Philip Denner

There is a problem with white British men sexually abusing women and children in the UK. But singling out ethnicity is the wrong way to tackle it 👇 What the figures show: - Courts in England and Wales prosecuted 13,842 people for sexual offences in 2024. Where ethnicity was recorded, three in four were white British: 7,487 defendants. - Courts prosecuted 9,215 people for child sexual abuse offences in 2023. Where ethnicity was recorded, 87% were white British. White British people are 75% of the population aged 10 and over. White British people are significantly overrepresented. - Police recorded an ethnicity for 44,396 perpetrators of child sexual abuse in 2024. 37,017 were white British. - 98% of rape victims said the perpetrator was male. Where the rape crimes take place: - 43.2% of victims were raped by a partner or ex-partner. - 37.8% were raped by someone else they knew, such as a date or a friend. - 16.3% were raped by a stranger. - The most common place was the victim's own home (38.2%), followed by the perpetrator's home (28.5%). A park, street or other public space accounted for 8%. We opened this post by singling out white British men. The figures support it, but it is still the wrong place to look. Rape in this country is mostly committed by a man the victim knows, in a home. It is her partner, her ex, her date, her friend. Sorting rapists by ethnicity does nothing for her. It tells her to watch the street when the danger is in her own house, and it lets every man who is not in the group being blamed off the hook. The work that stops rape is in the home: believing women when they report a partner, prosecuting the men they name, and funding the services they turn to. Start with the victim and what happened to her. Every figure, with its source and the full tables: newscord.org/editorials/who-…

🚨 The Telegraph tried to turn the Celebrity Traitors winners’ £83,000 donation to refugees into an antisemitism scandal, and its own article says a senior lawyer investigated the allegation and did not uphold it. That is a smear built on a finding the paper buried in its fourth paragraph. • Its headline first accused Choose Love of being a “hostile environment for Jews”. Those words appear nowhere in the article, and the headline was later changed without a note. • It says Amnesty “admitted it had had to change the internationally recognised definition” of genocide. Amnesty’s report uses the Genocide Convention’s own definition. • It states as “the fact” that Gaza’s death toll includes “tens of thousands of Hamas fighters”, and gives no source. • The evidence it lists against the charity is support for Palestinians, not anything about Jewish people. Sebastian Croft and Romesh Ranganathan gave money to refugees. File an IPSO complaint in under a minute: newscord.org/action/telegrap…