Pinned Tweet
SpaceX has identified five potential contingency landing zones for Starship Flight 15 as it prepares for its first-ever tower-catch attempt at Starbase.
This mission includes multiple backup plans to ensure Starship can safely return to Earth if conditions prevent the planned landing.
Here's how the five scenarios are designed to work:
1. Indian Ocean — After Ascent
If the orbital insertion burn is skipped, Starship remains on a suborbital trajectory and targets a predetermined landing zone in the Indian Ocean.
2. North of Hawaii — Early Mission Abort
If the mission needs to end shortly after reaching orbit, Starship can return to a designated landing area in the Pacific Ocean, north of Hawaii.
3. Off the Coast of Chile — Mid-Mission Contingency
Another return opportunity allows Starship to descend into the eastern Pacific, far offshore from Chile.
4. Gulf of Mexico — Tower Catch Abort
If SpaceX decides to cancel the tower catch before the final approach, Starship has an alternative offshore landing option in the Gulf.
5. North of Hawaii — Late Mission Contingency
If the planned deorbit burn is skipped, Starship completes another orbit around Earth before returning to its designated Pacific landing zone.
The bigger picture:
SpaceX isn't leaving Starship's return to chance.
From ascent to orbital operations and final approach, the mission incorporates multiple contingency options. Vehicle health checks and flight conditions will determine whether Starship proceeds with the planned tower catch or switches to an alternative landing strategy.
The goal remains ambitious: bring Starship home safely and push reusable rocket technology another step forward.
One mission. Five backup landing options. A major step toward fully reusable spaceflight.
OPTIMUS JUST DROVE A $43,000 TESLA! 🚙🤖
Imagine a humanoid robot sitting behind the wheel of a Tesla, gripping the steering wheel and navigating real-world traffic.
No staged demonstration.
No controlled testing track.
Just Optimus behind the wheel on public roads.
While many people still associate humanoid robots with factory work and impressive backflips, this raises a much bigger question about what they're capable of.
Could we be approaching a future where robots don't just work in factories but also drive our cars?
Are we witnessing the early stages of a robotaxi revolution, or is this simply another glimpse of what's coming?
Elon Musk says medical school is now pointless:
"Everyone will have access to medical care that is better than what the president receives right now"
Peter Diamandis: "So don't go into medical school?"
Elon Musk: "Yes. Yeah. Pointless. But I would say that applies to any form of education"
"5 or 4 years from now, we'll have better medical care than anyone has today, available for everyone"
Elon Musk is reportedly worth $839 billion. His daughter, Vivian Wilson, shares a home with three roommates.
The contrast between their lives is striking. But the story goes far beyond money.
At 18, Vivian went to court to legally remove her father's name. Her reason was clear:
"I no longer live with or wish to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form."
The judge approved her request.
Vivian was born in 2004, an IVF twin. As a teenager, she came out as transgender. Musk initially signed the documents related to her transition, but later claimed he had been deceived.
Then came 2024.
During an interview with Jordan Peterson, Musk made a shocking statement about his daughter:
"My son Xavier is dead, killed by the woke mind virus."
At the time, Vivian was living in a small apartment in Tokyo, attending college and preparing for her final exams.
She eventually responded publicly:
"Last time I checked, I am indeed not dead."
Musk also made claims about her sexuality and autism. Vivian pushed back, describing those claims as entirely false.
And when questions about financial support and inheritance came up, she made her position clear: she was financially independent and wasn't living the billionaire lifestyle people might imagine.
Was she afraid of speaking publicly?
Apparently not.
"I don't really have anything to lose."
She described speaking out as one of the most cathartic experiences of her life.
There are two sides to this complicated family story.
Musk appears to believe he lost his child to an ideology he deeply opposes. Vivian, meanwhile, is asserting her identity and independence, making it clear that she is alive and wants to be recognised on her own terms.
One man has unimaginable wealth and global influence. His daughter is building an independent life away from that world.
But perhaps the most important question isn't about money, fame or ideology.
Can a parent grieve the relationship they once had with a child who is still alive, or does that grief become something else when the parent refuses to accept who that child has become?
Elon Musk suggested yesterday that Tesla may choose to rent out its Optimus humanoid robots rather than sell them outright.
This could mean a monthly subscription or pay-per-use model instead of purchasing a robot for $30,000+.
The subscription could cover insurance, maintenance, repairs and ongoing support.
It makes business sense for Tesla while lowering the barrier to entry for consumers.
Instead of spending the equivalent of buying a new car, people could simply pay to access a humanoid robot when they need one.
Robots as a service could be the future.
FutureX retweeted
JUDGE: “Ma’am, why did you come into my courtroom dressed like this?”
WOMAN: “Because this is exactly what I was wearing when it happened.”
BAILIFF: “Your Honor, should I get her something to cover herself?”
WOMAN: “No. Please don’t.”
JUDGE: “Why?”
WOMAN: “Because the moment you cover me up, people will start asking why I look different from the woman who reported the incident.”
The courtroom went quiet.
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “Your Honor, her clothing has nothing to do with what happened.”
WOMAN: “Exactly.”
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “Exactly what?”
WOMAN: “Then why has everybody been asking me about it?”
JUDGE: “Counsel, let her speak.”
WOMAN: “I was told to bring whatever evidence I had. So I brought the clothes. I didn’t change them. I didn’t repair them. I didn’t wash them.”
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “Are you trying to make the court feel sorry for you?”
WOMAN: “No. I’m trying to make the court listen to me.”
JUDGE: “Tell us what happened.”
WOMAN: “He assaulted me.”
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “And you knew him?”
WOMAN: “Yes.”
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “You trusted him?”
WOMAN: “Before that night, yes.”
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: “Then why did you go with him?”
WOMAN: “Because I didn’t know he was going to hurt me.”
