𝟏°⚡𝑷𝑹𝑬𝑵𝑺𝑨 💎⚖️✍️ *ᶜᵗᵃ.ᵒᶠᶦᶜᶦᵃˡ

😂 A @jMilei lo graduaron en economía sin haber concluido la secundaria y encima no aprendió a sumar, sólo a restar: le prohíben en las escuelas judías usar el signo más ➕️ ya que hace referencia a la crucifixión de Jesús y el javo es un blasfemo anticatólico: @Pontifex_es ✝️

Antisemitas y pro terrorismo me denunciaron masivamente la cuenta y la tengo shadowbaneada (invisibilizada). Ayúdenme con RT y sugiriendo que me sigan, para romper esas restricciones. Gracias a todos !!!

🚨 ULTIMATUM NUCLEAR: LA ESCALADA DEL CONFLICTO 🚨

☢️🇺🇸🇮🇷 WHY IS IRAN’S UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR FORTRESS RAISING THE SPECTRE OF A US NUCLEAR STRIKE? The answer may lie beneath 100 metres of solid rock. Following Tucker Carlson’s warning that President Donald Trump could be days away from launching a nuclear strike against Iran under pressure from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, attention has turned to Pickaxe Mountain, a heavily fortified underground complex near Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility. 🔴 THE MILITARY DILEMMA: CAN AMERICA’S MOST POWERFUL BOMBS PENETRATE IRAN’S DEFENCES? Iran has been developing an extensive network of underground tunnels and facilities beneath Pickaxe Mountain. Some estimates suggest parts of the complex could lie 80–100 metres below the surface, although its precise depth remains unverified. The US possesses the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), its most powerful conventional bunker-buster, weighing approximately 13.6 tonnes and reportedly capable of penetrating around 60 metres of certain materials under specific conditions. However, the density and composition of the surrounding rock, combined with the facility’s depth and structural design, could significantly limit the weapon’s effectiveness. Even a successful strike might collapse tunnel entrances and disrupt operations without destroying critical infrastructure buried deep inside the mountain. In other words, hitting the facility is one thing. Destroying what lies beneath it is another. ☢️ WHY IS THE NUCLEAR OPTION BEING DISCUSSED? Unlike conventional bunker-busters, nuclear weapons release enormous amounts of energy, generating powerful shock waves capable of travelling through surrounding rock and potentially causing extensive structural damage to deeply buried facilities. This provides a technical explanation for why nuclear weapons might enter discussions about striking exceptionally hardened underground targets. However, greater destructive power does not guarantee success, particularly when the facility’s internal layout, depth and structural resilience remain uncertain. 🔴 THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES: AN ESCALATION THAT COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING A US nuclear strike against Iran would mark the first use of nuclear weapons in warfare since 1945, potentially triggering major regional escalation, dangerous radioactive contamination and an unprecedented international crisis. Despite Carlson’s warning, there is no independently verified public evidence that Washington has authorised or is preparing such an attack. 📌 BOTTOM LINE Iran’s deeply buried fortifications present Washington with a formidable military challenge, as even the most powerful conventional weapons may struggle to guarantee the destruction of infrastructure concealed beneath the mountain. The US may possess the firepower to strike Iran’s underground nuclear fortress. But the real question is whether it can destroy what lies beneath it — without crossing the nuclear threshold.