LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust) header
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust) profile picture

Lawyer ⚖️ Crypto OG (2016) 👨🏾‍💻 Former Intelligence 🐿️ Real Estate Investor 🏘️ Top 3% Sportsbettor 🏈 Maybe I'll do a pod one day 🎙️

Web3
Joined April 2016
Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)Photo by LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 (@goodguyaugust)
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
Can’t blame anyone who feels this way or is rotating capital/diversifying at the moment. I’ve said for a good year or two now that the *only* sustained positive PA for $LINK will come in the form of tokenomics updates. Bigger buybacks, staking updates, anything. Fundamentals are unmatched in the space, but unless institutional buys flood in.. you still need to appeal to retail.
ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca I think I've reached a point where diversification is becoming more important to me. I waited until LINK.NYC to reassess but today, I sold 75% of my all ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca Avg cost of all those were $18. So taking the loss on those. I'm maintaining roughly 25% of my portfolio exposure through $GLNK shares and June calls. Still a substantial position and exposed to the asymmetry. My biggest investing successes came from concentrating heavily in a few asymmetric opportunities in the stock market where you are a direct shareholder. With Chainlink, my conviction in its business and critical infrastructure hasn't changed. But I've come to accept a legitimate risk: Chainlink's success doesn't necessarily guarantee LINK token value accrual like owning shares in a stock. This is a fact and a risk that one has to accept when investing in any crypto. Payment Abstraction and the Reserve are promising, but questions around tokenomics remain. ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca also trades with the broader crypto market, a space filled with misinformation and narratives that often overshadow fundamentals. I simply don't want my portfolio overly dependent on something this abstract, especially when I see other asymmetric opportunities with clearer paths to shareholder value. Opportunity Cost is a very real thing. Here's where I'm looking to reallocate the rest of my capital: $AMD: Going back to the one I was in from the 20s and sold in the triple 100s to rotate to Chainlink. Huge upside over the next five years. I believe this becomes a multitrilliondollar company. $HIMS: Significantly mispriced. A market cap repricing play where 10x over the next 3–4 years isn't out of the question. $NAUT: Big asymmetric bet. If execution goes right, the upside could be obscene. Have done a lot of DD on this and their latest earnings show they are goig in the right direction and the risk reward is really good at these levels imo. However, its still pre-revenue, so substantial risk and as a result size accordingly. $NFLX: Trading around 18x earnings at $62. I see significant value over a five year horizon. Already accumulating and will continue averaging down, with $54-58 being my absolute sweet spot. I'll also maintain 10–15% cash reserves for future opportunities. This isn't FUD. The bears haven't won. I still strongly believe Chainlink is one of the most misunderstood and biggest asymmetric opportunities in the market. I just don't know and no one knows when we see price movement and don't want all my capital exposed. But being right about the technology and being right about the investment aren't necessarily the same thing. I'll continue covering Chainlink alongside these other investments.
1
3
20
1,318
Can’t blame anyone who feels this way or is rotating capital/diversifying at the moment. I’ve said for a good year or two now that the *only* sustained positive PA for $LINK will come in the form of tokenomics updates. Bigger buybacks, staking updates, anything. Fundamentals are unmatched in the space, but unless institutional buys flood in.. you still need to appeal to retail.
ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca I think I've reached a point where diversification is becoming more important to me. I waited until LINK.NYC to reassess but today, I sold 75% of my all ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca Avg cost of all those were $18. So taking the loss on those. I'm maintaining roughly 25% of my portfolio exposure through $GLNK shares and June calls. Still a substantial position and exposed to the asymmetry. My biggest investing successes came from concentrating heavily in a few asymmetric opportunities in the stock market where you are a direct shareholder. With Chainlink, my conviction in its business and critical infrastructure hasn't changed. But I've come to accept a legitimate risk: Chainlink's success doesn't necessarily guarantee LINK token value accrual like owning shares in a stock. This is a fact and a risk that one has to accept when investing in any crypto. Payment Abstraction and the Reserve are promising, but questions around tokenomics remain. ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca also trades with the broader crypto market, a space filled with misinformation and narratives that often overshadow fundamentals. I simply don't want my portfolio overly dependent on something this abstract, especially when I see other asymmetric opportunities with clearer paths to shareholder value. Opportunity Cost is a very real thing. Here's where I'm looking to reallocate the rest of my capital: $AMD: Going back to the one I was in from the 20s and sold in the triple 100s to rotate to Chainlink. Huge upside over the next five years. I believe this becomes a multitrilliondollar company. $HIMS: Significantly mispriced. A market cap repricing play where 10x over the next 3–4 years isn't out of the question. $NAUT: Big asymmetric bet. If execution goes right, the upside could be obscene. Have done a lot of DD on this and their latest earnings show they are goig in the right direction and the risk reward is really good at these levels imo. However, its still pre-revenue, so substantial risk and as a result size accordingly. $NFLX: Trading around 18x earnings at $62. I see significant value over a five year horizon. Already accumulating and will continue averaging down, with $54-58 being my absolute sweet spot. I'll also maintain 10–15% cash reserves for future opportunities. This isn't FUD. The bears haven't won. I still strongly believe Chainlink is one of the most misunderstood and biggest asymmetric opportunities in the market. I just don't know and no one knows when we see price movement and don't want all my capital exposed. But being right about the technology and being right about the investment aren't necessarily the same thing. I'll continue covering Chainlink alongside these other investments.
