If the literal sense is too thin to carry Christ, how did the apostles draw 3,350 lines from it? Gladd's graphic is a gift to anyone who confesses "not manifold, but one" (WCF/2LBCF 1.9), and an embarrassment to anyone who needs a thin letter to justify supplemental spiritual senses. Every line runs from words to words: an apostle quoting or echoing what was written, and arguing from it to hearers who had no new revelation. "Have you not read…?" Paul "reasoned with them from the Scriptures." The Bereans checked him. So, a dilemma for the quadriga. Either its spiritual sense can be traced along lines like these, or it can't. If it can, it's the literal sense read canonically; by the retrieval's own rule it "simply becomes the literal sense." If it can't, the apostles never did it. And the web itself presupposes one sense. A quotation binds only if what's quoted means one thing. Give each text several senses, and every line splits into many; the web would be noise. It isn't. "The consent of all the parts" (WCF/2LBCF 1.5) is right there on the page.