Primary takes detailed in this pod about You Can See Everything : 1. It is the ideal film for a conspiratorial public that now wishes to insert themselves into the room of every story as a remote investigator, regardless of their involvement or expertise. No one wants to passively watch. Attention can only be held if the viewer feels invited to “investigate” and “take notes” so they can participate online later. This is downstream of Qanon type sentiments, or what we saw occur after the Epstein files were released. A ton of scraps and micro impressions thrown into the wind and letting everyone have at it. 2. “Is she lying?” is a faulty and impossible core question. Holmes essentially just repeats her demeanor and story from her legal questioning. What else would she possibly do. Public approval or Fielder’s affection is not worth more legal drama or less time with her children. Clear as day 3. Conflict is innately intimate and conflict is felt amongst the characters but also the viewers imposing themselves on the characters 4. The film accesses something we all know well - the rehashing of human dramas within our circles, akin to having a weird roommate or coworker and talking about it every day. We all know this feeling, so we can be within it. Holmes & co all being weirdos part of an elite scam and Fielder’s camp brings artist weirdness just makes it all the more compelling. It is both familiar and titillating. Your weirdest friends have drama and you get to be on the couch 5. Billy clearly just has post-cancel ptsd and needs to get that sorted , maybe with that one Ru Paul tweet about overcoming your own crucifixion 6. Discourse is integral advertising 7. Their love is real not because they are real , but because love is real, and we all recognize it . Love is an entity that possesses and consumes, regardless of who and where 8. The Joy of psychoanalysis 9. Much more ….