Thank you one and all for 5,000 followers! Particularly to @GallicHotep and @SO3_Clausewitz helping me get over the line. In celebration of what feels like a significant milestone, I thought I’d gather some of my personal favourite bits and B-sides into one thread.
What kind of gotcha is this? If your colleagues are betraying the country then loyalty to the country trumps loyalty to your colleagues.
Some quick wins like these are exactly what we need to make the British economy grow and start making people wealthier. Many of our woes are traced back to an anaemic economy. It needn’t be so. We have so much potential waiting to be unlocked!
Britain is broke. And to fix it, we need to start growing again.
That’s why Reform’s Economic Rescue Plan includes these 64 pro-growth measures I’d take if I were Chancellor:
𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗦𝗲𝗮
1. Approve Rosebank
2. Restart oil and gas licensing
3. Legalise onshore exploration
4. Abolish the Energy Profits Levy
5. Restore maximum economic extraction as the North Sea regulator's objective
𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻
6. Abolish the Emissions Trading Scheme
7. Halt the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
8. Repudiate AR7 contracts for difference and scrap AR8
9. Implement the Fingleton Review on nuclear in full
10. Automatically approve French and South Korean nuclear designs
𝗚𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗛𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀
11. Cut affordable housing requirements on brownfield sites
12. Permitted Development Right for brownfield housing
13. Repeal Biodiversity Net Gain
14. Exit the Aarhus Convention
15. Repeal and reform the Habitats Regulations, including Nutrient Neutrality
16. End the boiler ban
17. Legalise air conditioning to meet overheating rules
18. Remove mandatory EPC improvements
19. Revoke the Future Homes Standard
20. Repeal the Renters' Rights Act
𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲
21. Legislate approval for new runways at Heathrow and Gatwick
22. Auction airport landing slots
23. End 'target-consistent' carbon pricing in project evaluation
24. Ban carbon emissions considerations in planning applications
25. Fast-track all water reservoirs as nationally significant projects
26. Make Development Consent Orders a true one-stop shop
27. Restrict judicial review of ministerial planning decisions
28. Scrap Net Zero construction rules
29. Scrap the social value test in procurement
30. Lift launch limits at SaxaVord Spaceport
31. Open completed sections of East-West Rail
𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
32. Review regulatory barriers to AI adoption
33. Permit on-site gas generation for data centres and industry
𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗛𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿𝘀
34. Cut Employer NI back to 13.8%
35. Introduce a migrant worker levy
36. Repeal the Employment Rights Act
37. Clarify that workplace rights don't require mandatory training courses
38. Let experienced tradesmen work on government contracts without CSCS qualifications
𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆
39. Review bank capital requirements to boost lending
40. Rule out Net Zero in financial regulators' remits
41. Repeal climate-related financial disclosure rules
𝗚𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗠𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴
42. Scrap airport 'surface access strategies'
43. Abolish the electric vehicle mandates
44. Apply domestic GB hours to all UK HGV trips
45. Ban Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods
46. Back the M4 Relief Road
47. Move a new car's first MOT to four years
48. Abolish the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation
𝗨𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺𝘀
49. Replace GDPR with a New Zealand-style Privacy Act
50. Fully re-legalise Imperial units
51. Review all unchanged EU law
52. Automatically repeal remaining EU law in 5 years unless retained
𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀
53. Make quarterly Making Tax Digital reporting voluntary
54. Reduce legal obligations on SME Non-Executive Directors
55. Double permission-free event days from 28 to 56
56. Make pavement dining licences automatic and permanent
57. Let shops open until 10pm, except Sundays
58. Repeal board diversity and inclusion rules
59. Remove the Sustainable Aviation Fuel mandate
60. Abolish the packaging tax
61. Scrap BBC and Channel 4 priority on streaming platforms
62. Remove the Public Sector Equality Duty
63. Five-year sunset on all QUANGOs
64. Five-year sunset clause on all new regulations
And there are more to come!
Britain’s full potential is waiting to be unleashed 🚀
New paper out! Education is an often neglected aspect of government policy, but it should not be so. The effects are long-reaching and have profound consequences down the line. Please do read.
