Michael R. Brown retweeted
A city bus driver in Japan draped a blue cloth over the coin box beside his steering wheel and opened the doors for the morning rush hour.
His union and the bus company's management had reached a bitter deadlock over wages and job security, and the drivers had officially voted to go on strike that morning.
In almost every country on earth, a transit strike means locking the depot gates, shutting down the city, and leaving thousands of ordinary nurses, students, and elderly hospital patients stranded on the curb in the cold.
The Japanese bus drivers decided that punishing innocent neighbors was a dishonorable way to win an argument with their bosses.
So every single driver showed up at dawn in a pressed uniform, inspected their tires, pulled out of the depot right on the minute, and drove every route on schedule, while blocking the fare machine with a blanket so every passenger rode completely free of charge.
Management lost a fortune in fuel and ticket revenue without a single grandmother missing her doctor's appointment or a single kid being late for school.
You know a society has reached a rare level of grace when even a worker's protest is designed to protect the stranger waiting at the bus stop.
🤖 Made with AI
Michael R. Brown retweeted
“There are people running who are running who have the same name in all 50 states.” —- Jaime Raskin
It took us 3 seconds to fact check that. NBC News just didn’t have that kinda time…
Michael R. Brown retweeted
Replying to @SandyofCthulhu
Michael R. Brown retweeted
America didn't just steal the West from Mexico. We reached an agreement for it. Mexico's government was crashing. Their budget was 8 million pesos. Their expenses were 26 million pesos. This was obviously unsustainable.
The US offered to buy the land for what was worth $636 million in today's dollars. We also assumed all U.S. Citizen debts owed by Mexico (worth about $140 million today). Yes, we had defeated Mexico, and could easily have seized the land. BUT WE DIDN'T. We paid for it.
Six years later, Mexico wanted more money, so we made the Gadsden purchase which got us southern Arizona & New Mexico. This was another $350 million in modern value for land no one lived on. Eventually we got Tucson out of it.
So next time some activist tells you we "stole" land from Mexico, here is chapter and verse.
1) The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was legally binding. Mexico signed it.
2) we paid for the land when Mexico needed the income. The purchased land was in fact a major drain on Mexico's finances, and it was a relief to the Mexican government to offload it back then. No doubt there is seller's regret now.
3) it was also paid for in blood.
Michael R. Brown retweeted
Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi after 80 years in Congress 😭
🤖 Made with AI
Michael R. Brown retweeted
I’ve been shitting on Social Security for years now, and every single time, I’m told ad fucking nauseam:
“It’s MY money! I paid into it!”
Really? Then why would we need to raise taxes on everyone else just to give you “your” money?
Because it’s NOT your money. Your money was spent almost as soon as it came in. Today’s workers are paying for yesterday’s retirees.
It’s a massive, government run Ponzi scheme. And now, one of the largest generations in American history is collecting benefits.
In a traditional Ponzi scheme, this is where everything implodes: when there aren’t enough new investors coming in to pay off the old ones.
But there’s one crucial difference.
This one is backed by the federal government.
And when there aren’t enough new people paying into the system, the government has something Bernie Madoff never had:
The power to force the next generation to pay more, at gunpoint.
Exactly like I’ve been saying for years.
Michael R. Brown retweeted
Senate Democrats block Stop Insider Trading Act
notthebee.com/article/senate…
Michael R. Brown retweeted
Robin Hood wasn't re-distributing wealth.
He didn't steal from "the rich". He robbed the king and the king's cronies. These men had previously unjustly confiscated the peasants' property by force. When Robin Hood took those saddlebags of gold, he was returning the people's property.
He wasn't being charitable. He wasn't being socialist. He was rebelling against the state, and the state was well aware of it. That's why they treated him as an insurgency, not just bandits.
Now - consider this. Why are they trying to teach you the story the wrong way?






























