Human nature, venture, resilience, critical thinking. See & design invisible influences that drive behaviour. Future Fit Cities & co-founder at InceptionU

Calgary (most of the time)
Joined June 2008
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Hannah Arendt delivered this lecture, "Thinking and Moral Considerations," in 1971, several years after she had covered Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem. That trial left her with a nagging question: how could someone commit such horrific acts without being a monster or fanatic? She concluded Eichmann's defining trait was simply an inability to think — he relied on clichés and fell apart when none applied. This lecture is her attempt to work out whether moral judgment depends on this capacity to think. To explore this, she turns to Socrates as her model of real thinking. He described himself three ways: a gadfly who wakes people up, a midwife who helps others examine their own ideas without ever supplying answers, and an electric ray that paralyzes others by first being paralyzed itself. Genuine thinking, in her view, doesn't produce fixed rules — it unsettles things, which is both its value and its risk, since that same unsettling can tip into nihilism if people mistake uncertainty for permission. Her central insight is that thinking is really an inner conversation — a "two-in-one" dialogue with yourself. Conscience, she argues, isn't some built-in moral sense; it's just what happens when you're forced to face yourself in that inner dialogue. People who never pause for this conversation have nothing stopping them from doing terrible things, because there's no inner witness there to object. She ends by linking thinking to judgment — our everyday ability to say "this is wrong" without consulting a rulebook. Thinking itself is quiet and produces no visible results, but in moments when society's norms collapse, people who've practiced this habit of inner questioning are more likely to recognize wrongdoing and refuse to go along with it. cooperative-individualism.or…
12
124
7
380
17,394
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Scientists & science journalists decry the public's rejection of science, but are oblivious to the major cause: the perception, sometimes correct, that scientists are just another political faction. Among the guiltiest perpetrators are the recent editors of Scientific American, who turned this once-beloved treasure into a left-wing propaganda rag. This absolutely does not justify the Trump administration's unconstitutional meddling, but the new owners are right to restore it to its mission of explaining science to Americans. The Nation reports on The Fall of “Scientific American” thenation.com/article/societ…
1
246
47
1,192
47,180
I’ve never ever seen Ricky Gervais like this before …
220
1,900
223
26,602
3,291,176
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan
14
290
31
718
14,156
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Mom and dad aren't mad, they’re just disappointed that you experimented with separation.
68
513
45
3,649
123,445
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
The Alberta taxpayers provides $1.78B annually in subsidies to the oil and gas industry. Most Albertans argue that highly profitable, mature corporations should cover their own operational costs without taxpayer handouts. A 2026 Pembina Institute poll found that 61% of Albertans oppose using taxpayer money to subsidize the highly profitable oil & gas industry. #Alberta iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/…
11
78
5
152
3,047
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
This is going to be a meme for decades.
A couple were spotted enjoying a drink on a café terrace near the Arc de Triomphe on Saturday, close to where some of the main rioting took place in central Paris.
77
96
5
1,356
123,396
What he did was the equivalent of coming to work, and in a high-stakes moment, hijacking the work in front of customers, coworkers, leadership and history. He was free to do it, and they were free to fire him. Specific flag has nothing to do with it.
We are disturbed to learn that @CalgaryOpera has removed bass-baritone Gabriel Sanchez-Ortega from future performances of "Tosca" after he unveiled a Palestinian flag during the curtain call on opening night. Art is political, and artists should not be punished for expressing support for the Palestinian people as they face a genocide. This decision must be reversed.
