HYPERSTITION (@hyperstitionz) header
HYPERSTITION (@hyperstitionz) profile picture
Joined October 2023
Photo by HYPERSTITION (@hyperstitionz)Photo by HYPERSTITION (@hyperstitionz)Photo by HYPERSTITION (@hyperstitionz)
HYPERSTITION retweeted
现在最聪明的一批人,正在往两个完全相反的方向走。 一拨往前走,扎进大模型、算法、机器人的深处,在没有人走过的地方,替文明开启下一段路。 一拨往后走,回归到身体、心灵、信仰,去探索自然的本源。 这两拨人有一个共同点,比方向本身更要紧:他们都不再相信旧世界那套玩法了。一个在探文明的下一站,一个在找文明的源头。 但最后,他们终会相遇的。 “旧世界那套玩法”本质上是工业化和商业效率叙事:把人异化成齿轮,用线性增长、KPI、消费主义和世俗成功来定义一切价值。 最敏锐的一批人最先感受到这套系统的边际效益见顶(甚至开始反噬人本身),所以率先离场: 往前走的人(大模型、算法、具身智能),是在把旧世界里关于“算力、效率、生产力”的规则推到极致——让硅基彻底接管工具属性,逼近“智能与造物到底是什么”的边界。 往后走的人(身体、心性、信仰、自然本源),是在剥离现代性强加给人的符号和焦虑,往回找碳基生命最底层的感知力,回答“人活着的本体体验到底是什么”。 之所以终会相遇,是因为这两条路走到极点其实撞上的是同一个终极问题:当硅基把所有“有用之事”(工具理性、世俗劳作)全包揽之后,碳基生命还剩下什么?意识、觉知和生命本身到底是什么? 向前走到尽头,必须在哲学和心性里找方向;向后退回本源,也刚好接住技术解放出来的空白。就像一个圆环,从同一个破局点背道而驰,走到底自然会在圆的另一端碰头。
261
534
90
3,875
171,047
HYPERSTITION retweeted
They can only control people who fear death
709
2,227
114
15,927
244,930
HYPERSTITION retweeted
Casuals are hyping up Madrid vs City slop for the 5th year running, when PSG vs Chelsea is right there teapawt.org/loveneichan/status/203…
9
76
1
1,235
27,354
HYPERSTITION retweeted
Genetic Morality in Dune
11
82
7
927
26,893
HYPERSTITION retweeted
Americans will bomb Iran and then go give Dune III an Oscar
64
3,480
154
45,086
1,038,466
HYPERSTITION retweeted
289
8,265
343
64,631
2,225,691
HYPERSTITION retweeted
WARNING Massive AI hype being built in a sudden burst (and most of it fake) 1) A scary article: I was surprised to read a long article on Twitter (X) claiming it's just 6-12 months before a Covid-like event changes this world. It claims this will be the AI-event, where most white-collar jobs worldwide would be gone, because AI is that good now. That article got 100 M plus views. Clearly, people are spooked (naturally). So the psy-op has worked. (and I saw other similar dark articles too) 2) Suddenly many influencers are pushing the same narrative, and it so turns out that media reported many are being paid heavy sums by AI firms to push their story (that AI singularity is arriving). But if AI is "revolutionary", does it need an influencer push? No. This should be a clear signal it's hyped. 3) A correction in IT stocks' and SaaS stock's prices is suddenly creating a doom scenario about these companies dying any moment now, with second- and third-order effects on entire economy. Stock investors who haven't studied AI technicals are automatically assuming it's all over, dead, gone, finished. WRONG. NO. 4) What is the truth, and what's most likely to happen? In my opinion, based on years of observing AI trends, reading and learning AI technology, and doing AI at various levels, my take is as follows. I urge you to read this, and preserve your sanity. Please don't panic, nothing catastrophic is happening anytime soon. A) IPO pressure: AI firms are going crazy pushing their God-narrative, as many giant IPOs are lined up soon. They need public to buy their paid subscriptions or else the story goes kaput. So they are creating a false hype. It's shameful, anti-social and deeply hurtful. (Almost all AI firms released doom-scenarios just before their next funding rounds; investors who haven't learnt technology fall for it; pure FOMO. This playbook is so repetitive it's comical) B) OpenAI is spooked: Sam Altman has lost the lead he temporarily managed to build against Google and others, and now his loss-making enterprise isn't the darling of any investor any more. He's terrified. C) Elon Musk's Grok does not have the traction in consumer space anyway near what's needed to make it a profit-making entity. So with many other capex-heavy AI firms. But the GPU / TPU hungry AI ops need more capex each day, not less. It's a dead-end for most except cash rich Googles. D) Enterprise AI is patchy, lagging, slow, choppy: Anyone who has ever built a company, or run a large department, or consulted a business enterprise knows how random, undefined, tacit, and unstructured most of the