15
561
39
5,199
552,459