1
2
110
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Economists spent 200 years assuming humans make perfect decisions, until a political scientist proved we just grab the first option that's good enough, won the Nobel Prize in economics for it, and then taught a machine to think the exact same way. I read this and immediately thought about every decision I made today. Not one of them was perfect. All of them were good enough. His name was Herbert Simon. The book is called Administrative Behavior. It started with a college paper about playgrounds. In 1935, Simon was a student in Milwaukee studying how the city spent its parks budget. He expected the managers to weigh every option and pick the one that gave the city the most value. That's not what he saw. The people who maintained the playgrounds wanted the money for repairs. The people who ran activities wanted it for staff. Nobody was comparing every possible choice. Each side just pushed for what looked reasonable from where they stood, and they called it a day. That small observation broke something huge. Economics was built on a fantasy person. Economists called him "economic man." He knows every option. He has unlimited time. He calculates the perfect choice every single time. Simon looked around and asked one question. Who actually lives like that? Nobody does. Your brain has a small amount of attention and a short amount of time. So instead of searching for the best choice, you search until you find one that clears the bar, and then you stop. You do it all day without noticing. - You park in the first open spot, not the closest one - You pick a restaurant after reading three reviews, not three hundred - You hire the first candidate who checks the boxes - You take the job offer before seeing every other job on Earth Simon gave this a name. Satisficing. Satisfy plus suffice. And he gave the bigger idea a name too. Bounded rationality. We are rational, just inside walls we can't climb over. He wrote about the real enemy decades before anyone had a smartphone. "A wealth of information creates a poverty of attention." In 1978, the man who wasn't an economist won the Nobel Prize in economics for telling economists their perfect human didn't exist. But that wasn't even his most important work. Back in 1955, Simon and his colleague Allen Newell asked a wild question. If humans solve hard problems with shortcuts instead of checking every possibility, could a machine do the same? They built a program called the Logic Theorist. They gave it a famous math book full of proofs that took two of the greatest minds in philosophy years to write. The program didn't try every path. That would take forever. It used rules of thumb to chase the paths that looked promising and skip the rest. The same way you skip the parking spots at the far end of the lot. It proved 38 of the first 52 theorems. One of its proofs was cleaner than the original. In January 1956, Simon walked into his class and told his students: "Over Christmas, Allen Newell and I invented a thinking machine." It became one of the very first AI programs ever written. Think about the loop he closed. He studied why humans can't be perfect. Then he built a machine that worked because it stopped trying to be perfect too. We keep asking AI to be flawless. The man who helped invent it already knew the secret. Good enough is how every mind gets anything done.
34
139
24
391
24,592
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
50 years ago, Dave Allen told a joke about newspaper readers in 1976, it would become more famous 11 years after this on Yes, Prime Minister in 1987.
87
967
69
4,374
316,413
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
„Kein Mensch hat das Recht zu gehorchen!“ Am 9. November 1964 wurde ein Hörfunkgespräch zwischen Hannah Arendt und dem Publizisten Joachim Fest vom Südwestfunk ausgestrahlt. Darin sprach Arendt über Adolf Eichmann, der sich während seines Prozesses in Jerusalem unter anderem auf Immanuel Kant berufen hatte, um sein Handeln mit seiner Pflicht zum Gehorsam zu rechtfertigen. Arendt kritisierte Eichmanns Berufung auf Kant scharf. Sie bezeichnete seine Dummheit als „so empörend“, weil er sich ausgerechnet auf einen Philosophen berief, dessen Moralverständnis die eigenständige Prüfung des eigenen Handelns verlangt. Arendt erklärte: „Ja. Natürlich eine Unverschämtheit, nicht? Von Herrn Eichmann. Kants ganze Moral läuft doch darauf hinaus, dass jeder Mensch bei jeder Handlung sich selbst überlegen muss, ob die Maxime seines Handelns zum allgemeinen Gesetz werden kann. […] Es ist ja gerade sozusagen das extrem Umgekehrte des Gehorsams! Jeder ist Gesetzgeber. Kein Mensch hat das Recht zu gehorchen bei Kant.“ Hannah Arendt bringt damit einen zentralen Gedanken der kantischen Moralphilosophie auf den Punkt: Kein Mensch kann seine moralische Verantwortung dadurch abgeben, dass er sich auf den Befehl eines anderen beruft. Wer die Philosophie Immanuel Kants ernst nimmt, muss sein Handeln selbst prüfen und darf sich nicht hinter blindem Gehorsam verstecken. Arendts Aussage ist deshalb keine pauschale Aufforderung, jede Regel und jede Anweisung zu missachten. Sie richtet sich gegen die Vorstellung, Gehorsam könne die eigene moralische Urteilsfähigkeit und Verantwortung ersetzen. In seinem 1784 veröffentlichten Aufsatz „Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?