James Murphy retweeted
Star Trek presents a fascinating contradiction, although perhaps not the one Gene Roddenberry intended.
It imagines humanity progressing beyond money, poverty, and material scarcity, while celebrating individual achievement, innovation, scientific discovery, personal ambition, and freedom.
Yet the technological abundance making this possible would require precisely the productive achievements that capitalism rewards.
Replicators still require resources, energy, infrastructure, maintenance, and innovation. Scarcity doesn't simply disappear because money does.
And perhaps most revealingly, Star Trek's most terrifying villains, the Borg, embody collectivism taken to its logical extreme.
Individual identity is abolished. Personal ambition is irrelevant. Everyone exists to serve the collective. Resistance is futile.
Meanwhile, the Federation's heroes defend individual liberty, voluntary cooperation, independent thought, and personal achievement.
Perhaps Roddenberry wasn't so much rejecting capitalism as imagining a future in which its greatest achievements had made the struggle for material survival largely obsolete.
There's nothing inherently socialist about prosperity so extraordinary that people can pursue their passions without worrying about survival.
And there's certainly nothing anti-capitalist about a civilization built on individual excellence, innovation, and voluntary cooperation.
Star Trek may romanticize socialist economic aspirations, but its heroes consistently defend the individual against the collective.
That's a far more compelling defense of capitalism than its creators may have realized.
James Murphy retweeted
“But what about the deaths caused by capitalism?”
When discussing economic systems, I often highlight how Marxist socialism devastated Africa and other regions of the world, leading to the deaths of millions of people. Inevitably, someone responds: “But what about the deaths caused by capitalism?”
This response reveals a fundamental misunderstanding that needs addressing. It blames capitalism not just for greed, but for all of humanity’s darker instincts, as if free markets somehow invented human flaws.
Let’s get something straight: greed, exploitation, and cruelty have existed throughout human history, long before anyone conceived of property rights or free enterprise.
1/ Greed Predates Capitalism
Long before Adam Smith put pen to paper, humans had already committed unspeakable acts of greed, conquest, and exploitation:
- Genghis Khan ran a brutal empire that expanded through violence and rape. According to genetic studies, around 8% of men in a large region of Asia carry DNA linked to him.
- The Atlantic Slave Trade was powered by kings, empires, tribal chiefs, and European monarchies, most of whom operated under imperial and monarchical structures.
- In pre-revolutionary France, the monarchy, nobility, and upper clergy lived in great privilege and luxury, while the vast majority of peasants (about 80% of the population) endured poverty, heavy taxation, and frequent hunger.
There have always been selfish, greedy, and rapacious people, and there always will be, as long as humans exist. Every economic and political system has had greedy people in it. The difference is whether that system limits their power or lets it run wild.
2/ The Enemies Invented “Capitalism”
The word “capitalism” was coined by socialist critics in the 19th century, including Louis Blanc, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Karl Marx.
They used it to criticize the system they believed would inevitably collapse. Since they coined the term, it means whatever socialists want it to mean. That’s why the socialism vs. capitalism debate is often a Trojan horse to avoid admitting that free markets actually work.
Adam Smith (who is often called the “father of capitalism”) never actually used the word. Instead, he described natural liberty, where:
“Every man, as long as he does not violate the laws of justice, is left perfectly free to pursue his own interest his own way.”
(The Wealth of Nations)
John Locke, whose ideas heavily influenced America’s founding documents, focused on natural rights to “life, liberty, and property” in his Second Treatise of Government (1689). He argued these rights existed prior to government, which was instituted specifically to protect them.
When the American Founders created the US Constitution, they didn’t use the word capitalism either. The Bill of Rights protects individual freedoms like freedom of speech, religion, assembly, property, and due process, all of which protect individuals from both tyrants and mobs.
In other words, the core principles we now associate with “capitalism” were never about enriching the few. They were about protecting the many from power, whether it came from kings, mobs, or bureaucrats.
3/ Voluntary Socialism
Here’s the thing: if a group of people want to live communally, they should absolutely have that freedom. Such voluntary arrangements don’t require state coercion or enforcement.
For instance:
- The Amish live simply and share resources, but joining is voluntary, and people are free to leave if they choose.
- Kibbutzim are intentional communities in Israel, traditionally based on agriculture and collective ownership. Membership is voluntary, and individuals are free to leave at any time.
- Monasteries and religious orders have lived communally for centuries and continue to operate around the world, with monks and nuns sharing resources, labor, and prayer.
This is voluntary socialism, and no free-market advocate has a problem with it.
Marxist socialism is something else entirely. It calls for revolution, the abolition of private property, and stateless dictatorships with no respect for individual rights. It caused 65–94 million deaths, with some estimates exceeding 100 million.