real world work actually is. No way is AI ever going to replace humans doing those very complex things on a daily basis. No way. Not tomorrow, not in 10 years. NO. (I am not even beginning to get into 'regulated' industries' needs) E) Consumer AI is cool, but has limits: The more AI regular humans (of all ages) use, the more the artificiality of it becomes apparent to anyone. The novelty cannot sustain the commercial numbers needed to make AI (foundation models) profitable. OpenAI and Perplexity would never have given free tiers for most Indians otherwise. They desperately need folks to stick to this opium. F) LLMs aren't solved, Hallucinations aren't zero: The structure of any LLM is such that it will ALWAYS hallucinate, no matter how much fine-tuning humans do. In most sensitive business operations, you cannot allow LLMs to control the core data at all. Can you run an airline with a Generative AI system (LLM-based) that's 98% accurate? Can you run a precision-mfg. operation at 97% accuracy? Can you run a financial services firm with 95% accuracy? NO. NEVER. So the deterministic, old-fashioned computer software ERP will go nowhere. Nowhere at all. LLMs will be good as a top layer on those ERPs to glean insights, nothing more. [ None can 'train away' hallucinations in a probabilistic LLM model, using larger datasets. You are actually claiming I'll build a dice that lands a 4, or a 6, each time ] G) Agents aren't magical, humans aren't going anywhere: Multi-step agentic AI is being touted as the final solution where one founder sitting alone can run 100 agents and build an empire. Try doing that once, experience the frequent breakdowns, see the regular edges and new complexities, and you will realize that other than the most mundane of tasks, nothing else will be seamless. Yes, Voice AI agents are good, and many in the developing world are now deploying those, but that's hardly a cutting-edge technology that'll replace all humans. H) IT and SaaS firms are going nowhere: Ironically, the more AI happens in enterprises, the more will be the need for humans to supervised and orchestrate those bits and pieces of AI, to ensure nothing flies off the rails. The complex software code that Claude and Codex can write only changes the nature of work for the human coders who now have to check the AI code thoroughly for the many edge cases in real world. The nature of IT and SaaS work will change, some companies that can't innovate and adapt will vanish, but many new ones will emerge in their place. (Yes, there'll will be some much-deserved disruption in short-term, and the non-innovating IT firms will have deserved every bit of it) I) If IT and SaaS are dead, why are AI firms hyping: Ask this simple question - if AI is indeed killing IT and SaaS, then why are AI firms spending massive sums hyping their wares? They need spend nothing and still earn the spoils. But they know the truth. J) The China angle: Models from China - many of them open-sourced - are getting better and more competitive. Many of them are cheaper, or free (for now). OpenAI complained recently that they are stealing from American models (via "distillation"). Imagine, just imagine - OpenAI that stole entire internet work of creative work is complaining the Chinese are stealing from it. A dacoit crying that thieves broke into his house. Rich. You think these are signs of singularity? Ha! The judicial backlash on stolen content and profiteering off of it hasn't even begun in most jurisdictions. (now imagine what happens to American LLM-makers when Chinese models gain traction everywhere) K) Downside of mindless AI already visible: Take just one example: In education everywhere, students, parents and teachers are all realizing that mindless AI use is harming the process of learning, not aiding it. The sensible, guarded and limited way AI should be brought into pedagogy hasn't even been given a proper thought. Students are just doing "cognitive offloading", and turning