“ formuliert Immanuel Kant den Gedanken der geistigen Selbstständigkeit folgendermaßen: „Aufklärung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbst verschuldeten Unmündigkeit. Unmündigkeit ist das Unvermögen, sich seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen. Selbstverschuldet ist diese Unmündigkeit, wenn die Ursache derselben nicht am Mangel des Verstandes, sondern der Entschließung und des Mutes liegt, sich seiner ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen. Sapere aude! Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen! ist also der Wahlspruch der Aufklärung. Faulheit und Feigheit sind die Ursachen, warum ein so großer Teil der Menschen, nachdem sie die Natur längst von fremder Leitung freigesprochen (naturaliter maiorennes), dennoch gerne zeitlebens unmündig bleiben; und warum es anderen so leicht wird, sich zu deren Vormündern aufzuwerfen. Es ist so bequem, unmündig zu sein. Habe ich ein Buch, das für mich Verstand hat, einen Seelsorger, der für mich Gewissen hat, einen Arzt, der für mich die Diät beurteilt usw., so brauche ich mich ja nicht selbst zu bemühen. Ich habe nicht nötig zu denken, wenn ich nur bezahlen kann; andere werden das verdrießliche Geschäft schon für mich übernehmen. Dass der bei Weitem größte Teil der Menschen den Schritt zur Mündigkeit, außer dem, dass er beschwerlich ist, auch für sehr gefährlich hält, dafür sorgen schon jene Vormünder, die die Oberaufsicht über sie gütigst auf sich genommen haben.“ Der Mensch besitzt die Fähigkeit, seinen eigenen Verstand zu gebrauchen, und sollte den Mut haben, diese Fähigkeit auch einzusetzen. Er sollte weder sein Denken noch sein moralisches Urteil anderen überlassen. Er sollte prüfen, hinterfragen und zweifeln, statt sich blind auf Autoritäten zu verlassen, denn ohne die Bereitschaft, vermeintliche Gewissheiten zu überprüfen, kann es keine wirkliche geistige Selbstständigkeit und keine selbstverantwortliche moralische Entscheidung geben.
28
205
19
596
25,833
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Gary Oldman giggling at farts dubbed into his movies, then laughing 'til the tears roll down his cheeks, may well be the happiest minute of your day!
80
1,019
126
8,703
693,990
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
A wayward pianist (Dudley Moore) receives an unexpected visit from the Music Police (Peter Cook). This sketch comes from Behind the Fridge, the stage show Peter Cook and Dudley Moore performed in the early 1970s in London's West End, on Broadway, and perhaps most successfully in Australia, where it was recorded for Channel 9 in Melbourne. The title was, of course, a playful nod to Beyond the Fringe. Sadly, the show effectively marked the end of their original partnership, although they reunited a few years later for the Broadway revue Good Evening, followed by Derek and Clive, which was an entirely different beast altogether! The sheer ingenuity of this sketch is astonishing. Weaving together the language of music, policing and motoring into something so consistently funny is an extraordinary piece of writing. While I can't say for certain, everything I've read suggests it was very much a collaborative effort between Cook and Moore. My God, it's good.
23
131
16
600
37,739
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Reminder, as diesel prices rise today after Trump and Putin’s nonsensical deal…
It's all been bullshit. All of it. Diesel, energy deals, peace negotiations, everything between Trump Co. and Putin's mafia is a charade. All they're doing is laundering money and trying to lift sanctions. It's all they care about and all they know how to do.
31
752
4
3,753
37,131
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
"The people on the right make me hate the right, the people on the left make me hate the left. In fact, with a man of the right, I am on the left; with a man of the left, I am on the right." — Emil Cioran
49
300
85
1,374
54,723
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
Genuinely very funny the second this hit, the amount of Alberta separatist accounts fell off the face of the earth, lmfao
If confirmed, this is telling: Russian data centres get hit, and online activity around AfD suddenly plummets. 📉 So much talk about German patriotism… then the connection from Russia goes down. 🤔🇷🇺
186
1,721
55
15,207
294,940
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
“The purpose of education, finally, is to create in a person the ability to look at the world for himself, to make his own decisions.” — James Baldwin
15
223
11
826
15,414
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
In 1920 people from Ilford were telling Jews to go back to Palestine. In 2026 people from Ilford gather in London to tell Jews to get out of Palestine. Different century - same message: "You do not belong." Antisemitism is what it is.
75
1,213
25
4,539
49,648
Greg Hart 🇺🇦 retweeted
He's right. #ableg #yyccc
Should Danielle Smith be able to order your local council to vote to approve rezoning for a massive AI data centre? And threaten to fire your democratically elected mayor if they vote against it? This latest provincial overreach isn't about density. It's about your legal right to a fair hearing.
6
8
20
779
So much genius in this excerpt. The reason we need broad-based competency using critical thinking is because those ‘savage controversies’ are the ones that define civil society.
“If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you should feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way. Persecution is used in theology, not in arithmetic, because in arithmetic there is knowledge, but in theology there is only opinion. So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants.” — Bertrand Russell, An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish
38