uxnemesis111 retweeted
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
Total remigration is going to look extreme, but I don't care. They brought this on themselves and millions will go.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
日本がバングラデシュから10万人受け入れるとのニュースが世界中に拡散され、海外アカウントから「日本は欧州の二の舞になる」「国家的自殺だ」と散々言われていて将来への恐怖を感じた。。
経緯はこうだ。
育成就労の協力覚書を結び、その後すぐにバングラデシュ首相が来日して高市首相と会談。
出てきたのは「日本からバングラデシュへの投資1兆円」や巡視船供与を約束したとのニュースだった。
これだけでもあり得ないのだが、
覚書の共同声明に受け入れ人数の発表は無かったのにも関わらず、海外には移民10万人受け入れのニュースだけが強調されて拡散されたのだ。
実際、バングラデシュ側は「年10万人」を目標に掲げ、民間レベルでも「5年で10万人」を進めていることは事実であるため、それを伝えたニュースサイトのリプ欄には海外アカウントから大量の警告リプが付く形となった。
その内容を見ると、皆、口を揃えて、「欧州のようになるから、バングラデシュからの移民受け入れをやめろ」というものばかりだったのが衝撃だった。
欧州の失敗を実際に見てきた海外アカウントからの警告はとても重要だと思うのだが、日本政府はどうせ無視して受け入れまくるのが目に見えてしまうことが悲しいし恐ろしすぎる…😭😱
uxnemesis111 retweeted
The deliberate White demographic replacement (genocide) is becoming more obvious by the day. What used to be controversial takes are now ordinary conversations. The entire problem can be resolved relatively quickly by restoring freedom of association for White people. Thomas Sewell has been leading the way.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
Crosslink decides whether Zcash evolves or remains a doomed meme coin like BTC!
ZEC will die if it fails to adopt PoS: ZEC is insecure, slow & centralized under PoW now
Help us save ZEC from the cult!
As the "encrypted Bitcoin" narrative now stands in the way of progress: 🧵
If we want ZEC to become the hardest private money, then we must embrace technological progress!
In ZEC's current state, that is far from being the case. On top of that, the decision-making proccess is totally centralized today!
Some people want to fix this & there are others who oppose such progress. This is the story of ZEC's greatest obstacle: A conflict is brewing that will decide the fate of crypto's biggest privacy coin; beware:
Evolve or Die:
That is the fundamental divide this debate represents, one that has played out over BTC before. A different story of how progress lost, history does not need to repeat itself here!
We now have the opportunity to do things differently, to fulfill Satoshi's vision for a true cypherpunk P2P Cash. Instead of merely pretending on a network that cannot possibly make that dream a reality
If we want ZEC to be the best possible version of itself, then ofcourse it should adopt the best technologies!
Especially when they represent leaps & bounds in genuine progress without any significant trade-offs!
To oppose such clear & objective improvements does not strike me as entirely rational; there is a degree of religiosity involved, much as is the case around BTC too
The Bitcoin Cult:
Most Bitcoiners believe that BTC is the most secure, decentralized & economically sound network
When that, in reality, is incredibly far from the truth, by several orders of magnitude now!
BTC's security is collapsing (already much lower cost to attack than all major PoS chains today)
This will lead to increasing the inflation rate beyond the "sacred" 21M limit; that will lead to forks & even a potential death spiral with a "bank run" & all. It is an absolute disaster & the crisis will hit within a decade
Look, we covered this extensively elsewhere & it is 2026; ask Grok to pull up some of my other articles on this if you want to know more. This can all be proven without a shadow of doubt. That is not the point of this article
My point is that BTC is some kind of mass delusion, of the type we have seen before in the 2008 housing crisis, the dot-com bubble & even the Tulip bubble! It has happened before & it is happening again with BTC today
So it is no wonder that some of that religiosity/mentality "infects" the communities of other chains, such as ZEC. Especially considering that it now has this "encrypted bitcoin" narrative going for it, or, as I argue, against it
BTC's current "success" as a purely speculative meme coin has done incredible harm to our industry by inspiring other projects to follow a similar path, not realizing that it is, in fact, a dead end
Its temporary "success" as a meme coin only predicts more future harm as it inevitably comes crashing down. Unfortunately for ZEC, it shares the exact same design & therefore inherits all of these same fatal flaws
Conflicts of Interest:
Many of the major detractors of Crosslink have conflicts of interest, such as large ownership stakes in ZEC mining companies, which would directly benefit from continuing to bleed ZEC dry today
Miners also have notoriously strong short- to medium-term incentives, with barely any long-term incentives! In this case, miners are also directly incentivized to oppose any switch to PoS!
