juan v. retweeted
🚨 Le gouvernement de @SebLecornu introduit un amendement scélérat à la loi « casseurs-payeurs » pour bloquer tout réseau social qui ne supprimerait pas sous une heure tout contenu qui ne plairait pas à Matignon.
Sur injonction administrative. Sans juge. Sans mécanisme d’appel. Sans contrôle. Des fonctionnaires décideraient de ce qui relève d'une opinion autorisée de celle qui doit être censurée. Cette dérive autoritaire est une grave menace pour la démocratie. Aujourd'hui on veut censurer les « appels à l'armement », demain cela sera les articles critiques contre l'extrême centre, ou ceux qui se plaignent du cout de la vie. L'exception devient toujours la règle dans le domaine sécuritaire.
juan v. retweeted
What stage of democracy is this?
"The majority of Italian society is against military aid to Ukraine. But we must not listen to society if it is wrong."
-- Italian Minister of Defense.
juan v. retweeted
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union.
First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see.
Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself.
The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too.
The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for.
Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway.
And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums.
But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly.
And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros.
Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute.
Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties.
The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want.
And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do.
All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore.
The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
🤖 Made with AI
juan v. retweeted
La violencia en las manifestaciones puede servir para justificar más control. El relato acusa a infiltrados de provocar disturbios y señala una estrategia para atribuirlos a Francia Insumisa. #Francia #PolĂtica
juan v. retweeted
We made 3000 over twenty years. Expended 2000 with nothing to show for it. Why don’t just fire off the 1000 that are left and go home? Are these 1000 supposed to impress the Chinese?
juan v. retweeted
This is where I am politically right now. Despite Melenchon's rousing speeches and appeals to appropriate post-Keynesian economic policies, the current European riots have sunk into their usual headless, directionless shape. The polls have hardly shifted - le Pen was already well ahead. Any 'revolutionary' situation will be captured by the far right. The awkward corollary of what I've written below is that if we seek to construct a serious, committed opposition, first we must elicit an equal and opposite fear grounded in reality. We must replace the manufactured fears of immigrants, public 'debt', bond markets and so on with an overriding objective fear. What will really happen to the West if we carry on like this? It's an unfortunate fact that fear is the primary fuel for the hope, rational discussions of political economy and positive protest and action - aimed at what we're FOR rather than against - that come later. Dupuy's 'enlightened catastrophism' - @winlow_s has written about this cambridge.org/core/books/abs… and there's a useful summary here. cyrilhedoin.substack.com/p/e…
Replying to @geeceevee
The constant flow of 'assured nonsense' you hear from the likes of Friedman - temporary winners, aspirers and their mouthpieces - is what aroused my interest in neuropsychology years ago. Ideological positions driven at root by primary affective demands - fear of loss and sacrifice being the strongest - create what Adrian Johnston calls 'deaptation'. The very thought of true democracy and the prioritisation of collective needs - the 'public interest' - triggers that fear. The more serial market failures and their negative real effects refute their position, the more fearful they become, which strengthens their beliefs, even though, cognitively, the relatively brighter ones might understand their absurdity. The evasive ethical/cognitive justification invoked is the sort of Churchillian 'least-worst' thinking you hear all the time - "ok, this is absurd and quite awful but it's better than socialism and we'll get through this rocky patch". The worse things get - and they will - the more they will double down on their beliefs. There will be no limits to their corruption and violence. No point in reasoning with them - we must construct a serious opposition amongst the unaffected and unconvinced.
juan v. retweeted
Parece que no Ăbamos desencaminados cuando señalábamos que esta "crisis" se pretende aprovechar para controlar las comunicaciones.
Según publica @blast, el 22 de octubre de 2026, el primer ministro Sébastien Lecornu escribió a los directores de Orange, SFR, Free y Bouygues Telecom pidiéndoles que se prepararan para cortar temporalmente el acceso a TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat y, posteriormente, X. La medida estaba prevista para el fin de semana del 24 y 25 de octubre, en caso de reincidencia de violencias urbanas durante las manifestaciones.
SegĂşn la carta y el acta de la reuniĂłn del 23 de octubre, el Gobierno justificaba la peticiĂłn por el papel de esas plataformas en la coordinaciĂłn de actos violentos el 17 y 18 de octubre
Los operadores expresaron dudas sobre la viabilidad tĂ©cnica y jurĂdica: no podĂan limitar el bloqueo solo a mĂłviles o a zonas concretas a corto plazo, un VPN bastarĂa para eludirlo, y consideraban que la medida planteaba problemas de necesidad, proporcionalidad y forma legal. El Gobierno se apoyaba en la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado sobre Nueva Caledonia de 2025, que admitiĂł el principio bajo condiciones estrictas, aunque habĂa anulado el bloqueo concreto. La medida finalmente no se aplicĂł.
blast-info.fr/articles/2026/…
juan v. retweeted
la mitad de los españoles deberĂa probar a quedarse con los bolsillos vacĂos y sin trabajo y comprobar lo “fácil” que es acceder a esas ayudas, cuántas existen realmente y cĂłmo se malvive con 400-600 € al mes. el neoliberalismo os tiene podridos el cerebro y el corazĂłn
La mitad de los españoles cree que las personas pobres tienden a acomodarse y depender de ayudas en vez de buscar soluciones. Uno de cada 10 asocia la pobreza a la pereza o falta de principios morales elpais.com/sociedad/2026-10-…
juan v. retweeted
L'enquête de Mediapart sur le 17 octobre, place de la République à Paris, contredit les affirmations du ministre de l'intérieur : ce sont bien des policiers (de la Brav-M) qui ont provoqué le chaos en lançant des grenades sur une foule pacifique.
mediapart.fr/journal/france/…
juan v. retweeted
Ces images sont insupportables.
Il faut qu'elles fassent le tour du monde.
Que le monde entier sache que Macron et sa milice sont des fascistes.
#24octobre
#24octobre2026
#LaRepubliqueEstANous
juan v. retweeted
🔴 URGENT : La police matraque sévèrement toutes les personnes qui attendent les bus ou les trams pour quitter la Porte de Vincennes ce soir à Paris
đź“· @AdrienAdcaZz pour @LibreQg
#24oct #24octobre #Manifestationsdu24
juan v. retweeted
đź”´ #AHORA | La violencia se extiende a ParĂs y Marsella, mientras la policĂa francesa intensifica la represiĂłn de las protestas contra las polĂticas de austeridad con gases lacrimĂłgenos y cañones de agua en varias de las principales ciudades del paĂs.
juan v. retweeted
🔴🇫🇷‼️ALERTE INFO - Des policiers chargent à Paris et frappent violemment des manifestants à coups de matraque.
#24octobre
juan v. retweeted
Macron : "la recommandation générale c'est qu'il n'y ait pas de manifestation dans les prochains jours".
Le peuple français 👇
juan v. retweeted
#Estrategias
Desestabilizar las manifestaciones legĂtimas para estabilizar el orden con la inestimable ayuda del vandalismo y su inducciĂłn parapolicial
Orwell Lives
#ĂšLTIMAHORA | Macron anuncia restricciones a las manifestaciones en Francia y convoca un Consejo de Defensa.
The Economist lecturing as if it had nothing to do with them.
Europe’s centrist rulers have fallen dangerously short—and are now paying the price bit.ly/4k45hWY
































