FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend) header
FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend) profile picture

A casual trying to be better AND getting there. | 2 x top55k | 23/24: 105k

Joined July 2011
Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)Photo by FPL Weekend Warrior (@fplWeekend)
Tavernier, Gross & Silva all have 4YC🫠🫠
157
This new Spurs striker JPVH sure seems wasteful
1
36
This new Spurs striker JPVH sure seems wasteful
1
77
Need to save some transfers!!! I’ve got: 4YC - Gross 3YC - Silva, DeCuyper, Rogers, Tavernier, DCL Surely I will be fucked at some point…
136
GW9🔒 ♻️: Pedro, Sangare & Thiaw ➡️ Jackson, Tavernier & Silva (3/3) 🧢: Jackson OR: Irrelevant at this point… Have transferred in two w/3yellows. Have a total of five😅😅. I’m screwed😅😅Thunderbastards FC
1
7
417
He was of course referring to the star CB couple Botman & Thiaw😅
195
GW7🔒 ♻️: Wissa ➡️ DCL (2FT) 🧢: Haaland Wissa gone feels good
1
162
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
Hot take The template WC3 backline (NOR Calafiori Hall De Cuyper Konsa) is fragile and a potential disaster waiting to happen. No defcons and all varying degrees of mins/injury risks. Reeks of favouring short term picks purely because that strategy has worked out so far
25
7
4
191
51,831
GW2🔒 ♻️: Save 🧢: Bruno Palestra injury a bummer. Starting him in case of why not
202
GW1🔒 BB1 Active Midfielders and attackers been pretty nailed. In the end: O’reilly, Shaw & Rodon vs Palestra, Maguire & Ballard🤷🏻‍♂️
1
107
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
In the latest of our data dives in partnership with @SolioAnalytics, we assess how seven of this summer’s most intriguing arrivals are expected to translate their previous performances into Fantasy Premier League points in 2026-27. theanalyst.com/articles/fpl-…
19
6
85
97,899
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
I re-calculated every FPL bonus point from 2025/26 under the new 2026/27 BPS rules. All 380 fixtures re-calculated; the bonus re-ranked in each. The 4 changes: CBI now 1 per 3 (was per 2), 'being tackled' -1 removed, pen save 8 to 7, +1 per big-chance save. Thread 🧵👇
32
37
7
386
104,794
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
Thankgod Argentina didn't complain LMAO Rice could have been sent off 3 times lolll 😂 Rice didn't knew this stupid rule or what? Such a trash dumb rule that too 😭
410
4,387
663
59,233
3,750,913
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
Norway deserved this semi more than us. FA are a fucking joke allowing this again.
582
1,214
114
36,231
1,750,537
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
🚨Ole Gunnar Solskjær on Norway’s disallowed goal against England after Torbjørn Heggem’s finish: 🗣️ “Norway have been cheated. I don’t say that lightly, but I genuinely don’t understand how that goal has been disallowed. I watched the replay several times, and I don’t see enough contact from Erling Haaland on Anderson to justify cancelling the goal. Football is a physical game. Players are allowed to compete for position. If we’re going to disallow goals for every slight touch, then we’ll be ruling out goals every weekend. Haaland didn’t push him with excessive force, he didn’t pull him back and he certainly didn’t do enough to make Anderson fall the way he did. For me, Anderson goes down far too easily, and the referee has rewarded it. The most frustrating part is that Torbjørn Heggem did everything right. He stayed focused, finished the move brilliantly and should be celebrating one of the biggest goals of his career. Instead, the conversation is about a decision that, in my opinion, is simply wrong. VAR is supposed to correct clear and obvious mistakes, not create controversy where there wasn’t any. I don’t believe this was a clear foul. I believe it was two players competing physically, which is something we’ve seen in football for decades. These decisions change matches. At 2–1, England are under enormous pressure. Instead, Norway have a perfectly good goal taken away, and that is incredibly difficult to accept. If that’s enough contact to disallow a goal, then football is becoming impossible for centre-forwards. In my opinion, Norway deserved that goal, and they’ve every right to feel extremely disappointed.”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
These comments attributed to Ole Gunnar Solskjær do not appear in credible news coverage of the match. The image shows him speaking at the 2024 Oslo Business Forum, unrelated to the game. obforum.com/speaker/2024/o… nytimes.com/athletic/live-… standard.co.uk/sport/football…
446
1,283
60
8,892
460,357
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
Det er ingen egen VAR-protokoll under VM, men FIFA har implementert det IFAB besluttet i mai. Og ja: 1) Skandale at det ikke ble dropp da ballen traff vaier. Chip funker altså ikke «høyt i lufta»? 2) Skandale at det ble dømt frispark mot Haaland. VAR skulle aldri anbefalt OFR.
18
21
3
422
28,059
The day after Yesterday! A principal discussion - nothing to do with England: 1. The ball hits the wire of the Spidercam a) players and the bench react instantly b) video-technology from different channels show it 2. FIFA say it did not hit the wire So two simple questions that need to be answered: Does FIFA lie? Is the technology NOT working?
477
249
23
2,884
414,288
FPL Weekend Warrior retweeted
Our eyes tell us the ball hit the camera cable BBC’s 3D technology tells us the ball hit the camera cable But the sensor inside the ball didn’t notice it therefore it didn’t happen and we must all bow down to the technology Dystopian.
461
1,814
159
26,882
1,696,143