I should also disclose my conflicts of interest for fairness. The fund I founded, own & help manage is also invested in ZEC, the token. I would call that aligned! Unlike miners, I am nonetheless under a fiduciary duty to report that!
Who Decides:
The truth is ugly, as ZEC is currently under effective centralized control. While the detractors of Crosslink mostly support that form of governance, as it mirrors the monolithic position of the Bitcoin cult
My position is that the only fair way to decide this would be through a stakeholder vote. However, the infrastructure, culture & incentives are not in place, making it unlikely to succeed at scale. That makes this all a serious governance dilemma
Ideally, the owners of the chain should decide ZEC's fate & should always be able to (stakeholders). Putting that on miners has never worked before in the past & putting that responsibility on a development team is a recipe for disaster:
Power Corrupts:
Power corrupts & absolute power corrupts absolutely. @zooko has done enough for this industry for us to expect him to start playing politics now. Make no mistake, this is old-school ugly real-world politics
Exactly because there is no decentralized dispute mechanism. That is why we need decentralized decision-making processes & this can only be achieved through stakeholder governance. At least to the extent it is possible to do justice to the underlying decentralization of the chain
Chicken & Egg Problem:
However, it might also be a chicken-and-egg problem, because without PoS incentives, the outcome of such a vote might be seen as illegitimate if it does not garner sufficient participation
So, the centralized controllers of ZEC might just have to use their very real authoritarian powers to push ZEC one last time over the finish line before they can relinquish their own centralized control, swapping it for "soft power" instead. It would at least be the best possible poetic final act from that position of control
That is also why a hybrid approach might make more sense politically/diplomaticaly even if it does not make any sense technically
Good Governance:
The goal should be to avoid a split, even when it starts to look increasingly inevitable
That is what happens when there is no formalized dispute mechanism like stakeholder voting; when the disagreement is big enough, it leads to a split. Unlike stakeholder governance. There is a reason for that:
In a democracy, there is no civil war after every vote, because people agree with the decision-making process even if they do not agree with the outcome. This is still a good analogy, despite the fact that an equity is closer to how crypto governance should work in general
The real problem here is governance, as it also was for Bitcoin's "block size" debates. Ultimately, that will determine the outcome of this entire debate
Crosslink:
In my view, Crosslink does not go far enough. Hybrid consensus is not worth it, as it inherits the cons of both systems. It is an improvement over pure PoW, sure. But it is still nowhere near as effective as a pure PoS design
That is why I would rather see a full switch to PoS, while giving the mining industry several years' notice to phase out their operations responsibly
But as I mentioned earlier, my technical ideal can be superseded by the political realities, no matter how frustrated that might make me. At least it also exposes the costs of having bad governance
This debate is about radically different visions for blockchain colliding with each other
This is not about Crosslink's implementation details at all. As we are debating some of the greatest & most critical ideological divides crypto has ever had to tackle
Conclusion:
Whatever decision ZEC's centralized governance makes, it will make some factions & groups of people very upset; there is no other way around this
Will this lead to a "ZEC classic"? Maybe; it all depends on how everyone plays their cards. Also, which side even gets to keep the original name is a totally arbitrary & dirty political game!
So, I advocate for just doing the right thing. Do what is truly best for ZEC, not just what the fantasy narrative dictates. Go full PoS, transition using hybrid if needed. That is where Crosslink is a decent plan
After that, there can be several years of preparing the community, culture & incentives for the full switch to PoS. Along with the switch to full stakeholder governance!
That would be my dream for ZEC. Unlocking the decision-making processes that will also enable it to improve in other ways in the future. As my wish list is very large & ZEC can do very little in comparison today
This is a story of conservatism & orthodoxy against progressivism. This time, the truth seekers (progressives) are on the right side of history: ZEC must evolve, or it will most surely die
Fortunately, we have a decent chance of pulling it off this time. So, for what it is worth, throw your hat into the race. Start by helping to spread this message far & wide!
