I'm a paleoanthropologist. I explore human fossils and genomes to understand where we came from and what we share with our ancestors.

Wisconsin
Joined July 2009
John Hawks retweeted
Replying to @giannis_daras
Everything at the end will look like a Nature/PNAS paper: a quick 6-pager for humans, and a humongous 150-page supplement with all possible experiments and analyses (mainly for the machines to read and review). Together with an automatic verification/reproducibility package that ensures that whatever the paper says is verifiable. And at the end everything will seem like before, but underneath everything will have changed.
3
6
2
43
3,531
John Hawks retweeted
The use of AI in research is producing three tribes. The gatekeepers — the Pangramiani — care about provenance: research is a profession, authorship matters, and AI should be banned, discouraged, or marked through disclosure. The AI cultists care about results: if knowledge advances, who cares whether it came from a human, a machine, or both? Pangram delenda est. And now a third tribe is emerging: the curators/storytellers. As AI starts cracking increasingly hard mathematical proofs, discovery itself becomes less scarce. The human role shifts to understanding the result, judging its importance, connecting it to what we know, and explaining it to everyone else.
18
17
7
107
14,429
John Hawks retweeted
Replying to @johnhawks
Paleoanthropology needs to abandon the notion of a geographical "origin" - a very simplistic monolineage concept invalidated by overwhelming fossil and molecular evidence of a complex reticulate network for the entire recognized Homo existence period. Even at (much) deeper time depths, and given a biased and fragmented fossil record, disputed lithic evidence plus historical biases, the presumption of a single "origin" biogeography is also problematic in light of hominid and hominin hybridization - often the result of contact between previously separated biogeographies. This was clearly a multi-regional evolutionary process dominated by punctuated phases of gene flow between highly mobile, adaptive and intelligent species, and probably reaching back into the Miocene as Eurasian hominine-like fossil discoveries would suggest.
4
1
17
1,278
John Hawks retweeted
Meet the most glamourous Neanderthal knife ever. See the shiny spot, left by the knapper exactly in the middle? Tell me, they were not aestetically sensitive. #RajCave what a cave
2
14
118
5,914
I know people think the Monty Hall problem is a game show trick or a silly math puzzle, but the fact that most people get the logic wrong can have real world consequences. I'll walk you through an example I teach in my undergraduate Human Genetics class.
16
108
12
1,305
158,122
The 2026 Buck Moon as it appeared over Southern Arizona last night. Think clouds acted as a prism, splitting the broadband light from the moon into a stunning array of colors. This is an HDR composite captured from two photos, one exposed for the moon, one exposed for the halo.
81
282
22
2,695
38,184
Long before Florence Nightingale or modern data science, women were likely the first to track cycles, patterns, and records. Alexey Pomigalov digs into that lineage in Nightingale, connecting Stone Age bones to the software cracking cave art today! buff.ly/aRALcHX
1
3
10
2,047
That was demoralizing for reviewers - and bleak for the science landscape. An enormous amount of time and effort is devoted to unproductive grant-writing. (11/10)
1
2
1
26
6,368
This photo has a very personal meaning for me if you care to read it. I saw a photo from @johnkrausphotos on reddit nearly a decade ago of the engines on a Falcon Heavy launch. I was working at a tough sales job at the time. The shot inspired me to learn more about space and spaceflight. Shortly after, I bought my first telescope. I saw Jupiter, Saturn, and Nebulae, and started social media accounts where I shared my amateur photos. Then I was laid off, and Covid happened. Moved from Sacramento to Arizona for clearer skies, cheaper cost of living, and a chance to go all-in on space photography. My audience started to grow. Then, NASA contacted me, asking me if they could use some of my moon photos for something called Artemis. I said yes. During the Artemis I rollout my DMs blew up “Andrew- your photo is on the Mobile Launch Platform!”. Now I knew that astrophotography wasn’t enough… I should probably pay attention to spaceflight. I spent a lot coming out to the first launch attempt, which would be my first rocket launch if it flew. Sadly, it was a scrub. I came home from Florida, sharing my stories of touring the VAB and facilities with my grandfather, who worked on Apollo. He passed shortly after, which affected my ability to return to watch the SLS flew. Feeling bummed out, I focused back on my deep sky work, but then I started hearing about something called “Starship”. I caught a video from @Erdayastronaut where a rocket ship fell through the air belly-first and flipped upright and landed. Inspired, I knew I had to witness one of these machines fly, so I flew to Starbase the moment I could afford it, which was for the second fully integrated flight test. The moment Starship lifted off the pad, I was hooked. There was nothing quite like the experience. I did everything I could to catch every launch I could, and worked to become credentialed media to get better access. Last year I flew from Arizona to Florida & Texas over a dozen times specifically to sharpen my launch photography skills with our first human spaceflight to the moon in over 50 years looming. A decade of preparation for a split second moment. When I picked up my camera from the launch pad yesterday morning and peeked at what was captured, I knew it was all worth it. Thank you, NASA, Artemis, and the all people who inspired me along the way. This is still only the beginning.