Pleased to release our latest report by our very own @ZickZaggurat on the drive to lower suspensions in English schools. Whitehall’s target of pre-pandemic suspension levels is not only fanciful, but the data show that there is hardly any correlation between reduced suspension rates and better attainment. Link to full paper below.
Jardine Matheson Internationalist retweeted
Pleased to release our latest report by our very own @ZickZaggurat on the drive to lower suspensions in English schools. Whitehall’s target of pre-pandemic suspension levels is not only fanciful, but the data show that there is hardly any correlation between reduced suspension rates and better attainment. Link to full paper below.
With friends like these who needs enemies?
Germany and France offer to build submarines for Argentina as threat to the Falkland Islands rises trib.al/hGTzrVS
Jardine Matheson Internationalist retweeted
Would LOVE to hear from rejoiners on this. The bloc never valued our participation when we were in & now we are out are friends of questionable worth - particularly on defence, despite our leadership in 🇺🇦.
Brexit was & remains the correct decision for our national interest.
Germany and France offer to build submarines for Argentina as threat to the Falkland Islands rises trib.al/hGTzrVS
HMRC has quietly sent hundreds of letters to wealthy people asking them to reveal what they own. Not what they earn or what tax they've paid, but what they own.
Here's what's going on. A unit called the Wealthy Team covers anyone with "incomes of £200,000 or more, or assets equal to or above £2m in any of the last three years". That's about 850,000 people. The letters ask for a meeting to discuss "sources of wealth", "future intentions", trusts, companies, family arrangements and even "significant life events" you expect in the coming years.
It is presented as voluntary, but there's a nudge: "We may still need to carry out compliance checks on your tax returns. However, speaking with you first may help avoid this."
Until now, inspectors have usually only asked about income and earnings. Experts call this a "sea change". One lawyer asked the obvious question: "does HMRC have a right to know what someone owns and not simply that they have paid the right amount of tax?" A tax adviser said: "No other G20 country asks for this level of detail from its taxpayers about what they own."
So what is it for? Advisers suspect it is groundwork for an exit tax, a charge on your wealth for leaving the country. As one put it: "Building that knowledge could indeed be part of moving towards an exit tax."
You don't have to be a billionaire to see the problem.
They are going to lock in one of the worst waves of immigration this country has ever received. Time and time again every estimate of this cohort, particularly care workers, shows they are a lifetime fiscal drain to the taxpayer. They want to ensure this is permanent.
Angela Rayner hints the government's plan to require migrants to wait up to 15 years to qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain will be watered down, telling @SkyNews the final scheme will 'recognise the contribution that people make who come to this country'
Tim Martin is a hero and in a just world would be given an Earldom for his services to competitive markets. There should be a Wetherspoons in every airport!
I have spent an inordinate amount of time in various Spoons this weekend owing to the awful weather and our awful public transport system. So while I wait for my Korean friend chicken burger here’s some of the under explored reasons why Spoons is so great:
1. They have real Heinz ketchup (ditto Heinz mustard, HP sauce etc). This is impressive when most food trucks and even restaurants etc now use cheaper supermarket-brand versions as Heinz has become so pricey
2. The southern fried chicken strips are better than the chicken selects in McDonald’s (and that’s a high bar)
3. The staff are nice (I’ve always found)
4. The spice bag is elite
5. There’s something for everyone - even Aperol Spritz! (£4.75)
6. The free re-fills on the coffee
7. Often they’re in great heritage buildings
8. The explicit invite on the pump to try before you choose. This is great
Many more but my burger has now arrived
This is not how commodity extractors work at all. They are price takers not price makers. This is basic commodities 101. Shocking that an alleged economist believes this stuff.
Nope, that’s not how taxes and price works. The price is determined by demand and supply.
Companies charge the highest price they can given demand. A tax levied on *profits* does not affect a company’s cost ie supply.