If ZEC manages to walk through this door & embrace progress & truth. Then ZEC most certainly deserves a place in the hallowed halls of the future of finance & money! 🔥
uxnemesis111 retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just put a bounty on fraud, and every American can cash in.
He announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program today. You report fraud at fraud.gov, and if it's real, you get paid. Trump's words: "If you find a billion dollars, we are giving a commission to that person of 1%."
Find 10 billion, and that's 100 million in your pocket.
California's answer was reportedly a law to shut down Nick Shirley. Trump's answer is to deputize the whole country.
The fraudsters spent years robbing us blind. Now 330 million Americans are watching, and every one of them has a reason to turn them in.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
In order to "stop this madness" you will need a level of brutality that is at least 1000 times the execution of Nidal Hasan that you told the media you wouldn't watch
Words are cheap and when your resolve was tested, you capitulated to "people" who fantasize about killing you
uxnemesis111 retweeted
What if someone gets to your Keystone 3 Pro before you do? 👀
You’ve asked us this a lot, so we put it on camera 💥
Watch to the end and share it with anyone who’s asked you the same thing 🫡
uxnemesis111 retweeted
Taylor says she traced the $100M in laundered funds through gas transfers, not by breaking Zcash’s privacy
"Everyone was like, oh my god. They traced through Zcash. It's not private anymore. Guys, I did not trace through Zcash."
"They crossed their inputs and their outputs. Meaning that they have money over here that's going into Tornado and also into Zcash. Then they have money out over here that's coming out of Tornado and also out of Zcash."
"Ideally, when you're laundering, money goes in one end and it comes out the other and you force everyone to properly follow you through. However, when you have, like, thousands of addresses, you have gas, you're funding. You get confused easily."
"If you're moving fast, you're trying to launder the money, about $100M to get through. Gas will fuck you up every time, kids."
"They come out in USDT because that's what has the most liquidity. But then they're very rapidly trying to get out of USDT because they can get frozen. And so then they send gas from over here to over here."
"That is how I traced the Zcash. You just follow this little trail over here. Everyone else is, like, brute forcing it through the pools or whatever."
"Zcash, still sufficiently private. Unless you're laundering $100M incredibly rapidly and stupid."
The Ledger Drain, OpenAI Espionage and Models That May Self-Replicate teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/1qxvveyDn…
uxnemesis111 retweeted
“They can't trace Monero, bullshit.” Let's be clear:
Zcash leaks at its own edge. When coins go into or out of the shielded pool, the amount shows on Zcash’s own chain. Monero has no edge like that. Every amount is hidden (RingCT), every receiver gets a one-time address, and every spend sits among decoys. You can’t follow coins across Monero’s ledger.
But a thief doesn’t live inside Monero. They have to get in and get out, and the doors are often public.
A hypothetical scenario, using XMR1 on Hyperliquid:
- The thief swaps stolen USDC into XMR1. Hyperliquid is a public chain, so the wallet, size and time are all on the record.
- They withdraw to native XMR through the bridge in 9 lots of ~210, one about every 40 minutes. The withdrawals are public. Nobody sees what happens inside Monero after that.
- Two days later, 9 deposits of ~209.9 XMR come back through the bridge and mint XMR1 to a fresh wallet. Same count, same sizes less fees, same 40-minute rhythm. Or the same shape turns up somewhere else, as BTC out of a swap desk worth the same at that hour.
All we can do is match the way in to the way out. But that leaves plenty to go on: how many lots, how big, when, and many more markers that people don't realise.
That’s not a weakness in Monero. Monero does its job.
Almost everything leaves a trace. Walk through a room and you leave a scent. You can’t see it, but the right sensor picks it up. On-chain it’s the same: the trail is always there, you just need the right instrument to see it.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
Japan is the only "First world" country remaining.
The rest are destroyed by Diversity.
We must protect at all cost🇯🇵🌃
uxnemesis111 retweeted
🇯🇵 Japanese people every right to survive.
We do not need to learn about or interact with incompatible cultures.
We need to keep our country the way it already is. To conserve our traditional and heritage until the end of time.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
This country has declared war against White Americans. There is a White genocide that is happening in this country.