1
3
20
1,318
I don’t get why Frost ‘s upset matters to Nebraska fans. He found a way to go 3-9 at Nebraska, repeatedly made horrible coaching mistakes, and was a raging alcoholic who instilled 0 discipline in his players. Going 4-3 with 1 upset at a shit school doesn’t bother me.
1
101
Frustrating game, Nebraska was the better team but they shot themselves in the foot. Also, I only saw about 1,000 Indiana fans here max. Not a very strong fanbase. Congrats to their team though, they hung in there down two scores with less than 10 minutes left.
1
1
2
193
Lol Kostyuk is trash, Idk why yall dickride her 🤣
7
447
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
This is a very odd, weak announcement without the auditor being identified. The value of these certifications is entirely dependent on the quality of the auditor willing to put their name behind them. Since the auditor isn't even named, one can only speculate that either LayerZero doesn't want to use their name (because the auditor is a dumpster-tier nobody) or the auditor isn't allowing LayerZero to use their name, which begets the question of why.
18
14
5
165
15,138
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
XRPL is being tested by the BIS as a database (among others) to publish economic data on it, where the XRP token is being used to prevent free spam in the amount of .00001 XRP; not for "liquidity" or a "bridge currency." Chainlink CCIP and CRE is being used in production to move value cross-borders and cross-chain for 600 banks. The revenue generated from this activity is used to buy back the LINK token. ripple:native ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
bottomline.com/us >$16 trillion payments moved annually >15% of SWIFT's cross-border volume >1,000,000 business customers including JPM, US Bank, BNY, American Express, TD Bank, etc. >used by 90 out of 100 Fortune 100 companies >Exclusively using Chainlink CRE + CCIP to enable cross-chain, cross-border payments for its 600 bank customers The ticker is ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
7
17
2
109
12,597
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
They’re gonna need @chainlink for that.
39 US STATE BANKING ASSOCIATIONS FORM BANKCHAIN ALLIANCE, TARGETING A 2027 LAUNCH OF AN INDUSTRY-OWNED BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK FOR TOKENIZED BANK DEPOSITS, STABLECOINS, SMART PAYMENTS AND AUTOMATED SETTLEMENT
2
4
96
2,625
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
Some bittersweet news: after more than three years, I’m wrapping up my time @DigitalChamber and joining @Chainlink as Head of Policy. I’m incredibly proud of what team TDC achieved together - from helping get the GENIUS Act signed into law and moving the Clarity Act forward, to securing 50 government speakers for the DC Blockchain Summit, and so many more wins. I'll always be grateful to @CodyCarboneDC, @ZuneraMazhar, @PerianneDC and so many others for betting on me and giving me room to run. We pulled off the impossible and made memories I'll carry forever. I’m closing this chapter with enormous gratitude for what we built and so much excitement for what’s next. I’m thrilled to be joining Chainlink Labs at a moment when global markets are moving onchain at lightning speed, Chainlink is building the infrastructure making that transition possible. Immensely thankful to @SergeyNazarov, Ben Sherwin, @kkirkbos, Cedrick Dalluge, and the entire Chainlink team for their trust and I can’t wait to get to work. Let’s keep building 🫡
58
83
11
778
64,213
Can anyone point to a single entity that has adopted this product since its release???
Collateral is fragmented by design. Our newest article makes the case for #QuantFusion in capital markets - solving mobility across the whole market, not just within one consortium. Read the article: quant.network/perspectives/c… #CollateralMobility #CapitalMarkets #Tokenisation
1
641
Monfils losing his concentration and shitting the bed against an inferior opponent. Never fails.
6
768
Katie Boulter and Alex De Minaur have both been kinda ass since they got married.
1
12
1,862
LIMITLΞSS 🐺👑 retweeted
Hey @ben_mckenzie, As someone who was awarded the Defender of Freedom Award, Lawyer of the Year Award, and Consumer Advocate of the Year, related to my pro bono legal work protecting retail investors within the digital asset space, you should know that you sound like a 🤡 bragging about protecting Americans from Donald Trump’s exploitation of the crypto industry. Trump already made $1.4 Billion trading/exploiting crypto. In fact, he made more profit than @coinbase did in 2025. But the reason he was able to is because of a lack of regulatory Clarity related to digital assets. Because we have a corrupt and inept Congress, we still apply 1933 statutes and a 1946 Supreme Court case involving 🍊 groves to modern day technologies like Blockchain, AI, Robotics, Automation, Quantum Computing, etc. You claim that you helped stop Trump’s crypto corruption. Are you really that stupid or are you’re intentionally gaslighting people. Because you seem to be claiming that Trump is going to stop making money off Crypto because the Clarity Act didn’t get passed. I bet you also think predatory banks are the good guys, don’t you?
Ben McKenzie is celebrating beating the “corrupt” Clarity Act by having a beer. I have not comment on his words. I’m just baffled that he’s publicly drinking a beer shot out of a whiskey tumbler.
229
420
33
2,662
171,860
Shang taking a MTO in the second set just before Darderi serves for the match is nasty work.
1
8
729
Jesus, Shapovalov is such a clown.
5
775
Jaime Faria is such a clown.
6
660
Alycia Parks really trying to choke against a 5'4 player with zero power. Insane, the WTA is a joke man.
6
624
Bondar and Zidansek are both horrible. I know guys with full-time jobs that could beat either one. #WTA
1
1
5
615
Sakellaridi v. Toma (Tennis Channel) These two lumpy tards are both just awful. 😂😂
1
5
423