Taxes on *windfall* profits (like oil and gas) are the most efficient kind of tax there is.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Corporate profit taxes do not directly shift marginal costs but empirical studies show partial pass-through into higher consumer prices. Windfall taxes on oil and gas have deterred investment and production in practice despite theoretical efficiency on rents.
dadun.unav.edu/server/api/cor…
ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps…
taxfoundation.org/blog/big-oil-p…
scottishfinancialreview.com/2025/09/03/win…
The optics here beggars belief. We are now being told by our political class that we should prepare for the unthinkable because of deliberate choices they’ve made which have destabilised our energy grid, hollowed out our defence, and surrendered the streets to criminals.
Jardine Matheson Internationalist retweeted
This Monday, @BylineTimes posted an article about us with the misleading headline “Mysterious Right-Wing Think Tank Demanding Charity Transparency
Won't Say Who Runs or
Funds It.” We very explicitly responded to their reporter’s Right of Reply with the factually correct statement that we do not disclose any funders because we have none.
We wrote to them requesting the headline be changed and a correction publicised. Unfortunately they have not responded. We urge Byline to correct their false headline with immediate effect and publicise said correction, lest we are forced to escalate the complaint to their regulator, Impress.
The Cambridge Circus Research Team
Why should we agree to this? Total nonstarter.
No surrender.
In his new book, @JohnDoyleDCU argues Britain would continue paying Northern Ireland's £5.7 billion state and unfunded public sector pension bills to a united Ireland, because not doing so would be unpopular with unions and the public in Britain.
The grid is under strain, the police have lost confidence of the public, prisoners are being released early, the military is in a dire state, taxes are at sky high levels, government finances are on a cliff edge, and this is what the Mayor of Britain thinks is worth his time.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham is going to be taking part in Celebrity #Gogglebox, this Friday.
Think about how much effort is being put into frustrating a legitimate political party. They’ve essentially instituted blanket surveillance, emotionally deceived veterans, potentially interfered with campaigning material (and therefore broken electoral law). No other party has ever faced this kind of opposition.
That’s before we get to the fact that the incumbent government are seeking to retrospectively strip them of lawful donations they’ve received.
How is this legitimate or democratic? A political party is basically being treated like an organised crime gang or a terrorist cell. If this were happening in a foreign country the press would be reporting on the dangers that free and fair elections were at risk.
Having exhausted their attempts to win the argument, they are mobilising every dirty trick in the book to stop a completely normal political party from winning an election. They’ve lost the debate.
Just remember that while it may be happening to people you don’t like now, it could be you next.
When Reform's letters to postal voters in Portsmouth were ready to go out, two undercover ITV reporters were personally responsible for almost two hundred of them in the ward of Drayton and Farlington.
Reform lost Drayton and Farlington by 24 votes.
The same two men were responsible for delivering leaflets to half the ward of Baffins.
Reform lost Baffins by 85 votes.
These were men whose purpose was to infiltrate Reform UK and damage it.
In two wards decided by a few dozen votes, we believe there are reasonable grounds to conclude that ITV altered the result of British elections.
There is no precedent for this.
It is certainly not journalism.
We believe it to be criminal.
We will hold ITV and its activists to account.
Journalists truly do believe they are members of some priestly class who have special status and therefore the rules don’t apply to them. You’re actually NOT allowed to commit crimes as part of an investigation!
You are not special! You have no special privileges!
Why are unions advocating positions that harm their members and depress wages? What is the agenda?
It seems like every week we have revelations of new ways the state is on the verge of collapse. We have been very lucky that nothing has happened yet. But we have the grid strained, prisons failing, militarily unable to train, police losing capability and authority.
There’s a very good chance of things spiralling out of control. It’s not unimaginable that an extended blackout leads to riots that are too spread out and sustained such that the state is incapable of dealing with them.
That’s just one scenario. There’s lots that can go wrong. So many pressure points. The sad thing is all of this was completely avoidable. It didn’t have to be this way. We let the state become extremely large but also very brittle. We can’t afford to have a wake up call when something goes wrong. Leaders need to act to fix these issues or else the consequences could be unfathomable.
Is anyone in leadership positions even thinking about this?


