Any Republican who has the gall to ask you for your vote. Ask them: Is the great replacement of Americans real?
My answer would be yes. And it must be stopped.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
If you own crypto, this is genuinely scary.
A top bitcoin researcher, who actively works at the Ethereum foundation, is telling us to move our crypto to a bunker.
He thinks there is now a reasonable possibility that superhuman AI discovers a way to break the cryptography securing Bitcoin and Ethereum before quantum computers do.
That sounds insane, but there’s some important context.
Bitcoin and Ethereum rely heavily on ECDSA. At a very basic level, your wallet has a private key, and mathematics allows you to derive a public key from it.
Going forward is easy.
Going backward and figuring out the private key from the public information is considered effectively impossible.
A huge amount of crypto security rests on that assumption.
Drake is worried that AI could discover some completely new mathematical shortcut that changes it.
Why is he worried about this now?
AI has made some pretty ridiculous advances in mathematics this year.
Earlier this year, an OpenAI model autonomously disproved a famous Erdős conjecture dating back around 80 years, using mathematical techniques researchers hadn’t expected.
Then, literally the day before Drake made this post, OpenAI released hundreds of AI-generated mathematical results across hundreds of problem families.
One of those results broke through a longstanding assumption involving the complexity of integer multiplication.
That does NOT mean AI broke ECDSA.
It didn’t.
The signal is that AI is increasingly demonstrating an ability to find novel approaches to mathematical problems humans have studied for decades.
At the same time, researchers have been making progress on the other threat: quantum computers.
Estimates for the resources required to attack elliptic-curve cryptography have fallen significantly, and researchers, including Drake himself, have been working on making those attacks more efficient.
So his concern is basically:
What if everyone is preparing for quantum computers to eventually break ECDSA, but superhuman AI discovers a mathematical shortcut first?
That’s the part he thinks the crypto industry isn't sufficiently prepared for.
If ECDSA were efficiently broken, the consequences could obviously be catastrophic. Depending on the attack and what information an address has exposed, an attacker could potentially recover private keys and steal funds.
Drake isn't saying this has happened.
He isn't even saying it's definitely going to happen.
He's saying that recent AI progress has moved the probability from something he could comfortably ignore to something worth preparing for.
His recommendation is surprisingly simple.
If you're a major holder, exchange, custodian, ETF, treasury, etc., consider moving assets from heavily used addresses into fresh addresses that have never signed a transaction.
Then don't use those addresses.
That limits the cryptographic information you've exposed and potentially buys you additional protection if a vulnerability is suddenly discovered.
For the really large players, he thinks the industry should begin preparing to move beyond ECDSA entirely and toward post-quantum / hash-based cryptography.
The downside is enormous, the precautions are relatively cheap, and AI progress is moving fast enough that waiting until an attack exists may be too late.
He thinks it's now reasonable to consider the possibility that ECDSA could break before AGI/Q-Day, potentially on a timeline of months rather than years.
Nothing publicly known can currently do this.
But his argument is essentially:
For decades we've protected trillions of dollars with mathematical problems because humans couldn't figure out how to solve them efficiently.
We're now building machines that may become much better at mathematics than humans.
Maybe it's time to stop assuming those two facts can coexist forever.
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
uxnemesis111 retweeted
I’m afraid that the “Remigration” bros are going to have to realise that the mass removal of people will, naturally, have to encompass a lot of violence. At the end of the day, this only goes one of two ways:
1. Violence
2. White people go extinct
uxnemesis111 retweeted
🚨 WHY HOLD BITCOIN INSTEAD OF ZCASH?
@cryptomanran questions Bitcoin’s long term advantage over Zcash’s optional privacy.
Ran: “Is there any reason why you'd hold Bitcoin, not Zcash?”
@ZeMariaMacedo : “Music to my ears. I agree with you.”
uxnemesis111 retweeted
The thing you have to remember is that civilisations die. Ethnic groups die out, including in Europe. Entire histories, cultures and dynasties are wiped out. That is simply how history works.
Yet people today have this bizarre assumption that theirs will somehow survive indefinitely, even in the face of mass Third World immigration. Sorry, folks, but the world doesn’t work like that.