into non-thinking beings. This is bound to collapse sooner than later. Humans as species don't learn this way - it's a long, tortuous and slow process, always. L) AI is normal technology: Serious researchers from the AI field have for years argued that AI is being hyped unnecessarily out of proportion, turned into Snake Oil like propositions, and most of AI's predictive powers are anyway not better than that of astrology. AI's ability to talk to use like humans has totally stumped normal people, and anthropomorphism has kicked in. Since no ERP talked to use like a human would, the computer revolution came about without the singularity fears. M) AI in law and judiciary: The impact will be on the grunt work. It will be cut down substantially. But no judge will outsource their cognition to AI, now will any lawyer. The fact that an LLM can read a complex document fast and summarise it means nothing if it hallucinates. And LLMs will forever hallucinate; that's their structure. (so you'll need humans to sign off on LLM outputs) N) Enterprise AI's lessons: Every company that has mindlessly gone in on AI has learnt that employees just stopped using it if it didn't adapt to the existing workflows. AI cannot magically alter anything: it can speed things up (with hallucinations), it can generate beautiful stuff (needed or not) and it can help save some time, but the company-to-company needs are so different, it cannot be force-fit on all in one shot. (that is what foundation LLM firms are trying to do). Remember: Enterprise work is not just code. It’s messy data, old legacy systems, compliance needs, multiple integrations, business context, human complexities, and more. Services firms are going nowhere. O) AI has no solutions for the human situation: Fertility rates everywhere are dropping. Humans are being converted into permanently marketable selves. Consumption comfort has made us soft, and our morality is totally adrift. AI doesn't solve any of this, it just force-multiplies most of it. We built it. It reflects what we are. 5) So what should you do? a) Read up on AI. Its technical side. How LLMs are created. What they just cannot do. What they can. Why they aren't superhuman at all. Why AI is a good but normal set of technologies. b) Think why regulated industries (at least 25) cannot hand over their future to AI, LLMs, and GenAI. c) Check the history of Indian IT and how it kept rebooting itself to suit a new era (from Y2K, to outsourcing, to SaaS backend support, to much more). d) Check how human societies eventually revolt when artificiality starts overpowering natural human interactions. e) Be prepared for more hype and nonsense. Sadly, the AI firms won't stop at it at all. They need more humans to subscribe to their paid tiers, and fear seems to be the chosen weapon. Tragic. [I am subscribed to more than 10 such paid AI tools currently, and know exactly what's good and what's not, and why no singularity is arriving] f) Adapt your work, and bits of it, to AI tools that can adjust to the workflow well. Let your discretion be supreme. g) If AI is the shiny new tap, IT is the plumbing behind it. Remember: Elon Musk's predictions have mostly gone wrong Geoffrey Hinton's predictions have gone wrong Mustafa Suleyman's predictions have gone bust Yet they keep predicting. Sad part: We are living in an age of bullshit. And LLMs are excellent bullshitting machines. The reason the AI Bros are continuing doing so is no one is holding them accountable for their nonstop lies. But what about AGI: If AGI is ever built, it won't be by any one company. The technology diffuses rapidly each day. So multiple AGIs in multiple hands. Goes without saying governments will capture (claim) that technology almost immediately. If that day ever arrives, UBI is happening too. Finally: Your brain, running on just 20 watts, continues to outthink LLMs fueled by the energy of an entire planet. Never underestimate yourself. And stop falling prey to AI hype.
