alhaji.sol 👨🏽‍💻

When I first looked at the bonus model on @RebateLaunch, one question stood out. If every buyer receives extra tokens, wouldn't the treasury eventually run out? The latest explanation highlights something important: tokens don't only leave the treasury. Certain activities also return tokens to it. Under the described $REBATE model: • Every buy receives a 3% bonus from the treasury. • Every sell contributes 3% of the sold tokens back to the treasury. • Adding liquidity contributes 3% of the tokens added. Here's a simplified example. Imagine someone sells 20,000 $REBATE. At a 3% contribution rate, 600 tokens return to the treasury. If another buyer subsequently purchases 20,000 tokens from the pool, a 3% bonus would require 600 tokens. In this simplified example, the treasury receives 600 tokens and later distributes 600 tokens. That illustrates why the model isn't designed as a one-way distribution system. But I'd also make an important distinction. The treasury's sustainability depends on how the contract handles token flows, not merely on the assumption that every sell will be followed by an equal buy. That's why I'd examine the verified contract and actual reserve balances. What interests me most is the attempt to connect bonus funding to the movement of tokens through the pool. Instead of relying on unlimited minting, the design uses an existing supply and mechanisms intended to replenish the reserve. For $REBATE, that's a feature worth understanding beyond the headline of receiving extra tokens. A sustainable incentive needs a funding mechanism, not just an attractive percentage.