It’s worth noting that capitalism even gives people the freedom to experiment with Marxist ideals.
In a free market, you’re allowed to create worker-owned businesses based on Marx’s labor theory of value if you want to. Cooperatives, mutual aid societies, and communal living models can and do exist under capitalism.
Every system has greedy people, but only free market capitalism, rooted in individual rights and the rule of law, limits their power through competition, transparency, and choice.
James Murphy retweeted
Replying to @PaulTynan10 @Munsterrugby
The opposite in fact. Excellent statement. – at Limerick, Ireland
Replying to @Munsterrugby
Gavin Coombes is a Munster legend and his honest account confirmed by the committee, should also have been publicly supported by Andy Farrell and @IrishRugby
James Murphy retweeted
Statement | Independent Disciplinary Committee Decision
👉 munsterrugby.ie/news/stateme…
#SUAF 🔴
James Murphy retweeted
Replying to @CianTracey1
Replying to @CianTracey1
The committee had noted that Gavin Coombes gave an honest account of what happened but that no law was broken. Confusing decision.
James Murphy retweeted
Spelling bee contestant is give the word "woman".
He then asks them to define "woman".
The rest is comedy gold 🤣
James Murphy retweeted
Everyone at Irish Rugby is saddened to learn of the passing of Phil O'Callaghan.
We extend our sympathies to Phil's family, friends and former team-mates at this sad time.
It is with great sadness that Munster Rugby have learned of the passing of Phil O'Callaghan.
A Dolphin RFC clubman, he made his Munster Senior Cup debut in 1961 having only taken up rugby the previous season and continued to play in the competition every year up until 1980.
He won 21 caps for his country between 1967 and 1976 and he was inducted into our Hall of Fame in 2016.
Ar dheis de go raibh a anam 🌹
#SUAF 🔴
James Murphy retweeted
It is with great sadness that Munster Rugby have learned of the passing of Phil O'Callaghan.
A Dolphin RFC clubman, he made his Munster Senior Cup debut in 1961 having only taken up rugby the previous season and continued to play in the competition every year up until 1980.
He won 21 caps for his country between 1967 and 1976 and he was inducted into our Hall of Fame in 2016.
Ar dheis de go raibh a anam 🌹
#SUAF 🔴
James Murphy retweeted
This is the intellectual level of the average Paddystinian - thinking that a country where gay marriage is legal is more homophobic than a society which kills gay people.
These people would be evil if they weren't so pathetic.
Morally bankrupt cowards.
Replying to @Gtmag11 @OdohertyI64991
Leviticus 20:13 explicitly prescribes death for sexual relations between men. The Torah...
You ignorant, bigoted cunt...
James Murphy retweeted
The Nazi's can enact every single Socialist policy and program we have always known to be Socialist, with all of their leaders telling us they were Socialists, and modern day Socialists will say ''lol you think they were Socialists because they named their party that?!''
No, you fucking retards, it was all the Socialism that makes me believe they were Socialists.
Noam Chomsky, the "Father of modern linguistics," looked at evidence of industrial-scale murder and decided the real problem was Western media bias.
By 1977, Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge had already killed roughly 1.7 million Cambodians through execution, forced starvation, and slave labor. Chomsky, writing with Edward Herman in "Distortions at Fourth Hand," treated survivor testimony and refugee accounts as State Department fabrications, preferring the far lower body counts published in sympathetic leftist sources.
The intellectual gymnastics required to reach that conclusion were extraordinary. Chomsky dismissed Father Ponchaud's firsthand reporting, questioned Francois Ponchaud's credibility directly, and leaned on a 1977 State Department document to suggest deaths numbered in the thousands, not hundreds of thousands. He applied maximum skepticism to anti-communist sources and near-zero skepticism to anything that cut against American foreign policy narratives. The methodology was selective to the point of being fraudulent.
Chomsky was not a fringe figure typing in a basement. He held an MIT professorship and commanded enormous intellectual authority among Western leftists. When he cast doubt on Cambodian atrocity reports, journalists and academics listened. Real people died while influential intellectuals debated whether their deaths were sufficiently well-sourced.
Collectivist ideology requires enemies to function. When the Khmer Rouge built their agrarian utopia by emptying Phnom Penh at gunpoint and executing anyone wearing glasses, Chomsky's instinct was to protect the ideological project by attacking the messengers. Ideology over corpses.
James Murphy retweeted
Replying to @The42_ie
I know Wessels, he wpuld never ever.
Same = Same
Let's see if the outcome = same!


