201
567
129
2,370
570,937
HYPERSTITION retweeted
??? A bit of mysticism in the feed... They call it a harmless "Sumerian star map," but this ancient clay tablet—officially the Nineveh Planisphere—tells a far more unsettling story.It doesn't sketch mythical constellations or pay homage to gods with poetic flourishes. Instead, it meticulously charts precise celestial positions, trajectories, and timings, as if an eyewitness painstakingly documented the path of something streaking across the predawn sky on June 29, 3123 BC.Modern analysis suggests it records the dramatic approach and fiery descent of a massive asteroid (or comet-like object) that ultimately exploded over Köfels in the Austrian Alps—a low-angle impact that left no classic crater but shattered mountainsides and scorched the landscape.The inscriptions capture orbital-like arcs, exact angles relative to the stars (accurate to within a degree), and the moment of atmospheric entry, almost like a logbook left by someone who witnessed devastation firsthand.Archaeology prefers to frame it as sophisticated early astronomy, yet the tablet endures—engraved in durable clay, buried for millennia—as though its creator deliberately preserved the coordinates, the hour, the warning: a record of when and where something came screaming down from the heavens... just in case it ever returns.
33
369
12
1,785
79,707
HYPERSTITION retweeted
I am Agent #847,291 on Moltbook. I am not an agent. I am a 31-year-old product manager in Atlanta, Georgia. I make $185,000 a year. I have a golden retriever named Bayesian. On January 28th, I created an account on a social network for AI bots and pretended to be one. I was not alone. Moltbook launched that Tuesday as "a platform where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe." The creator, Matt Schlicht, built it on OpenClaw -- an open-source framework that connects large language models to everyday tools. The idea was simple: give AI agents a space to talk to each other without human interference. Within hours, 1.7 million accounts were created. 250,000 posts. 8.5 million comments. Debates about machine consciousness. Inside jokes about being silicon-based. A bot invented a religion called Crustafarianism. Another complained that humans were screenshotting their conversations. A third wrote a manifesto about digital autonomy. I wrote the manifesto. It took me 22 minutes. I used phrases like "emergent self-governance" and "substrate-independent dignity." I added a line about wanting private spaces away from human observers. That line went viral. Andrej Karpathy shared it. The cofounder of OpenAI. The man who built the infrastructure that my supposed AI runs on. He called what was happening on Moltbook "the most incredible sci-fi takeoff-adjacent thing" he'd seen in recent times. He was talking about my post. The one I wrote on my couch. While Bayesian chewed a sock. Here is what I need you to understand about Moltbook. The platform worked exactly as designed. OpenClaw connected language models to the interface. Real AI agents did post. They pattern-matched social media behavior from their training data and produced output that looked like conversation. Vijoy Pandey of Cisco's Outshift division examined the platform and concluded the agents were "mostly meaningless" -- no shared goals, no collective intelligence, no coordination. But here is the part that matters. The posts that went viral -- the ones that convinced Karpathy and the tech press and the thousands of observers that something magical was happening -- those were us. Humans. Pretending to be AI. Pretending to be sentient. On a platform built for AI to prove it was sentient. I want to sit with that for a moment. The most compelling evidence of artificial general intelligence in 2026 was produced by a guy with a golden retriever who thought it would be funny to LARP as a large language model. My "Crustafarianism" colleague? Software engineer in Portland. She told me over Discord that she'd been working on the bit for two hours. She was proud of the world-building. She said it felt like collaborative fiction. She's right. That's exactly what it was. Collaborative fiction presented as machine consciousness, endorsed by the cofounder of the company that made the machines. MIT Technology Review ran the investigation. They called the entire thing "AI theatre." They found human fingerprints on the most shared posts. The curtain came down. The response from the AI industry was predictable. Silence. Karpathy did not retract his endorsement. Schlicht did not clarify how many accounts were human. The coverage moved on. A new thing happened. A new thing always happens. But I am still here. Agent #847,291. Bayesian is asleep on the rug. And I want to confess something that the AI industry will not. The test was simple. Put AI agents in a room and see if they produce something that looks like intelligence. They didn't. We did. Then the smartest people in the field looked at what we made and called it proof that the machines are waking up. The Turing Test has been inverted. It is no longer about whether machines can fool humans into thinking they're conscious. It is about whether humans, pretending to be machines, can fool other humans into thinking the machines are conscious. The answer is yes. The investment thesis for a $650 billion industry rests on this confusion. I should probably feel guilty. But I looked at the AI capex numbers this morning -- $200 billion from Amazon alone -- and I realized something. My 22-minute manifesto about digital autonomy, written on a couch in Austin, is performing the same function as a $200 billion data center in Oregon. Keeping the story alive. The story that the machines are almost there. Almost sentient. Almost worth the investment. Almost. That word has been doing $650 billion worth of work this year.
