Pinned Tweet
𧡠Three projects currently on my radar π
π― @ehoney_eth
Turning AI compute into an on-chain game.
Mine matrix math β earn ETH β mint unique moth specimens.
One of the more creative experiments I've seen lately.
π @triangle3_eth
On-chain indexes for crypto sectors.
Launch a basket, build a narrative, earn when volume flows through it.
π°οΈ @atlas4_eth
Still digging deeper here, but seeing some interesting builders paying attention to it.
The common theme:
Ethereum-native.
New mechanics.
Worth watching. ποΈ
DYOR.
π€ Made with AI
π¨ NEW PROJECTS ALERT π¨
@interlatent - Physical AI & RL infrastructure π€β‘
@pepe4art - Pepe art ecosystem & meme IP πΈπ¨
@MNX_fi - DeFi yield optimization π°π
A few early-stage projects worth keeping on your radar π
π¨While Polymarket is busy redefining words after markets resolve, a new generation of prediction markets is being built.
Markets should be governed by clear rules, transparent resolution processes, and accountability β not by retroactive interpretations that undermine user trust.
That's why I'm paying close attention to @sunseamarkets.
Prediction markets only work when participants can trust that the written rules mean what they say. The industry deserves better standards than what we've seen in the MicroStrategy market dispute.
Competition is coming.
π¨ UPDATE π¨
Official Statement on the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market
I have formally served a legal demand letter - prepared together with legal advisors and counsel - on Adventure One QSS Inc., doing business as Polymarket, the Panama-incorporated entity publicly associated with Polymarket's international platform. This matter will be pursued under applicable Panamanian law and any other relevant jurisdictions.
The written rule said "sells." It did not say "discloses."
I will keep pursuing every lawful avenue available until this market receives a fair review.
IN PROGRESS:
I have also formally filed a complaint with the CFTC regarding the disputed market, "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?"
The rule said "sells," not "discloses." This dispute now warrants regulatory scrutiny, proper documentation, and an impartial review. I will continue preserving evidence and exhausting every lawful path open to me.
An open message to Polymarket, its CEO, and its institutional backers.
Polymarket already carries enough regulatory baggage. Don't add to it. The CFTC has previously ordered Polymarket to pay $1.4 million and to cease violating its rules. Reuters later reported that the FBI raided Shayne Coplan's home in connection with a DOJ investigation.
Now traders are asking one straightforward question: where in the written rule did it say MicroStrategy's Bitcoin sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31? Nowhere. I bought 49,695.76 YES shares because the written rule resolved YES if MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31 β not "publicly disclosed by May 31."
If a platform can bolt on an unwritten disclosure requirement after the result is known, then no prediction market is safe. This has stopped being about one trader or one market. It is about market integrity, consumer protection, and whether institutional investors are willing to tolerate rules being reinterpreted after the outcome.
I am preserving all evidence for journalists, lawyers, regulators, and other affected traders. If Polymarket chooses to disregard its own written rule, I am prepared to commit every resource I lawfully can, for as long as it takes. This will not quietly go away.
I am ready for a long legal, regulatory, and public-accountability process if that is what defending affected traders requires.
Do the right thing.
Resolve by the written rule.
Rule before trade.
Official Statement on the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market
Regarding the Polymarket market "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?", I've consulted several legal advisors, partners, and others experienced in crypto and prediction-market disputes.
Let me be clear about one thing: I knew I was taking a risk. My position was aggressive, and perhaps I was greedy. But taking a risk doesn't change the facts β and it doesn't give a platform license to enforce a vague or unwritten rule after real money is already on the line.
The written rule stated that the market resolves YES if MicroStrategy sells any of its Bitcoin by the date in the title. It never said the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31, filed in an 8-K by May 31, or confirmed before the deadline. The date of a sale and the date it is disclosed are two different things.
If Polymarket intended this to be a disclosure-based market, the rule should have said so plainly. The average user reads "sells any Bitcoin by May 31" as an event-based condition β not a question of when that event is made public. Whatever ambiguity exists was created by the wording of the market itself.
I bought 49,695.76 YES shares for roughly 35,000 USDC. That is real money, and it deserves a serious review. I will keep strengthening my legal documentation, gathering evidence, and engaging the right legal support. I intend to see this through to the end using every lawful channel available to me.
I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking that the written rules be honored, that the facts be confronted directly, and that this market be reviewed fairly.
Prediction markets only function when people can trust that words mean what they say.
@Polymarket @PolymarketHelp
Can someone explain this Polymarket anomaly?
World Cup favorites:
β’ France: $32M volume
β’ Spain: $26M
β’ England: $21M
Yet teams with virtually no chance of winning have higher volume:
β’ Jordan: $30M
⒠Curaçao: $40M
β’ Uzbekistan: $47M
In total, teams with <1% implied odds account for roughly $525M in volume β around 40% of the entire market.
Is this just incentive farming?
Or is there something interesting happening under the hood?
Closed beta: 54/100 spots claimed
46 seats remaining before registration closes.
π @horizon_trade_x