Pleased to share my favorite high-resolution capture of the Artemis II launch- the moment the SLS is clearing the tower, captured by a sound-triggered camera placed near the pad. I'll have prints linked in my bio for this one, and here's a short thread about how it was captured
398
1,032
56
10,516
287,373
Monthly median Received to Accepted time (days) at Nature Genetics
19
46
23
229
151,138
John Hawks retweeted
That is not to say that narratives suitable for humans are not important and should be abolished. But the current publishing system is flawed not only for its misaligned incentives, but also for the way it buries information in ways that are difficult to extract. 6/
3
5
35
6,169
Fragment de maxil·lar d'hipopòtam europeu (Hippopotamus antiquus), descobert al Barranc de la Boella (Plistocè Inferior final, 1 Ma-780 Ka BP; La Canonja, Tarragonès) i exposat a @espaimammuthus. #FossilFriday #Pleistocene #Artiodactyla
10
22
1,866
Just out "Social and emotional cognition in Pleistocene hominin evolution: The role of biocultural processes" with @johnhawks @MarcKissel Penny Spikins, Jennifer French and me. Open access in Journal of Archaeological Science... sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
1
2
1
7
1,561
Academic Geography narrowcasting for a moment here: Geography, almost always a trend laggard in academia, didn't really adopt modern peer review norms until the 1970s-80s. These norms were introduced via the discipline's so-called "Quantitative Revolution" and then adopted in more deeply institutionalized form by left-wing quant/qual geographers via the Critical Turn (1980s-onward, still the reigning paradigm). Prior to modern peer review norms, review happened through internal editorial discussion and reputation, sometimes negatively remembered as "the old boys club." It is worth noting a few things here: peer review did *not* predominate during Geography's "humanist" period of the 60s-70s, and the humanist geography classics by Yi-Fu Tuan, Carl Saur, Ted Relph, etc. were not peer reviewed. It is also worth noting that most of the classics of Marxist geography in the early 80s were not peer reviewed. Harvey's "Limits to Capital" was not peer-reviewed. Peer review in academic Geography (as in most if not all other disciplines) has no track record whatsoever shepherding paradigm shift and intellectual transition. Peer review is about rewarding intellectual conformism and stasis, and transmutating unimaginative "output" into CV items. I'll write a more in-depth Subst about this soon. @stephwakefield_ @AttohKafui @Bob_WilsonGEO
Peer review as we think of it today only really dates back to the 1960s and has no track record whatsoever of facilitating any Kuhnian paradigm shifts. I suspect it can't actually facilitate this, and can only enforce norms protecting the old paradigm.
4
9
3
80
32,248
Peer review as we think of it today only really dates back to the 1960s and has no track record whatsoever of facilitating any Kuhnian paradigm shifts. I suspect it can't actually facilitate this, and can only enforce norms protecting the old paradigm.
Everyone is focusing on the "fascism" angle but on more thought i think it's actually "under peer review" that is more telling. It's meant to convey "the acid test of Truth" but it's ultimately a social process that can enforce consensus, even if that consensus is mistaken.
6
48
4
329
46,078
And the scan itself! It's huge. This male aurochs had over 80cm horn span!
Today I 3d scanned a 3000 years old Aurochs skull! Hopefully I will be able to restore it to life!
8
64
2
800
21,985
HHMI should emphasize to its scientists that the costs of journal publishing go far beyond dollars, and that HHMI scientists would be better served spending their time and money on new research rather than cleaving to the demands of editors and reviewers, and on participating in nascent systems of transparent preprint review rather than supporting journal gatekeeping with their time and intellectual labor. In addition to time spent directly on journal activities, the greatest loss comes in optimizing science for editorial outcomes rather than scientific innovation.
2
2
6
2,616
I’m a former creationist. Here’s why telling people to ‘follow the science’ won’t work. This is my first American opinion piece - I can’t tell you how it feels to say my piece on this in my own words. Here’s a free link (also watch HUMAN on PBS): l.instagram.com/?u=https%3A%…
This is my 1st American op-ed; my backstory and evolutionary biology’s understanding of tribalism can help explain why simply telling people to ‘believe the science’ won’t work. I’m an evolutionary biologist. I’m also a former creationist. wapo.st/4nqIhQE
3
4
1
23
7,618
John Hawks retweeted
let’s spotlight the new kid on the block…UW105. The “newest” hominin fossil bearing site, is one to keep an eye on, not just for its abundance of fossils,but the research and technical team on the ground making discoveries everyday. #HeritageDay #SouthAfrica
4
13
1,120
John Hawks retweeted
September 24th marks South Africa’s national Heritage Day. We celebrate the country’s diversity of cultures and traditions. A part of that heritage is the recognition of our ancient past through the lens of a very unique part of the world,the Cradle of Humankind. #HeritageDay
1
3
4
1,023