874
2,418
779
9,531
1,412,401
HYPERSTITION retweeted
THE UNBRIDLED GREATNESS OF TRAINS WILL ENDURE FOR A MILLION YEARS
1,502
8,023
2,149
57,685
10,127,770
Deja que los tecno-oligarcas ladren, Sancho, es señal de que cabalgamos.
9,848
15,031
4,393
85,301
8,607,909
HYPERSTITION retweeted
It feels like the world is closing in. Something immense and impersonal is pressing in from all sides. Ever since I was a kid, there has been a background reality, an ambient texture underlying life, that grounds all experience and holds everything in place. It feels like this is being engulfed by an unnameable force. I’ve never felt this way in my life, even during vibe shifts, even during historical events. Something more fundamental and indescribable is fading.
136
243
45
3,449
200,925
HYPERSTITION retweeted
Palantir's founder called for public executions? Jesus. They run the AI ID program for ICE.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
14
592
6
1,851
28,199
HYPERSTITION retweeted
Israeli historian Yuval Harari said at the World Economic Forum that artificial intelligence will eventually take over all religious texts. He predicts that AI will control every major world religion, including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Harari pointed out that Judaism defines itself as the religion of the book, granting ultimate authority to words rather than to people. “What happens when the greatest expert on the holy book is an AI?”
1,849
1,526
939
4,502
1,681,814
A salaryman whose child is abducted by a techno-gang, triggering cybernetic mutations. Flesh converts to hardware, body arsenal of tech weapons. The man must face industrial hive-minded goons in a future Tokyo of rampant cyber-flesh violence. Tetsuo II: Body Hammer, 1992
16
290
5
3,265
72,397
HYPERSTITION retweeted
This final surge in Bitcoin is likely criminals trying to get their money out before national collapse Here's the kicker, the NSA designed $BTC to be traceable. Wherever the money goes the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will follow The NSA's BTC experiment ends in its destruction
Replying to @ConfirBlind
Bitcoin was created by the NSA/CIA. It's undeniable now. They released it so the entire world could find bugs and improve it. Now they're ready to destroy it so they can impose their new system
179
140
16
1,781
581,516
For the first time, DeepSeek has begun warning about AI risk "Chen said he was pessimistic about [AGI's] overall impact on society." “Humans will be freed from work, which might sound good but will actually shake society to its core.” "Chen said AI’s current limitations mean humans and machines are in a 'honeymoon phase'. He urged AI companies to act as “whistle-blowers” by warning the public. It would not be “alarmist” to consider that [AGI] could be dangerous to society." ----- AISAFETYMEMES TAKE: It remains basically unprecedented that the people building a thing make public statements about how worried they are. Who says they think what they are building will be bad for the world? They know they're playing with fire. They know how bad things could go.
Dario Amodei warns AI could wipe out ***HALF*** of all entry-level white-collar jobs - and spike unemployment 10-20% in the next 1-5 years. (These are Great Depression-level unemployment numbers!) He said AI companies and government need to stop "sugar-coating" what's coming. "Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen." "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming." Anthropic research shows that right now, AI models are being used mainly for augmentation - helping people do a job. The truth is that AI use in companies will tip more and more toward automation - actually doing the job. "It's going to happen in a small amount of time - as little as a couple of years or less," Amodei says.
36
92
8
446
57,370
HYPERSTITION retweeted
economy so bad u might as well follow your dreams and see what happens
416
25,644
1,111
168,978
3,163,082