Kathleen

I'm watching FKR use Sandra Birchmore's phone data as evidence that Matthew Farwell killed her because her phone never moved again after he left her apartment. Interesting. John O'Keefe's phone recorded its final movement seconds after Karen Read's Lexus reversed, then stayed on the front lawn of 34 Fairview for the rest of the night. Yet somehow, we're supposed to believe John walked into the house, got beaten to death, and was carried back outside without his phone recording any additional movement or steps. In Sandra's case, the absence of movement is compelling evidence. In John's case, it's apparently evidence of a massive police conspiracy. I'm not suggesting the two cases are identical or that phone data alone proves murder. I'm asking for a little intellectual consistency. You don't get to champion digital forensic evidence when it implicates someone you believe is guilty and dismiss the same principles when they undermine your preferred narrative. The data doesn't lie. People do. And sometimes the double standard tells you more than the argument itself.